CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07051213BeSolveRDUpdated Jul 4, 2025

The Belgian Genome Resource to Resolve Rare Diseases

An interventional study of Whole exome sequencing and Whole genome Sequencing in Intellectual Developmental Disorder, Malformations and Dysmorphia, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-04.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2021, registered Jun 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
567
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Whole-exome (WES) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS) are recommended as first- or second-tier molecular tests for patients with developmental disorders (DD), but the clinical utility of WGS continues to be debated. This prospective randomized trial involving all Belgian Human Genetics centers compares the standard of care (SoC) - combining WES and microarray or shallow WGS - with WGS for 567 individuals with unexplained DD. The aim of the project is to pave the way towards diagnostic implementation of WGS for rare DD in Belgium. To reach this aim, (1) technical validation is performed at different genetic centres in Belgium, (2) clinical utility of WGS is explored and (3) the health economic impact is mapped.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intellectual Developmental Disorder
  • Malformations
  • Dysmorphia
  • Developmental Delay (Disorder)

Keywords

  • Whole Genome Sequencing
  • Whole Exome Sequencing
  • Rare Disease
03

In context

Intellectual Disability

363 studies on the registry are indexed under Intellectual Disability; 103 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 567 is above the median of 53 across 236 interventional studies indexed under Intellectual Disability.

Browse Intellectual Disability studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 928 studies on the registry; 261 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Intellectual disability/Developmental delay (moderate to profound)
  • Intellectual disability/Developmental delay (mild to moderate) AND family recurrence AND normal parents
  • Intellectual disability/Developmental delay (mild to moderate) AND dysmorphism (≥3 well documented minor signs)
  • One major malformation AND dysmorphism (≥3 well documented minor signs)
  • Multiple major malformations in 2 or more different organ systems.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspicion of an acquired cause, e.g. congenital infection and prenatal toxic exposure
  • Prior next-generation sequencing of a gene panel targeting multiple conditions or prior exome analyses
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
567 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care including Whole Exome Sequencing

    Standard of care consisting of a combination of a chromosomal microarray or shallow whole genome sequencing (standard of care copy number variant analysis in the concerned genetic center) with whole exome sequencing.

    Diagnostic Test: Whole exome sequencing

  • Experimental
    Whole Genome Sequencing

    Whole genome sequencing (primary analysis using a similar pipeline as the one used for whole exome sequencing - re-analysis using Emedgene to detect potential repeat expansions, structural and/or intronic variants)

    Diagnostic Test: Whole genome Sequencing

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testWhole exome sequencing

    Whole exome sequencing using Illumina short read sequencing

  • Diagnostic testWhole genome Sequencing

    Whole genome sequencing using Illumina short read sequencing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) performance compared to Whole exome sequencing (WES) performance

    The primary outcome measure is to determine whether whole genome sequencing is able to improve the diagnostic yield of next-generation sequencing for developmental disorders.

    Time frame: From enrollment to reporting the results of the analysis : target turn around time of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • KU Leuven
    Leuven, Belgium
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The raw sequencing data generated during this study will be shared on the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA).

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07051213
Lead sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Collaborators
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Erasme University Hospital, University Ghent, Universiteit Antwerpen, Université de Liège, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique Charleroi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 4, 2025
Start date
Jun 2, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 5, 2024
Completion
Jan 31, 2025
Last update
Jul 4, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion