ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07166536Updated Aug 12, 2026

Effect of Mental Imagery in Patients With Persistent Post-concussion Symptoms

An interventional study of Provocation Test for Symptoms Using Mental Imagery in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion, Post Concussive Syndrome, Chronic and Post Traumatic Headache, sponsored by Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Primary conditionPost-Concussion SyndromeRegistry: Brain ConcussionReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Brain Concussion — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Post-Concussion Syndrome
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Post-Concussion Syndrome, a narrower term within Brain Concussion.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) often results in persistent emotional, cognitive, and somatic symptoms-such as headaches and dizziness. These symptoms impose a significant burden, yet their underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

Predictive processing theories suggest that persistent symptoms may result from learned perceptual errors, particularly in individuals with high negative affectivity. This framework may help explain ongoing persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) in the absence of identifiable pathology, which have been linked to various psychological factors.

Mental imagery (MI) is thought to engage similar predictive processes. There is evidence that MI of symptom-triggering movements may exacerbate symptoms in individuals with chronic somatic conditions. However, this phenomenon has not been studied in PPCS patients. Investigating symptom provocation through MI may yield novel insights into the neuropsychological mechanisms sustaining PPCS and potentially contribute to the development of therapeutic tools for this population.

Objectives:

  1. Documenting the exacerbation of headache and dizziness following provocative mental imagery (imagery of movements or scenarios that elicit these symptoms in real life) in patients with PPCS.
  2. Comparing changes in headache and dizziness after provocative MI versus neutral MI (imagery of movements or scenarios that do not elicit these symptoms in real life).
  3. Comparing patients who experience symptom exacerbation following mental imagery to those who do not.
  4. Describing associations between symptom exacerbation and negative affectivity, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and lower daily functioning.

Methods: A single-group, open-label experimental provocation study is being conducted in adult patients with persistent post-concussive symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury. Each participant undergoes all imagery conditions, with the order of provocative and neutral mental imagery stimuli randomized within participants. Participants are recruited by convenience sampling from the computerized patient database of Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

After signing an informed consent form, participants will be invited to attend 2 to 3 sessions, each lasting 1 to 2 hours. During these sessions, a licensed physiotherapist will conduct a comprehensive clinical assessment, including: Completion of self-report questionnaires; A vestibular examination; Anamnestic interview and clinical assessment of individual movement- and scenario-related triggers for dizziness and headaches; Symptom provocation testing using mental imagery of the identified triggers.

Read the detailed description

Study Procedure

Phase 1 - Recruitment A sample will be drawn from the hospital's computerized database based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Phase 2 - Patient Enrollment Potential patients will be contacted by phone and given an extensive overview of the study. They will be invited to participate in the study, and will have to arive to Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital in Tel Aviv in order to sign an informed cosent form in front of a physician that will give them an additional explanation about the study and will answer all their questions and conserns. Current patients of Reut Rehabilitation Hospital will be invited to attend research sessions during their regular treatment days. Patients who have been discharged from the hospital will be invited to participate in research sessions at their convenience, with the option to schedule the first session shortly after signing the informed consent form.

Phase 3 - Medical Record Data Collection Data extraction from patients' medical records, including demographic information, injury date and mechanism, physical and cognitive consequences, additional symptoms, imaging findings, medical history, medication use, previous treatments, and social, psychological, or psychiatric status.

Phase 4 - Clinical Assessments Assessment Session 1

  • Cognitive screening test: In accordance with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) requirement, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be administered to provide a gross screening of cognitive status and to confirm eligibility for informed consent and study participation. Participants scoring \<20 points will be excluded.
  • Completion of self-reported questionnaires, including demographic information, symptoms and triggers, concussion symptomatology, dizziness-related disability, headache impact, catastrophizing, PTSD levels, anxiety, depression, negative affectivity and somatization.
  • Vestibular and oculomotor assessment, including the Video Head-Impulse Test (vHIT) to rule out central and peripheral vestibular pathology, conducted by a certified vestibular physiotherapist.

Assessment Session 2

  • Completion of the vestibular assessment and questionnaires (if not completed in Session 1).
  • Symptom provocation test using mental imagery in a randomized order:

    • Movement mental imagery: Randomized sequence of 2 provocative movements and 2 neutral movements for each symptom (headache and/or dizziness).
    • Scenario mental imagery: Randomized sequence of 2 provocative scenarios and 2 neutral scenarios for each symptom (headache and/or dizziness).

Assessment Session 3

  • Completion of pending assessments.

Phase 5 - Study Completion

02

Conditions studied

  • Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion
  • Post Concussive Syndrome, Chronic
  • Post Traumatic Headache

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • mild traumatic brain injury
  • Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms
  • mental imagery
  • concussion
03

In context

Post-Concussion Syndrome Reclassified

141 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Concussion Syndrome; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 52 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Post-Concussion Syndrome.

Browse Post-Concussion Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Compared within Post-Concussion Syndrome, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Brain Concussion. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Current patients of Reut Rehabilitation Hospital or individuals who were discharged from the hospital within the past 12 months.
  2. Diagnosis of mild Traumatic Brain Injury, concussion, blast injury, or cervical whiplash injury.
  3. More than 3 months since the event.
  4. Presence of headaches and/or dizziness that began after the injury and have persisted continuously or intermittently.
  5. Exclusion of other potential causes of headaches, such as non-healed fractures, chronic inflammation/infection, increased intracranial pressure, or meningeal injury.
  6. Headache intensity of at least 3/10 on the VAS scale.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Significant cognitive impairment preventing ( score \<20 or Montreal Cognitive Assessment score \<20, as per IRB requirements).
  2. Diagnosed central neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, stroke, or brain tumor.
  3. Presence of known pyramidal or extrapyramidal neurological signs.
  4. Significant language impairment interfering with communication.
  5. Psychiatric disorders significantly affecting communication.
  6. Use of vestibular-suppressant medication (e.g., Cinnarizine) with an inability or unwillingness to discontinue treatment 24 hours prior to testing.

Withdrawal Criteria:

1. Oculomotor dysfunction affecting multiple oculomotor functions.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mental Imagery Provocation Testing

    Provocation Test for Symptoms Using Mental Imagery: 1. Baseline symptom intensity (dizziness/headache) will be measured using the VAS scale. 2. Instruction to perform the movement that is hypothesized to provoke the symptom in reality for approximately 10-20 seconds 3. Measurement of symptom intensity using the VAS scale following the provoked movement. 4. Rest period of several minutes. 5. Measurement of symptom intensity following rest using the VAS scale. 6. Instruction to mentally imagine the movement or scenario hypothesized to provoke the symptom in reality for approximately 10-20 seconds 7. Measurement of symptom intensity using the VAS scale following mental imagery. 8. Measurement of imagery vividness using the VAS-V scale.

    Other: Provocation Test for Symptoms Using Mental Imagery

Interventions

  • OtherProvocation Test for Symptoms Using Mental Imagery

    • The mental imagery task will be guided by the examiner through continuous verbal instruction (the examiner will provide ongoing instructions throughout the entire task, not just at the beginning). During the instruction, the examiner will direct the participant's attention to visual, auditory, and proprioceptive aspects of the imagined movement or scenario. Example: "Close your eyes, and without moving your head or body at all, try to imagine that you are moving your head from side to side quickly and easily, while noticing the sensation of motion, seeing the rotation through your eyes, and feeling the acceleration of your head as it moves from side to side..."

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Headache intensity Change

    Measured on a 100mm Visual Analog Scale from 0 ("no Pain") to 100 ("most severe Pain")

    Time frame: Immediately before and after the intervention at assessment session 2

  2. Dizziness intensity change

    Measured on a 100mm Visual Analog Scale from 0 ("no dizziness") to 100 ("most severe dizziness")

    Time frame: Immediately before and after the intervention at assessment session 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Headache Impact on Daily life

    Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6): A brief assessment tool used to measure the impact of headaches on daily life. The questionnaire includes six questions addressing the frequency of functional impairment, pain intensity, and quality of life related to headaches

    Time frame: Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention

  2. Post-Concussion Symptoms

    Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ): A questionnaire assessing the severity of post-concussion symptoms. It includes 16 items where participants rate their symptoms compared to their pre-injury state on a Likert scale from 0 ("not experienced at all") to 4 ("severe problem").

    Time frame: Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention

  3. Perceived disability due to dizziness

    Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI): A questionnaire assessing the level of disability caused by dizziness. It consists of 25 items and provides a score in percentages, where 100% indicates a high level of perceived self-disability.

    Time frame: Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention

  4. Pain Catastrophizing

    Pain Catastrophizing Scale - A questionnaire assessing catastrophic thoughts related to pain, consisting of 13 items rated on a scale from 0 ("Never") to 4 ("Very much"). A high score indicates a tendency toward catastrophizing-exaggerated negative thoughts, helplessness, and magnification in response to pain.

    Time frame: Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention

  5. Anxiety

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): A 14-item questionnaire assessing anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) in medical patients. Each subscale consists of 7 items rated on a 0-3 Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention

  6. Depression

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): A 14-item questionnaire assessing anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) in medical patients. Each subscale consists of 7 items rated on a 0-3 Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention

  7. Positive and Negative Affect

    Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): A questionnaire assessing positive and negative emotions, consisting of 20 items divided into two subscales: positive affect and negative affect. Participants rate the intensity of emotions they experienced over a specified period on a Likert scale from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very much").

    Time frame: Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention

  8. PTSD symptom levels

    Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): A questionnaire assessing PTSD symptoms, including 20 items where participants rate symptom severity on a Likert scale from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much").

    Time frame: Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention

  9. Somatization

    Somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): A questionnaire that assesses the presence and severity of somatic symptoms. It includes 12 items related to physical complaints such as pain, gastrointestinal issues, and cardiopulmonary symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0-4 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater levels of somatization.

    Time frame: Within 1-2 weeks before the intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Polinder S, Cnossen MC, Real RGL, Covic A, Gorbunova A, Voormolen DC, Master CL, Haagsma JA, Diaz-Arrastia R, von Steinbuechel N. A Multidimensional Approach to Post-concussion Symptoms in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 19;9:1113. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01113. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30619066 ↗
  • de Neeling M, Liessens D, Depreitere B. Relationship between psychosocial and psychiatric risk factors and poor long-term outcome following mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2023 May;30(5):1540-1550. doi: 10.1111/ene.15713. Epub 2023 Feb 15. PubMed 36708085 ↗
  • Dijkstra N, Bosch SE, van Gerven MAJ. Shared Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception and Imagery. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 May;23(5):423-434. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 12. PubMed 30876729 ↗
  • Van den Bergh O, Witthoft M, Petersen S, Brown RJ. Symptoms and the body: Taking the inferential leap. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Mar;74(Pt A):185-203. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 17. PubMed 28108416 ↗
  • Moseley GL, Zalucki N, Birklein F, Marinus J, van Hilten JJ, Luomajoki H. Thinking about movement hurts: the effect of motor imagery on pain and swelling in people with chronic arm pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):623-31. doi: 10.1002/art.23580. PubMed 18438892 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 15 months after the start.

Of 54 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Post-Concussion Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 58. This study's planned 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 56 studies reached it within 40 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 69.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 3, 2025
First posted
Sep 10, 2025
StartActual
Sep 7, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Aug 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07166536
Lead sponsor
Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 10, 2025
Start date
Sep 7, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Yotam Yanai, BPT
Contact
yanayot@gmail.com
972523993918
Gali Pinsky, BPT
Contact
galipinsky95@gmail.com
972546326566
Keren Sivan-Speier, MD
principal investigator · Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion