ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07034144CDTDTMUpdated Jun 24, 2025

Chiropractic Care for Neck Pain: Comparing Diversified Technique and Drop Table Method

An interventional study of Drop Table Technique and Cervical Spine Manipulation in Spinal Manipulation, Neck Pain and Non Specific Neck Pain, sponsored by SEFA HAKTAN HATIK. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-24.

Sponsored by SEFA HAKTAN HATIK · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the effects of two different chiropractic techniques, Diversified and Drop Table, on pain levels, cervical joint range of motion, and neck muscle strength in individuals with non-specific neck pain.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of two chiropractic techniques - the Diversified Technique and the Drop Table Technique - in individuals with mechanical neck pain. Mechanical neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition associated with impaired cervical mobility, pain, and reduced quality of life.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three arms: (1) Diversified Technique group, (2) Drop Table Technique group, and (3) control group with no intervention. The interventions will be administered twice per week for four weeks by a chiropractor following standardized protocols. All participants will undergo evaluations at baseline and at the end of the 4-week intervention period.

The primary outcome measure is pain intensity and quality, assessed using the full version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), which evaluates sensory, affective, and evaluative components of pain. Secondary outcomes include cervical range of motion (CROM) and isometric neck muscle strength, measured with a goniometer and handheld dynamometer, respectively.

This study seeks to provide evidence on the comparative clinical effectiveness of two widely used chiropractic techniques for neck pain management. The findings may guide clinicians in selecting appropriate manual therapy approaches for patients with non-specific mechanical neck pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Manipulation
  • Neck Pain
  • Non Specific Neck Pain
  • Chiropractic

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chiropractic
  • Neck pain
  • Drop Table
  • Spinal Manipulation
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,360 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 50 across 1,116 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

SEFA HAKTAN HATIK is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Sign a voluntary form.
  • Be between 18 and 65 years of age.
  • Have previously consulted an orthopedist or physical therapist for neck pain.
  • Have no to chiropractic interventions.
  • Have no history of cervical surgery.
  • Report neck pain lasting longer than 7 days.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are under 18 or over 65 years of age.
  • Have experienced cervical trauma within the last month.
  • Have any systemic illness.
  • Have any for chiropractic intervention (e.g., brain tumor, cervical fracture).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Diversified Group

    Participants in this group will receive chiropractic treatment using the Diversified Technique. The intervention will be applied twice per week for 4 weeks by a chiropractor. The treatment will focus on cervical spine adjustments targeting areas of joint dysfunction associated with mechanical neck pain. Each session will last approximately 20 minutes. Standardized protocols will be followed to ensure consistency.

    Other: Cervical Spine Manipulation

  • Experimental
    Drop Table Group

    Participants in this group will receive chiropractic treatment using the Drop Table Technique. The intervention will be applied twice per week for 4 weeks by a chiropractor. The treatment will involve high-velocity, low-amplitude thrusts delivered with the assistance of a segmented drop table designed to reduce resistance and enhance precision during spinal adjustments. The focus will be on the cervical spine region related to mechanical neck pain. Each session will last approximately 20 minutes, following standardized protocols to ensure treatment consistency.

    Other: Drop Table Technique

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    This group did not undergo any interventions.

Interventions

  • OtherDrop Table Technique

    The Drop Table Technique is a chiropractic intervention that utilizes a segmented treatment table with adjustable sections that can be elevated slightly and then dropped. During the procedure, a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust is applied while the specific segment of the table drops slightly in coordination with the thrust. This technique aims to reduce the resistance experienced during the adjustment and to enhance the mechanical effect on targeted spinal joints. In this study, the Drop Table Technique will be specifically applied to the cervical spine to address mechanical neck pain. All applications will be performed by a licensed chiropractor using standardized positioning and adjustment protocols to ensure consistency across sessions.

  • OtherCervical Spine Manipulation

    Cervical spinal manipulation (SM) will be applied with the participant supine to restrictions found on motion palpation, following the technique described by Bergmann and Peterson. The participant's head and neck will be simultaneously rotated and laterally flexed over the contact point-specifically, the posterior supramastoid groove or zygomatic arch (C0-C1), the posterior aspect of the transverse process (C1-C2), or the posterior articular pillar of superior vertebrae (C2-C7)-to the end of passive range of motion (ROM). Subsequently, a high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust will be delivered in the direction of restricted movement. Participants with greater ROM restriction in the lateral plane will receive more laterally-to-medially directed thrusts. Participants with more restriction in rotation will be given thrusts in the direction of restricted axial rotation, and those with more restriction in extension will receive more anteriorly directed thrusts.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)

    Pain will be assessed using the full version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), which evaluates both the sensory, affective, evaluative, and miscellaneous components of pain. The MPQ includes: A list of 78 pain descriptors grouped into 20 categories, The Pain Rating Index (PRI), derived from the sum of rank values for selected descriptors, A Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score, rated on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 5 (excruciating), A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for overall pain intensity. The primary outcome will be the change in total PRI and PPI scores from baseline to the end of the 4-week intervention. Measure Type: Ordinal and Continuous (PRI: rank-based score; PPI: 0-5 scale) Unit of Measure: Score (no unit)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cervical Range of Motion

    Measured in degrees using a goniometer in all planes of cervical motion.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4th week

  2. Isometric Neck Muscle Strength

    Isometric neck muscle strength in flexion, extension, and right and left lateral flexion will be manually assessed using a microFET2 handheld dynamometer (Hoggan Health Industries).

    Time frame: Baseline and 4th week

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07034144
Lead sponsor
SEFA HAKTAN HATIK
Responsible party
SEFA HAKTAN HATIK (Asst. Professor, Sinop University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 24, 2025
Start date
Jun 14, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 14, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 14, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 24, 2025

Study contacts

SEFA H HATIK, Asst. Prof.
Contact
haktanhtk@gmail.com
+905058761553
ÖMER D KIZIL, PhD.
Contact
omerdiclekizil@gmail.com
+905415233691
SEFA H HATIK, Asst. Prof.
principal investigator · Sinop University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion