ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07176962Updated Sep 16, 2025

A Cell-free DNA Methylation Blood-Based Test for Biliary Tract Cancers Screening

An observational study in Gall Bladder Cancer, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (Icc) and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, sponsored by Yingbin Liu, MD, PhD, FACS. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-16.

Sponsored by Yingbin Liu, MD, PhD, FACS · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2020; still recruiting 6 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
1,800
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Biliary tract carcinoma (BTC), including gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, ranks sixth in incidence among gastrointestinal malignancies and tenth in cancer-related mortality worldwide. Due to the lack of specific early symptoms, high malignancy, and frequent recurrence and metastasis, the rate of curative resection is only about 16.5%, and the overall 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. Early and accurate detection is therefore critical for improving patient outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a fraction of circulating free DNA (cfDNA), carries genetic and epigenetic information from tumor cells and can be detected even at the early stages of cancer development. Among various liquid biopsy biomarkers, ctDNA methylation shows particular advantages in sensitivity and specificity for early cancer detection and monitoring. This study aims to evaluate the application of cfDNA methylation liquid biopsy in the diagnosis and management of BTC.

Read the detailed description

Biliary tract carcinoma (BTC), encompassing gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Globally, it ranks sixth in incidence among gastrointestinal cancers and tenth in cancer-related mortality. BTC is characterized by the absence of specific early symptoms, high degree of malignancy, and a strong tendency for recurrence and metastasis. The curative resection rate remains around 16.5%, and the overall 5-year survival rate is less than 5%.

Biliary tract inflammation (such as cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune cholangitis) can lead to abnormal CA19-9 elevation. In addition, IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis often affects elderly patients and may mimic hilar cholangiocarcinoma, creating diagnostic challenges. Imaging alone often lacks accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant biliary lesions, resulting in misdiagnosis and inappropriate clinical decision-making. The number of patients with incidentally detected BTC during surgery is rapidly increasing, and reoperations impose substantial trauma and socioeconomic burden.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) refers to DNA fragments released into the bloodstream from tumor cells through apoptosis, necrosis, or secretion. ctDNA carries genomic alterations (point mutations, indels, CNVs, fusions), epigenetic modifications (DNA methylation [5mC], hydroxymethylation [5hmC]), and structural features (fragment length, fragmentation patterns). Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) represents the total extracellular DNA in plasma or serum, of which ctDNA accounts for less than 1%. Accumulating evidence shows that ctDNA is detectable in the early stages of tumorigenesis, highlighting its clinical potential in early detection, diagnosis, treatment guidance, and post-treatment monitoring.

The choice of biomarker type is key to liquid biopsy applications, and ctDNA methylation offers distinct advantages. Liquid biopsy analytes include circulating tumor cells (CTCs), ctDNA, exosomes, and microRNAs (miRNAs), each with unique detection characteristics. ctDNA, directly derived from tumor cells, provides relatively high sensitivity for early detection and is currently the most widely used target in clinical practice. Research on ctDNA has focused mainly on methylation, somatic mutations, and copy number variations. Among these, ctDNA methylation balances both signal abundance and signal strength, offering clear advantages over other approaches. Methylation analysis methods include restriction enzyme digestion, affinity enrichment, and bisulfite conversion. Among them, bisulfite-based approaches are the most established and widely used.

Therefore, the application of cfDNA methylation liquid biopsy in BTC for early screening, differential diagnosis, prognostic monitoring, and therapeutic guidance holds great significance for improving diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gall Bladder Cancer
  • Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (Icc)
  • Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
  • Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
  • Billiary Track Cancer
  • ctDNA

Keywords

  • ctDNA methylation
  • Early diagnosis
  • Liquid biopsy
  • Billiary Track Cancer
03

In context

Gallbladder Neoplasms

301 studies on the registry are indexed under Gallbladder Neoplasms; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,800 is above the median of 200 across 61 observational studies indexed under Gallbladder Neoplasms.

Browse Gallbladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Yingbin Liu, MD, PhD, FACS is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population comprises individuals meeting inclusion criteria and not meeting any exclusion criteria.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria Internal Training and Validation Cohorts

  • BTC patients

    1. Willing to voluntarily participate and able to comply with study procedures; if unable to read or sign, must be signed by a legally authorized representative (LAR).
    2. Age 18-80 years (inclusive).
    3. Able to provide required blood samples.
    4. confirmed biliary tract carcinoma (TNM stage I-IV).
    5. Stable vital signs; performance status 0-1.
    6. Adequate organ function: /ALT ≤ 5 × ; class A or B; WBC > 3 × 10⁹/L; ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L; ≥ 75 × 10⁹/L; ≥ 90 g/L; ≥ 60 mL/min; Total ≤ 3 × ULN.
  • Other gastrointestinal (to exclude BTC non-specific signals)

    1. Voluntary participation with signed informed consent (or by LAR).
    2. Age 18-80 years (inclusive).
    3. Able to provide required blood samples.
    4. Pathologically confirmed gastrointestinal malignancies other than BTC, including hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer (TNM stage I-IV).
    5. Stable vital signs; ECOG performance status 0-1.
  • Non-cancer participants (benign biliary disease)

    1. Able to provide written informed consent.
    2. Able to provide required blood samples.
    3. Age 18-80 years (inclusive).
    4. Pathologically or clinically diagnosed benign biliary diseases, including cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis, adenomyomatosis, gallbladder polyps, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, or primary sclerosing cholangitis.

External Validation Cohorts

  • BTC patients

    1. Voluntary participation with signed informed consent (or by LAR).
    2. Imaging findings of malignant biliary stricture or mass, or serum CA19-9 > 100 U/mL, highly suspicious for BTC, with planned surgery or for pathological confirmation.
    3. Age 18-80 years (inclusive).
    4. Able to provide required blood samples.
    5. Stable vital signs; ECOG performance status 0-1.
    6. Adequate organ function: AST/ALT ≤ 5 × ULN; Child-Pugh class A or B; WBC > 3 × 10⁹/L; ANC ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L; Platelets ≥ 75 × 10⁹/L; Hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L; Creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min; Total bilirubin ≤ 3 × ULN.
  • Healthy volunteers

    1. Able to provide written informed consent.
    2. Able to provide required blood samples.
    3. Age 18-80 years (inclusive).

Exclusion Criteria Training and Validation Cohorts

  • Cancer patients

    1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
    2. History of organ transplantation or prior allogeneic bone marrow/stem cell transplantation.
    3. Blood transfusion within 7 days prior to blood collection.
    4. History of curative cancer treatment within 3 years prior to blood collection.
    5. Use of anti-tumor drugs within 30 days prior to blood collection.
    6. Known bleeding disorders.
    7. Known diseases.
    8. Concurrent other malignancies or multiple primary tumors.
  • Non-cancer participants

    1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
    2. History of organ transplantation or prior allogeneic bone marrow/stem cell transplantation.
    3. Blood transfusion within 7 days prior to blood collection.
    4. History of any malignant tumor.
    5. Known bleeding disorders.
    6. Known autoimmune diseases.
    7. abnormalities on routine examination (excluding hepatitis, hepatic cysts, or benign pulmonary nodules).

External Validation Cohorts

  • Cancer patients

    1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
    2. History of organ transplantation or prior allogeneic bone marrow/stem cell transplantation.
    3. Blood transfusion within 7 days prior to blood collection.
    4. History of or ongoing curative cancer treatment within 3 years prior to blood collection.
    5. Use of anti-tumor drugs within 30 days prior to blood collection.
    6. Known bleeding disorders or autoimmune diseases.
    7. Concurrent other malignancies (including multiple primaries) or known cancer susceptibility gene carriers.
    8. Pathology confirmed benign disease after biopsy/surgery.
    9. Failure to confirm malignancy by pathology or imaging within 42 days after blood collection, or unclear lesion site/evidence.
    10. Special exclusion criteria:
  • Pathology confirmed precancerous lesions.
  • Any local/regional or systemic anti-tumor therapy (including surgery, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy) prior to blood collection.
  • Healthy volunteers

    1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
    2. History of organ transplantation or prior allogeneic bone marrow/stem cell transplantation.
    3. Blood transfusion within 7 days prior to blood collection.
    4. History of any malignant tumor.
    5. Known bleeding disorders or autoimmune diseases.
    6. Clinically significant abnormalities on health examination (excluding hepatitis, hepatic cysts, or benign pulmonary nodules).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
1,800 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • control(Internal training and validation sets)

    Healthy individuals Patients with pathologically confirmed benign biliary lesions Patients with other gastrointestinal malignancies

  • malignant(Internal training and validation sets)

    patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer

  • malignant (Independent validation set)

    patients with suspected biliary tract malignancies

  • control (Independent validation set)

    Healthy individuals

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of the ctDNA methylation model in biliary tract cancer

    Evaluate the overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ctDNA methylation liquid biopsy model in the diagnosis of biliary tract cancer (BTC).

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subtype-specific diagnostic performance

    Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ctDNA methylation model in gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Stage-specific diagnostic performance

    Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the model across BTC stages I-IV (TNM staging).

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Differential diagnosis

    Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ctDNA methylation model in distinguishing BTC from benign biliary lesions.

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    To assess the association between ctDNA methylation and PFS in BTC patients.

    Time frame: From date of diagnosis until documented progression or death, whichever occurs first, up to 5 years.

  2. Overall Survival (OS)

    To assess the association between ctDNA methylation and OS in BTC patients.

    Time frame: From date of diagnosis until death from any cause, up to 5 years.

  3. Recurrence monitoring performance

    Sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA methylation for monitoring recurrence and progression of biliary tract malignancies.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years post-treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200127, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chung DC, Gray DM 2nd, Singh H, Issaka RB, Raymond VM, Eagle C, Hu S, Chudova DI, Talasaz A, Greenson JK, Sinicrope FA, Gupta S, Grady WM. A Cell-free DNA Blood-Based Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med. 2024 Mar 14;390(11):973-983. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304714. PubMed 38477985 ↗
  • Nagino M, Hirano S, Yoshitomi H, Aoki T, Uesaka K, Unno M, Ebata T, Konishi M, Sano K, Shimada K, Shimizu H, Higuchi R, Wakai T, Isayama H, Okusaka T, Tsuyuguchi T, Hirooka Y, Furuse J, Maguchi H, Suzuki K, Yamazaki H, Kijima H, Yanagisawa A, Yoshida M, Yokoyama Y, Mizuno T, Endo I. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2019: The 3rd English edition. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Jan;28(1):26-54. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.870. Epub 2020 Dec 23. PubMed 33259690 ↗
  • Yang M, Zhao Y, Li C, Weng X, Li Z, Guo W, Jia W, Feng F, Hu J, Sun H, Wang B, Li H, Li M, Wang T, Zhang W, Jiang X, Zhang Z, Liu F, Hu H, Wu X, Gu J, Yang G, Li G, Zhang H, Zhang T, Zang H, Zhou Y, He M, Yang L, Wang H, Chen T, Zhang J, Chen W, Wu W, Li M, Gong W, Lin X, Liu F, Liu Y, Liu Y. Multimodal integration of liquid biopsy and radiology for the noninvasive diagnosis of gallbladder cancer and benign disorders. Cancer Cell. 2025 Mar 10;43(3):398-412.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2025.02.011. PubMed 40068597 ↗
  • Vogel A, Bridgewater J, Edeline J, Kelley RK, Klumpen HJ, Malka D, Primrose JN, Rimassa L, Stenzinger A, Valle JW, Ducreux M; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Biliary tract cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023 Feb;34(2):127-140. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.506. Epub 2022 Nov 10. No abstract available. PubMed 36372281 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2026, 74 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 10, 2025
First posted
Sep 16, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Mar 21, 2026
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2026
Last update
Sep 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07176962
Lead sponsor
Yingbin Liu, MD, PhD, FACS
Collaborators
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Xijing Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University, West China Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Fudan University
Responsible party
Yingbin Liu, MD, PhD, FACS (principal investigator, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 16, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 21, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2025

Study contacts

Yingbin Liu, PhD
Contact
laoniulyb@163.com
+86 13918803900
Yingbin Liu, PhD
principal investigator · RenJi Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion