ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07025993Updated Jun 18, 2025

Effects of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Cervical and Scapulothoracic Stabilization Exercises in Upper Crossed Syndrome

An interventional study of Muscle Energy Technique and Eccentric muscle energy technique in Upper Cross Syndrome, sponsored by Riphah International University. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-18.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Jun 2025).
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 123 studies in Neck Pain by Riphah International University — 31 open to participants now, 31 under way, none of them phase 3. Neck Pain · Riphah International University.

Planned enrollment
75th of 117
34 · median 40
Started
2025
with 17 others
No phase
117 of 123
31 open now
Primary completion
2025-08
later than 11 of 30 live
Registered
97th of 123
by date

Among the 123 studies in Neck Pain by Riphah International University, this one is the 75th largest by planned enrollment of the 117 interventional ones, is one of 18 that started in 2025, is one of 117 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 11 of the 30 other live ones, and was the 97th registered.

By phase

123 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study117 · 31 open
Observational6 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2018; this study’s year is marked. 18 started in 2025.

Size and results

Median enrollment 40 across the 117 interventional studies, 114 across the 6 observational. Of the 86 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 123 studies in Neck Pain by Riphah International University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study will be a randomized clinical trial and will be conducted in Younus Hospital, Tehsil headquarters hospital Daska, and Riphah Rehabilitation Clinic Lahore. Non-probability consecutive sampling will be used to collect the data. A sample size of 40 subjects with an age group between 18-65 years will be taken. Data will be collected from the patients having present complaints of Neck pain associated with upper cross syndrome. Outcome measures will be taken using the Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) for pain and the Neck disability index (NDI) for neck functional health and craniovertebral angle for posture. An informed consent will be taken. Subjects will be selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and will be equally divided into two groups by a random number generator table. Both Groups will receive Moist Hot Pack, Cervical segmental mobilizations, and Free Neck Exercises (AROMs), while Group A will receive Muscle energy technique(eccentric muscle energy technique for the cervical spine with Mets for upper trapezius, Suboccipitalis and pectoralis muscle), and Group B will receive cervical and scapulothoracic stabilization exercises(axial elongation exercise, craniocervical flexion, cervical extension and Cervico-scapulothoracic stabilization exercises). Outcome measures will be measured at baseline and after 4 weeks. Data analysis will be done by SPSS version 25.

Read the detailed description

Neck pain is one of the most commonly occurring musculoskeletal disorders if left untreated can lead to severe complications. Cervical spine and soft tissue disorders e.g. muscles, ligaments, discs, facet joints, etc. are major causes of neck pain while neck pain caused by postural abnormality is termed as upper cross syndrome. Upper crossed syndrome (UCS) characterizes a prevalent postural dysfunction involving dysfunctional tone in the musculature of the neck, shoulders, and upper back that cross between the dorsal and the ventral sides of the body. This condition is given its name because an "X," in other words a cross, can be drawn across the upper body. One arm of the cross indicates the muscles that are typically tight/overly facilitated and the other arm of the cross indicates the muscles that are typically weak/overly inhibited. There are two types of muscles present in our body - the postural muscles such as pectoralis major, upper trapezius, and sternocleidomastoid, and other phasic muscles such as deep-neck flexors, and lower trapezius. In Upper Cross Syndrome (UCS) there is tightness of the upper trapezius and levator scapula on the dorsal side crosses with tightness of the pectoralis major and minor. Weakness of the deep cervical flexors, ventrally, crosses with weakness of the middle and lower trapezius. This pattern of imbalance creates joint dysfunction, particularly at the Atlanto-occipital joint, C4-C5 segment, cervicothoracic joint, glen humeral joint, and T4-T5 segment. Specific postural changes are seen in UCS, including forward head posture, increased cervical Lordosis and thoracic kyphosis, elevated and protracted shoulders, and rotation or abduction and winging of the scapulae. The main risk factor for developing UCS is maintaining an abnormal posture for a prolonged duration. Some daily activities that involve bad postures are often occupation-related. Repetitive tasks or continuous work for long hours can aggravate postural deviations. Because of increased work stress and a sedentary lifestyle, society is becoming more flexion-addicted attitude. In which people tend to frequently stoop forward. This is seen in office workers and students who tend to sit at a desk for prolonged periods, slouching forward to see the computer screen. Therefore, once muscle dysfunction starts, traditional muscle imbalance trends and altered posture follow. Head, neck structures can set limits on head's range of motion (ROM) and cause discomfort to the neck, mid-back muscle spasm/tightness, and decreased range of motion.

Understanding of which intervention yields better outcomes for pain relief, reduction in disability, and improvement in craniovertebral angle is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies for upper crossed syndrome patients. This study seeks to provide evidence-based guidance to clinicians regarding the most effective therapeutic approach. Considering the high prevalence of Upper Cross syndrome in the modern world, this study aims to check the effects of METs versus cervical and scapula-thoracic stabilization exercises on pain, disability and craniovertebral angle in patients with Upper Cross syndrome.

03

Conditions studied

  • Upper Cross Syndrome

Keywords

  • Posture
  • Neck Pain
  • Upper Cross Syndrome
  • Exercise
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both gender diagnosed with upper crossed syndrome
  • Patient having neck pain of 4 to 12 weeks
  • Pain reported on NRPS score ˃6/10 in the neck region
  • Subjects agree to sign the written consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria Patients were excluded if they were diagnosed with the following conditions for ˃6 months
  • Tuberculosis, carcinoma, heart disease, and osteoporosis
  • Neural disorders due to prolapsed intervertebral disc
  • Any trauma or localized infection in neck region
  • Upper motor neuron disease, cervical stenosis, and metabolic diseases in bone and joint
  • Hyper flexibility
  • Open sores
  • Ongoing radiotherapy, chemotherapy, therapy, or anticoagulants
  • Psychiatric diseases such as phobia/obsession and depression
  • Allergy to hot pack
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
34 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A

    Other: Muscle Energy Technique

  • Experimental
    Group B

    Other: Eccentric muscle energy technique

Interventions

  • OtherMuscle Energy Technique

    Eccentric muscle energy technique was applied to subjects' cervical spine. The cervical spine will brought to the barrier of motion in each plane i.e. flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation. Then subjects will asked to push their heads into the direction opposite that of the barrier. The therapist provided isometric resistance for 3- 5 seconds, after which the subjects relaxed their muscles completely and the therapist applied stretch.

  • OtherEccentric muscle energy technique

    Eccentric muscle energy technique was applied to subjects' cervical spine. The cervical spine will brought to the barrier of motion in each plane i.e. flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation. Then subjects will asked to push their heads into the direction opposite that of the barrier. The therapist provided isometric resistance for 3- 5 seconds, after which the subjects relaxed their muscles completely and the therapist applied stretch. Three to five repetitions will performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS)

    The patient's level of pain will be assessed using this scale. This scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain".

    Time frame: Baseline, 4th Week

  2. Neck disability index (NDI)

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's self-reported neck pain-related disability

    Time frame: Baseline, 4th Week

  3. Craniovertebral angle (CVA)

    The craniovertebral angle is identified as the intersection of a horizontal line passing through the C7 spinous process and a line joining the midpoint of the tragus of the ear to the skin overlying the C7 spinous process

    Time frame: Baseline, 4th Week

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mujawar JC, Sagar JH. Prevalence of Upper Cross Syndrome in Laundry Workers. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;23(1):54-56. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_169_18. PubMed 31040591 ↗
  • Chang MC, Choo YJ, Hong K, Boudier-Reveret M, Yang S. Treatment of Upper Crossed Syndrome: A Narrative Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;11(16):2328. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162328. PubMed 37628525 ↗
  • Ali S, Ahmad S, Jalal Y, Shah B. Effectiveness of Stretching Exercises Versus Muscle Energy Techniques in the Management of Upper Cross Syndrome: JRCRS. 2017; 5 (1): 12-16. Journal Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences. 2017;5(1):12-6

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2025, 5 months after the start.

Of 763 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neck Pain, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 772 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 11, 2025
First posted
Jun 18, 2025
StartActual
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2025
Last update
Jun 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07025993
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 18, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 18, 2025

Study contacts

Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD
Contact
shakil.urrehman@riphah.edu.pk
+92 345 7946009
Danish Hassan, PhD
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion