ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07025954Updated Jul 16, 2025

Planned Delivery at 37 Versus 36 Weeks in Pregnancies With Placenta Previaand Accreta

An interventional study of Cesarean delivery in Placenta Previa, Placenta Accreta Spectrum and Antepartum Bleeding, sponsored by The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Recruiting at 6 sites in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-16.

Sponsored by The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Current clinical practice guidelines recommend planned cesarean delivery(CD) at 34-37 weeks of gestation in pregnant women with placenta previa and accreta. Preterm birth may lead to neonatal immaturity, while laterCD may increase the risk of severe hemorrhage and surgery complications. Retrospective studies have shown that indicated CD occurs in approximately1/3 of patients before 36 weeks, with the main trigger being antepartum hemorrhage. However, the risk of antepartum hemorrhage is lower after 36 weeks. Recent study showed that delivery shifted from 34-36 weeks to 37 weeks did not increase therisk of maternal intraoperative/postoperative hemorrhage and emergency CD. To further validate this, we propose to conduct a randomized controlled study comparing the effect of planned delivery management strategies at 37 0/7-37 6/7 weeks of gestation with those at 36 0/7-36 6/7 weekson maternal and fetal outcomes. The aim of this study is to explore whether planned delivery up to 37 weeks in pregnant women with placenta previa and accreta improves neonatal outcomes without increasing maternal obstetric risks.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial, which aims to determine the optimal delivery timing for pregnant women with placenta previa and accreta. Participants were stratified by centers and randomly assigned in 1:1 at 28-34 weeks of gestation. Opaque sealed envelopes used to mask randomization sequences. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite neonatal morbidity rate, while the primary safety outcome is intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) during cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of unplanned cesarean delivery, hysterectomy rate, maternal ICU admission, total packed red blood cell transfusion (units), operative duration (hours), surgical complications, unplanned reoperation rate, postpartum morbidity, and neonatal NICU admission. Statistical analyses will be performed based on the intent-to-treat (ITT) principle using the full analysis set (FAS), with a supportive per-protocol (PP) analysis. The statisticians will remain blinded to group assignments through coded data until the final analysis is completed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Placenta Previa
  • Placenta Accreta Spectrum
  • Antepartum Bleeding
  • Emergency Cesarean Section
  • Preterm Birth Complication
03

In context

Placenta Previa

80 studies on the registry are indexed under Placenta Previa; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 109 across 45 interventional studies indexed under Placenta Previa.

Browse Placenta Previa studies →

Lead sponsor

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 28-34 weeks of gestation.
  • Both ultrasound and MRI indicate placenta previa with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
  • Planned to undergo cesarean delivery at the participating study hospitals.
  • Agree to participate and sign the form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple gestation.
  • Other obstetric complications (e.g., preeclampsia, vasa previa), and severe maternal medical conditions (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, progressive cardiovascular disease, active systemic lupus erythematosus, liver cirrhosis).
  • Major uterine structural anomalies (e.g., uterine didelphys, Uterine tumors ≥5 cm).
  • Estimated fetal weight \<3rd percentile for gestational age, major congenital anomalies, intrauterine fetal demise.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    37-week group

    Subjects were randomized 1:1 at 28-34 weeks. 37-week group: planned delivery at 37 0/7-37 6/7 weeksof gestation.

    Procedure: Cesarean delivery

  • Active comparator
    36-week group

    Subjects were randomized 1:1 at 28-34 weeks. 36-week group: planned delivery at 36 0/7-36 6/7 weeksof gestation.

    Procedure: Cesarean delivery

Interventions

  • ProcedureCesarean delivery

    All patients were delivered via cesarean section with standardized perioperative management, including preoperative preparation (e.g., autologous bloodreserve, corticosteroid administration for foetal lungmaturation, etc.), surgical approach, and postoperative care. Conservative management (intentional placental retention in situ with local resection and pelvic devascularization) was primarily employed, while peripartum hysterectomy was reserved for those with extensive invasion or failed conservative treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite neonatal morbidity

    The Composite neonatal morbidity was defined as any of the following: admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), need for mechanical ventilation (MV), Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Transient Tachypnea of Newborn (TTN), Necrotizing Enterocolitis (Necrotizing Enterocolitis), and necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC). Syndrome (RDS), Transient Tachypnea of Newborn (TTN), Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH), Septicemia (S), and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NE). IVH), sepsis (Sepsis), and neonatal death. Evaluator blinding was used to ensure the objectivity of the assessment, and the pediatrician responsible for assessing neonatal complications was unaware of the grouping information.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after childbirth

  2. Intraoperative Estimated Blood Loss (EBL)

    Intraoperative EBL was calculated during delivery using a combined gravimetric and volumetric method: all surgical gauzes and drapes were weighed before the procedure (preoperative weight), and blood-soaked gauzes and drapes were weighed postoperatively (postoperative weight); the baseline fluid volume in the suction canister was recorded before amniotic fluid aspiration, and the total volume was recorded immediately after completion of amniotic fluid aspiration (amniotic fluid volume = post-aspiration volume - baseline volume). The final EBL (ml)was calculated as: (postoperative weight - preoperative weight) + (total suctioned volume - amniotic fluid volume - irrigation fluid volume).

    Time frame: From surgery initiation to 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of unplanned cesarean delivery

    Unplanned cesarean delivery refers to all cesarean sections performed prior to the gestational age specified in the study protocol, including indications such as uncontrolled antepartum hemorrhage, preterm labor, fetal distress, and other complications requiring delivery before the designated gestational age.

    Time frame: Immediately after procedure

  2. Rate of Hysterectomy

    Hysterectomy refers to total or subtotal hysterectomy performed due to refractory hemorrhage during cesarean delivery or postpartum conservative treatment, excluding hysterectomies performed for conditions such as uterine tumors.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after childbirth

  3. Perioperative RBC transfusion (U)

    The cumulative unit of packed RBC transfused during hospitalization for delivery.

    Time frame: Perioperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 6 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 18 months after the start.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Placenta Previa, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 18 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 21, 2025
First posted
Jun 18, 2025
StartActual
Jul 12, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2027
Last update
Jul 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07025954
Lead sponsor
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Responsible party
wangzhijian (Professor, MD, PhD, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2025
Start date
Jul 12, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 16, 2025

Study contacts

Qingwen Nie
Contact
nieqingwen@126.com
+86 15622149953
Zhijian Wang, MD, PhD
principal investigator · The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion