CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07070973HEMOPECUpdated May 11, 2026

Proactive Hemodynamic Management During Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC

An interventional study of Assisted Fluid Management and Goal Directed Fluid Therapy (GDT) in Ovarian Cancer, Hemodynamic Instability and Fluid Overload, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-11.

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a complex surgical procedure carried out through laparotomic approach. After CRS-HIPEC morbidity and mortality rates go up to 20%-40% and 3% respectively, and acute kidney injury and pulmonary effusion/oedema are the most frequent postoperative complications.

Intraoperative hypotension and risk of fluid overload are common. Efficient and accurate control of arterial pressure and cardiac output is a major concern during CRS-HIPEC.

The aim of this study is to perform a pilot study describing a hemodynamic management protocol based on artificial intelligence - derived parameters, that allows to implement the standard goal directed therapy (GDT) protocol in term of amount of IOH and stroke volume (SV) optimization.

Specifically, this study aims to test the hypotheses that a hemodynamic protocol based on HPI-AFM monitoring compared to standard GDT helps clinicians reduce IOH during surgery and improve the time "in-target" range of SV index.

The study cohort will be compared to an historical cohort of 50 patients underwent to CRS-HIPEC between 2022 and 2024, managed with an institutional goal directed therapy protocol.

Read the detailed description

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a complex surgical procedure carried out through laparotomic approach. Intraoperative management represents a challenge for anesthesiologist: hemodynamic instability (due to extremely destructive surgery with fluids shift and blood loss), biochemical abnormalities (worsened by cytotoxic chemotherapic agents peritoneal infusion, with profound metabolic acidosis and electrolytes disturbance), and extreme thermal fluctuations related to the different phases of surgery.

CRS-HIPEC is fraught with significant drawbacks: morbidity and mortality rates go up to 20%-40% and 3% respectively, and acute kidney injury and pulmonary effusion/oedema are the most frequent postoperative complications. More than 70% of the patients are admitted in Intensive Care Unit after the surgery.

Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) during CRS-HIPEC is common, and as it is associated with the potential for harm [9]. At the same time, extensive fluid resuscitation in peritoneal cancer patients is associated with a poor postoperative outcome, and avoiding fluid overload is recommended. Optimizing flow and pressure requires repeated measurement of both variables and use of established protocols for vasopressor and fluid administration (the so called "individualized hemodynamic management") has been shown to be associated with decreased postoperative complications compared to routine care. Efficient and accurate control of arterial pressure and cardiac output is a major concern during CRS-HIPEC, because it requires frequent manual adjustments of vasopressor infusion rates and timely fluid administration.

A peculiar aspect of CRS-HIPEC is the delicate phase of intraoperative chemotherapy. During this procedure, hyperthermia and the extensive cytolysis caused by the chemotherapeutic drug lead to multifactorial metabolic acidosis and intense vasodilation: managing fluid therapy and vasoconstrictor drugs is often extremely challenging.

The aim of this study is to perform a pilot study describing a hemodynamic management protocol based on artificial intelligence - derived parameters, that allows to implement the standard goal directed therapy (GDT) protocol in term of amount of IOH and stroke volume (SV) optimization during CRS-HIPEC.

All patients included in the study will have a radial arterial catheter inserted before or immediately after anesthesia induction and connected to Hemosphere. The clinician will follow an algorithm based on Assisted Fluid Management (AFM) for fluid infusion and on Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) to titrate vasopressors and inotropes. AFM will be set as "medium" during cytoreductive phase and "restrictive" during HIPEC. A maximum volume of fluids per patients will be set at 10 ml/kg/hr.

Specifically, this study aims to test the hypotheses that a hemodynamic protocol based on HPI-AFM monitoring compared to standard GDT helps clinicians reduce IOH during surgery and improve the time "in-target" range of SV index (a value that estimates the time with SVI within target range, characterizing optimization of cardiac function), avoiding a detrimental fluid overload.

Two hierarchical primary endpoints were defined. The first primary endpoint will be the time-weighted average (TWA) - MAP less than 65 mmHg (expressed in mmHg) throughout surgery. The second primary endpoint will be the time spent during surgery in an optimized range of SVI (the "in target" range will be defined at the beginning of hemodynamic monitoring).

Secondary endpoints will be total norepinephrine dose and total amount of fluids.

Exploratory outcomes will be the fraction of AFM software-prompted boluses that resulted in the desired increase in SV, the incidence of post-operative complications (specifically postoperative Pulmonary Complications), ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) and the analysis of hospital costs related to the adoption of AFM software in the clinical practice of our hospital.

The study cohort will be compared to an historical cohort of 50 patients underwent to CRS-HIPEC between 2022 and 2024, managed with an institutional goal directed therapy protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Hemodynamic Instability
  • Fluid Overload
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age > 18 years
  • patient scheduled for CRS for ovarian cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients' refusal
  • cardiac arrythmia
  • pregnancy.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Proactive monitoring

    The patients will be managed following an algorithm based on Assisted Fluid Management (AFM) for fluid infusion and on Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) to titrate vasopressors and inotropes. AFM will be set as "medium" during cytoreductive phase and "restrictive" during HIPEC.

    Device: Assisted Fluid Management

  • Active comparator
    Goal Directed Fluid Therapy (GDT)

    The patients have been managed following institutional algorithm aimed to optimize stroke volume index and reduce intraoperative hypotension

    Other: Goal Directed Fluid Therapy (GDT)

Interventions

  • DeviceAssisted Fluid Management

    Intraoperative fluid infusion will be regulated according to the Assisted Fluid Management (AFM) software and on Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) will be used to titrate vasopressors and inotropes.

  • OtherGoal Directed Fluid Therapy (GDT)

    Institutional goal directed therapy protocol used to optimize SVI and reduce intraoperative hypotension

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. TWA-MAP<65mmHg

    We intend to define two hierarchical primary endpoints. The first primary endpoint will be the time-weighted average (TWA) - MAP less than 65 mmHg (expressed in mmHg) throughout surgery. The second primary endpoint will be the time spent during surgery in an optimized range of SVI (the "in target" range will be defined at the beginning of hemodynamic monitoring). The optimized range of SVI is the range between the patient's baseline SVI rate and the SVI obteined after a 250 ml fluid bolus.

    Time frame: Perioperative

  2. TIT-SVI

    We intend to define two hierarchical primary endpoints. The first primary endpoint will be the time-weighted average (TWA) - MAP less than 65 mmHg (expressed in mmHg) throughout surgery. The second primary endpoint will be the time spent during surgery in an optimized range of SVI (the "in target" range will be defined at the beginning of hemodynamic monitoring). The optimized range of SVI is the range between the patient's baseline SVI rate and the SVI obteined after a 250 ml fluid bolus.

    Time frame: Perioperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vasopressors

    Total norepinephrine dose

    Time frame: Perioperative

  2. Fluids

    Total amount of intraoperative fluids

    Time frame: Perioperative

Other outcomes

  1. AFM effectiveness

    The fraction of AFM software-prompted boluses that resulted in the desired increase in SVI

    Time frame: Perioperative

  2. PPCs

    Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications

    Time frame: Up to one month from the day of surgery

  3. Hospital costs

    Analysis of hospital costs related to the adoption of AFM software in the clinical practice of our hospital

    Time frame: At discharge to home

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HWR, Hermans RHM, de Hingh IHJT, van der Velden J, Arts HJ, Massuger LFAG, Aalbers AGJ, Verwaal VJ, Kieffer JM, Van de Vijver KK, van Tinteren H, Aaronson NK, Sonke GS. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):230-240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708618. PubMed 29342393 ↗
  • Ghirardi V, Trozzi R, Scanu FR, Giannarelli D, Santullo F, Costantini B, Naldini A, Panico C, Frassanito L, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Expanding the Use of HIPEC in Ovarian Cancer at Time of Interval Debulking Surgery to FIGO Stage IV and After 6 Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Analysis on Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 May;31(5):3350-3360. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15042-0. Epub 2024 Feb 27. PubMed 38411761 ↗
  • Wang JY, Gross M, Urban RR, Jorge S. Intraperitoneal and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024 Mar;25(3):313-329. doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01171-3. Epub 2024 Jan 4. PubMed 38270801 ↗
  • Kajdi ME, Beck-Schimmer B, Held U, Kofmehl R, Lehmann K, Ganter MT. Anaesthesia in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of a single centre three-year experience. World J Surg Oncol. 2014 May 1;12:136. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-136. PubMed 24886171 ↗
  • Mendonca FT, Guimaraes MM, de Matos SH, Dusi RG. Anesthetic management of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC): The importance of hydro-electrolytic and acid-basic control. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;38:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 10. PubMed 28719887 ↗
  • Esteve-Perez N, Ferrer-Robles A, Gomez-Romero G, Fabian-Gonzalez D, Verd-Rodriguez M, Mora-Fernandez LC, Segura-Sampedro JJ, Tejada-Gavela S, Morales-Soriano R. Goal-directed therapy in cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective observational study. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Apr;21(4):451-458. doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-1944-y. Epub 2018 Sep 14. PubMed 30218305 ↗
  • Lim MC, Chang SJ, Park B, Yoo HJ, Yoo CW, Nam BH, Park SY; HIPEC for Ovarian Cancer Collaborators. Survival After Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Primary or Interval Cytoreductive Surgery in Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2022 May 1;157(5):374-383. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0143. PubMed 35262624 ↗
  • Frassanito L, Giuri PP, Vassalli F, Piersanti A, Garcia MIM, Sonnino C, Zanfini BA, Catarci S, Antonelli M, Draisci G. Hypotension Prediction Index guided Goal Directed therapy and the amount of Hypotension during Major Gynaecologic Oncologic Surgery: a Randomized Controlled clinical Trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Aug;37(4):1081-1093. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01017-1. Epub 2023 Apr 29. PubMed 37119322 ↗
  • Desale MG, Tanner EJ 3rd, Sinno AK, Angarita AA, Fader AN, Stone RL, Levinson KL, Bristow RE, Roche KL. Perioperative fluid status and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Oct 28:S0090-8258(16)31501-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.027. Online ahead of print. PubMed 28029449 ↗
  • Bossy M, Nyman M, Madhuri TK, Tailor A, Chatterjee J, Butler-Manuel S, Ellis P, Feldheiser A, Creagh-Brown B. The need for post-operative vasopressor infusions after major gynae-oncologic surgery within an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) pathway. Perioper Med (Lond). 2020 Sep 7;9:26. doi: 10.1186/s13741-020-00158-0. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32939254 ↗
  • Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K; OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014 Jun 4;311(21):2181-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5305. PubMed 24842135 ↗
  • Joosten A, Hafiane R, Pustetto M, Van Obbergh L, Quackels T, Buggenhout A, Vincent JL, Ickx B, Rinehart J. Practical impact of a decision support for goal-directed fluid therapy on protocol adherence: a clinical implementation study in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Feb;33(1):15-24. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0156-x. Epub 2018 May 19. PubMed 29779129 ↗
  • Maheshwari K, Malhotra G, Bao X, Lahsaei P, Hand WR, Fleming NW, Ramsingh D, Treggiari MM, Sessler DI, Miller TE; Assisted Fluid Management Study Team. Assisted Fluid Management Software Guidance for Intraoperative Fluid Administration. Anesthesiology. 2021 Aug 1;135(2):273-283. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003790. PubMed 33901281 ↗
  • Wijnberge M, Geerts BF, Hol L, Lemmers N, Mulder MP, Berge P, Schenk J, Terwindt LE, Hollmann MW, Vlaar AP, Veelo DP. Effect of a Machine Learning-Derived Early Warning System for Intraoperative Hypotension vs Standard Care on Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension During Elective Noncardiac Surgery: The HYPE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1052-1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0592. PubMed 32065827 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07070973
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Responsible party
FRASSANITO LUCIANO (Dr Luciano Frassanito, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 17, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 11, 2026

Study contacts

Luciano Frassanito, MD
Contact
luciano.frassanito@policlinicogemelli.it
+393475256158
Luciano Frassanito
principal investigator · Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion