ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07144059ECG-PHNMUpdated Dec 16, 2025

Impact of Non-medicalized ECG Practices Initiated by SAMU in Dispatch Strategies

An observational study in Acute Coronary Syndromes, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-16.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
350
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The performance of an ECG by non-medicalized prehospital teams (firefighters, first responders, paramedic ambulances) is developing across the territory to cope with the increasing demand (SAMU calls) for a service that cannot meet it (limited Mobile Emergency and Resuscitation Unit - SMUR - teams).

Early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome is key to appropriate management. A delay in care can quickly lead to complications ranging from rhythm disorders to cardiac arrest. Furthermore, as with reperfusion in strokes, the earlier reperfusion treatment is initiated, the greater the beneficial effect in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Moreover, the main elements for diagnosing STEMI in the prehospital setting remain the ECG, along with the anamnesis (medical history) and clinical examination (typical pain).

This is an observational, retrospective and single-center study (SAMU 91) carried out between September 1, 2023 and December 31, 2024. The inclusion criteria for our study were adult patients who had been regulated by SAMU 91 during a primary intervention and who had ST+ ACS registered in the eMUST registry. The main objective was to study the difference in the admission times of patients admitted to the emergency intensive care unit of cardiology or coronary angiography and presenting with ST+ ACS on the ECG performed by a primary SMUR team versus a non-medical team referred by the SAMU. The secondary objectives were to study the descriptive variables between the two groups (SMUR and non-medicalized vector), the typicity of pain, the mortality rate and the morbidity rate between the two groups.

Read the detailed description

The list of patients with ST+ ACS in department 91 during the year 2023 and 2024 were extracted from the E-Must registry (Registry for the Evaluation in Emergency Medicine of Therapeutic Strategies for Myocardial Infarction of less than 24 hours treated by the SAMU/SMUR of Île-de-France) and the missing information was retrieved via the SAMUScript medical regulation software (call schedules, address of the place of intervention,...)

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Coronary Syndromes

Keywords

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • infarct
  • STEMI
  • Electrocardiogram (ECG)
  • Coronary angiography
  • SAMU
  • SMUR
  • Non-medical vectors
03

In context

Acute Coronary Syndrome

1,488 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 350 is below the median of 500 across 590 observational studies indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients regulated by the SAMU 91 in primary intervention in the Essonne department with ST+ ACS and admitted to the ICU or coronary angiography department

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient
  • Patient regulated by the SAMU 91 between 09/2023 and 12/2024
  • Patient referred for coronary angiography for ST+ ACS
  • Patient registered in the E-Must register (Registry for the Evaluation in Emergency Medicine of Therapeutic Strategies for Myocardial Infarction of less than 24 hours treated by the SAMU/SMUR of Île-de-France)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary transport
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
350 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • EMS Vector

    Patients who had the qualifying ECG by the SMUR after medical interrogation by the SAMU

    Other: ECG by the SMUR after medical interrogation by the SAMU

  • ECG Vector: SP/Ambulances

    Patients who have called the emergency services with either an ECG performed by a non-medical vector (SP or ambulance), or a decision to reinforce SMUR during the first aid assessment

    Other: ECG performed by a non-medical vector

Interventions

  • OtherECG by the SMUR after medical interrogation by the SAMU

    Patients who had the qualifying ECG by the SMUR after medical interrogation by the SAMU

  • OtherECG performed by a non-medical vector

    Patients who have called the emergency services with either an ECG performed by a non-medical vector (SP or ambulance), or a decision to reinforce SMUR during the first aid assessment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Coronary Angiography or Cardiology Intensive Care Admission

    Time between the time of the call for help and the arrival in the coronary angiography department or cardiology intensive care unit

    Time frame: day 0

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Feb 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 10 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 20, 2025
First posted
Aug 27, 2025
StartEst.
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Dec 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07144059
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 16, 2025

Study contacts

Laurenne PARIS, MD
Contact
laurenne.paris@chsf.fr
01 69 13 95 79 ext. +33
Caroline TOURTE
Contact
caroline.tourte@chsf.fr
01 61 69 31 50 ext. +33
Patrick HU, MD
study director · Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion