ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07809100MIC-VADSUpdated Nov 6, 2026

Tumoral Versus Luminal Microbiome in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

An interventional study of Tissue and secretion sampling via biopsy and Tissue and secretion sampling via biopsy in Squamous Cell Cancer of Head and Neck (SCCHN), sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Updated Nov 6, 2026Start date movedPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), France's 5th most common cancer (15,000 annual cases), presents significant public health challenges due to high morbidity and functional/aesthetic sequelae from treatments (mutilating surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy). Major risk factors, tobacco and alcohol, create a chronic inflammatory environment promoting tumor development. The upper aerodigestive tract microbiome, influenced by these exposures and local alterations (necrosis, bleeding, ulcerations), is emerging as a potential factor in tumor progression, severity biomarker, or therapeutic target, though its exact role (cause or consequence) remains to be elucidated

Objectives:

  • Primary: Compare bacterial microbiome composition between tumor tissue, adjacent healthy mucosa, and pharyngeal secretions
  • Secondary:
  • Correlate microbiome diversity/composition with clinical and epidemiological characteristics
  • Identify microbiome variations by tumor stage, histology, and infiltration
  • Discover diagnostic/prognostic microbial markers
  • Analyze somatic variants (SNP/CNV) via whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and their association with microbiome profiles and clinical parameters

Study Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study with paired design (each patient serves as their own control to minimize genetic variation biases)

Methods:

  • Samples: Tumor, adjacent healthy tissue, and pharyngeal secretions (3 samples/patient)
  • Sequencing: Metagenomic sequencing (complete bacterial genomes) when biomass permits, or targeted 16S rRNA sequencing to identify dominant genera.
  • Pilot study: 20 patients to select the optimal technique and validate feasibility, particularly assessing DNA quantity in these low-biomass environments

Population: Adults with suspected HNSCC scheduled for panendoscopy

Exclusion criteria: Recent antibiotics/corticosteroids (12 weeks), immunosuppression (uncontrolled HIV, active hematologic malignancies, autoimmune diseases on immunosuppressants, organ/stem cell transplants, uncontrolled diabetes), immunomodulatory treatments (3 months), recurrence, pregnancy, non-French speakers, legal guardianship, or lack of social security.

Safety: No additional risks beyond standard panendoscopy.

Expected impact: This approach may pave the way for innovative diagnostic or therapeutic strategies based on microbiome modulation in HNSCC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Squamous Cell Cancer of Head and Neck (SCCHN)

Keywords

  • microbiota
  • SCCHN
  • metagenomics
  • RNA
  • ribosomal
03

In context

Neoplasms, Squamous Cell

111 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms, Squamous Cell; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 48 across 93 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms, Squamous Cell.

Browse Neoplasms, Squamous Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient
  • Consultation in the ENT department for suspected squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract scheduled for panendoscopy
  • Patient has provided consent to participate in the study and signed an form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Antibiotic or therapy within 12 weeks prior to consultation
  • Conditions associated with :

    • Uncontrolled infection (CD4 \< 200 cells/µL) (permanent exclusion)
    • Hematologic currently under treatment or not in complete remission for \<2 years
    • diseases under immunosuppressive treatment
    • Solid organ or stem cell transplant recipients (permanent exclusion)
    • Poorly controlled diabetes ( > 9%)
  • Immunomodulatory treatment within 3 months prior to consultation:

    • (e.g., anti-PD-1/PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4)
    • Biotherapy targeting the immune system (anti-TNF, anti-IL, calcineurin inhibitors, antimetabolites)
    • Recurrent upper aerodigestive tract cancer previously treated with surgery and/or radiochemotherapy
    • Pregnancy (confirmed prior to panendoscopy)
    • Patient who does not speak or understand French
    • Subject under guardianship or curatorship
    • Subject not affiliated with the national health insurance system
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Microbiome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Patients

    Patients with suspected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing panendoscopy with additional biopsy sampling of tumor tissue, adjacent healthy mucosa, and pharyngeal secretions for microbiome analysis

    Diagnostic Test: Tissue and secretion sampling via biopsy · Procedure: Tissue and secretion sampling via biopsy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testTissue and secretion sampling via biopsy

    Additional biopsies (beyond standard clinical practice) taken during panendoscopy to collect: * Tumor tissue * Adjacent healthy mucosa * Pharyngeal secretions These samples are used for microbiome analysis. head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Note: The panendoscopy itself is a standard clinical procedure, but the additional biopsies for research purposes represent the study-specific intervention.

  • ProcedureTissue and secretion sampling via biopsy

    Additional biopsies (beyond standard clinical practice) taken during panendoscopy to collect: * Tumor tissue * Adjacent healthy mucosa * Pharyngeal secretions These samples are used for microbiome analysis. head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Note: The panendoscopy itself is a standard clinical procedure, but the additional biopsies for research purposes represent the study-specific intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The difference in bacterial composition between the tumor, healthy mucosa, and hypopharyngeal secretions will be assessed

    Time frame: at day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlations between tumor microbiome diversity and composition and clinical/epidemiological data

    tumor microbiome diversity (by sequencing) tumor microbiome composition (by sequencing)

    Time frame: at day 1

  2. Differences in the tumor microbiome between subgroups defined by tumor stage, histological type, or infiltration, using differentiation tests

    Time frame: at day 1

  3. Differential bacterial genera or strains between tumor, healthy, and pharyngeal microbiomes

    Time frame: at day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026→Jan 1, 2027
Nov 6, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027→Feb 28, 2028
Nov 6, 2026
Study completion
Dec 31, 2027→Feb 28, 2028
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Start date Oct 1, 2026→Jan 1, 2027
    Primary completion Dec 31, 2027→Feb 28, 2028
    Study completion Dec 31, 2027→Feb 28, 2028
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07809100
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Renato TORRES, MD
Contact
renato.torres-lazo@chsf.fr
01 61 69 34 59 ext. +33
Caroline TOURTE
Contact
caroline.tourte@chsf.fr
01 61 69 31 50 ext. +33
Béatrice SEGURENS
study director · Phd, HDR

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion