CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07024836PRAGMATIC-DCEUpdated Jun 17, 2025

PRecision biomArker-Guided MAnagement of TuberculosIs Contacts: a Discrete Choice Experiment

An observational study in Tuberculosis (TB), sponsored by University College, London. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-17.

Sponsored by University College, London · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
430
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is part of a broader programme of work to develop and pilot a randomised-controlled trial of new tests to identify people who will benefit most from preventive treatment for tuberculosis (TB). The aim of the current study is to explore factors affecting patient decisions to start preventive treatment. The specific objectives are to understand how patients make decisions about preventive treatment initiation for TB (stage 1); and to design and conduct a "discrete choice experiment" survey to further evaluate preferences (stage 2).

Read the detailed description

We will perform up to 30 semi-structured interviews among people undergoing testing for latent TB infection, as part of routine clinical screening programmes (stage 1). Adults (aged ≥18 years) who have been or are being tested for LTBI in routine clinical services will be eligible for inclusion through purposive sampling. The findings from the qualitative study will then be used to inform the a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE will be conducted to quantify the trade-off between future TB risk and preventive treatment acceptance, from patient and healthcare provided perspectives (stage 2).

02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberculosis (TB)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • preference
  • discrete choice experiment
  • qualitative
  • latent tuberculosis infection
03

In context

Tuberculosis

1,417 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 430 is above the median of 250 across 421 observational studies indexed under Tuberculosis.

Browse Tuberculosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University College, London is the lead sponsor of 632 studies on the registry; 145 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  1. Adults tested, or eligible for testing, for latent tuberculosis infection in routine clinical services.
  2. Nurses, doctors or allied health professionals who have any experience of testing or treatment for TB or latent TB infection in UK services.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (aged ≥18 years) who have been tested for latent TB infection in routine clinical services, or are eligible for testing. Eligible people for testing include migrants from countries with high TB incidence (entered UK within 5 years), people with recent contact with a person with TB disease, and people eligible for LTBI screening prior to starting immunosuppression or through occupational health testing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
430 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patient participants for qualitative stage (stage 1)

    Semi-structured interviews will first be conducted among 20-30 people undergoing testing for latent tuberculosis infection, as part of routine clinical screening programmes (Stage 1).

  • Patient participants for discrete choice experiment (stage 2)

    200 patients will then undertake a quantitative discrete choice experiment to evaluate preferences and trade-offs that influence acceptance of preventive TB treatment.

  • Healthcare worker participants for discrete choice experiment (stage 2)

    200 healthcare workers will also undertake a quantitative discrete choice experiment to evaluate preferences and trade-offs that influence recommendation of preventive TB treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Preventive treatment acceptance

    Discrete choice experiment data will be analysed to evaluate the primary outcome of preventive TB treatment acceptance in the survey.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Whittington Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
    • Rubin Rose-Key · Contact · r.rose-key@ucl.ac.uk · 07771472837
    • Mahdad Noursadeghi · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymised data from the discrete choice experiment will be made publicly available at the time of peer-reviewed publication.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07024836
Lead sponsor
University College, London
Collaborators
University of Aberdeen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 17, 2025
Start date
May 22, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 17, 2025

Study contacts

Rishi K Gupta, PhD
Contact
r.gupta@ucl.ac.uk
020 3549 5979

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion