ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07013552ORI-4-CIEDiUpdated Jun 10, 2025

Oritavancin for CIED Infections With MDR Gram-positive Cocci

An interventional study of Administration of a single or repeated dose of a long half-life antibiotic - oritavancin and Administration of a repeated dose of a short half-life antibiotic - vancomycin in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections, Infective Endocarditis and Multidrug-resistant Bacteria Screening, sponsored by Medical University of Silesia. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-10.

Sponsored by Medical University of Silesia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aimed to conduct a randomized, non-inferiority controlled trial to compare the short- and medium-term efficacy and safety of two antibiotic dosage regimens in cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections with multidrug-resistant Gram-positive cocci: 1) single-dose therapy with a long-half-life antibiotic (oritavancin) vs. standard 7-14 days of therapy with a short-half-life antibiotic (vancomycin) for CIED surgical incision site or pocket infection; and 2) fractionated therapy with a long-half-life antibiotic (oritavancin) at seven-day intervals compared to standard therapy with a short-half-life antibiotic (vancomycin) fractionated in 2-3 daily doses in cases of lead-related infectious endocarditis.

Read the detailed description

Study Objectives:

This study's purpose is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two antibiotic dosage regimens in a pilot study of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-positive cocci.

Study Design:

This study is a single-center randomized, non-inferiority, control trial comparing the efficacy and safety of two antibiotic dosage regimens with a long-half-life antibiotic (oritavancin, experimental group) vs. standard therapy with a short-half-life antibiotic (vancomycin, control group).

Study Assumptions:

The investigators assumed that the efficacy of oritavancin therapy administered as a single intravenous infusion (for surgical incision site infection or pocket infection) or in fractionated doses administered at seven-day intervals (for lead-related infectious endocarditis) would be non-inferior to the efficacy of standard vancomycin therapy administered daily at 8-12 hour intervals and that there would be no difference in the safety profile between the two therapies.

Patient Population:

Patients aged ≥18 with CIED surgical incision site infection (i.e., superficial acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, ABSSSI) or deep infections of the generator pocket (PI) complicated or not with lead-related infectious endocarditis (LRIE) (optional) with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-positive cocci.

The planned size of the group in the pilot study is 50-100. The planned recruitment period is 15 months, and the observation period is 3 months.

Once all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are met, patients who have given written informed consent to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group to achieve a 1:1 group size ratio.

Intervention:

The diagnostic and surgical approach and the duration of antibiotic treatment will be determined depending on the etiological factor and clinical indications by the consensus of European Heart Rhythm Association and Heart Rhythm Society experts on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction and the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the treatment of infective endocarditis.

The intervention under investigation (experimental) will be administering a single or repeated dose of oritavancin.

The standard intervention will be administering of repeated doses of vancomycin.

Experimental group - Oritavancin dosage:

  1. in superficial ABSSSI: Single dose of 1,200 mg (3 vials) administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion in 5% glucose solution (infusion volume: 1,000 ml);
  2. in isolated PI: Single dose of 1,200 mg (3 vials) administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion in 5% glucose solution (infusion volume: 1,000 ml);
  3. in LRIE: First dose of 1,200 mg (3 vials) administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion in 5% glucose solution (infusion volume: 1,000 ml), subsequent doses of 800 mg (2 vials) administered as a 2-3 hour intravenous infusion at 7-day intervals, to achieve the required duration of drug therapy of 2-6 weeks (counted from the day of TLE).

Control group - Vancomycin dosage:

  1. in superficial ABSSSI: Repeated doses of 15-20 mg/kg body weight every 8-12 hours (maximum 3,000 mg/day for patients with normal renal function) administered as an hourly intravenous infusion in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (infusion volume: 500-1,000 ml), under monitoring the drug concentration in serum, for 7-10 days (calculated from the beginning of antibiotic therapy, not less than seven days from surgical tissue debridement, if required);
  2. in isolated PI: Repeated doses of 15-20 mg/kg body weight every 8-12 hours (maximum 3,000 mg/day for patients with normal renal function) administered as an hourly intravenous infusion in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (infusion volume: 500-1,000 ml), under monitoring the drug concentration in serum, for 10-14 days (counted from the day of surgical debridement of the generator pocket and TLE, if possible);
  3. in LRIE: Repeated doses of 15-20 mg/kg body weight every 8-12 hours (maximum 3,000 mg/day for patients with normal renal function) administered as an hourly intravenous infusion in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (infusion volume: 500-1,000 ml), under monitoring the drug concentration in serum, to achieve the required pharmacotherapy time of 2-6 weeks (counted from the day of surgical debridement of the incision site and TLE).

Observation:

Observation will include

  1. Physical examination with the assessment of the CIED implantation site;
  2. Routine laboratory tests, including blood count, C-reactive protein (mg/l), procalcitonin (ng/ml), plasma creatinine (mg/dl);
  3. Transthoracic echocardiogram with the assessment of bacterial vegetations;
  4. Transesophageal echocardiogram with the assessment of bacterial vegetations, with particular emphasis on the tricuspid valve and CIED leads;
  5. PET/CT examination with 18F-FDG or SPECT/CT using radioisotope-labeled leukocytes (depending on clinical indications).

Evaluation will be performed at 72-120 hours of therapy, after 5-7 and 14 days of therapy, and after 1 and 3 months of therapy, with endpoints assessed at 3 months.

Primary endpoints will include a complete cure rate and serious treatment-related adverse events at 3 months of follow-up.

Secondary endpoints will include clinical response rates, worsening or recurrence of infection despite drug therapy (including those resulting in rehospitalization and requiring alternative antibiotic therapy), and time to clinical response.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections
  • Infective Endocarditis
  • Multidrug-resistant Bacteria Screening
  • Gram Positive Bacterial Infection
  • Antibiotic Resistant Strain
  • Antibiotic Therapy
  • Healthcare Associated Infections

Keywords

  • Cardiac implantable electronic device
  • Gram-positive cocci
  • Health-care associated infections
  • Lead-related infective endocarditis
  • Multidrug-resistant bacteria
  • Pocket infection
03

In context

Endocarditis

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Endocarditis; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 92 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Endocarditis.

Browse Endocarditis studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Silesia is the lead sponsor of 115 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Completed 18 years of age
  2. Presence of signs and symptoms of superficial ABSSSI or PI in the form of a) redness/warmth/swelling/pain or b) separation of the edges of the surgical incision with signs of inflammation or the need for repeated surgical debridement of the wound or c) the presence of decubitus of the skin and subcutaneous tissue in area of the generator or skin abscess/erosion of the device pocket, with purulent discharge from the wound or discharge giving a positive microbial culture
  3. Probable/ definite diagnosis of right-sided LRIE according to modified Dukes criteria (optional criterion)
  4. Suspected/confirmed infection with drug-resistant Gram-positive cocci, i.e., Staphylococcus spp. (Stahphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci), Streptococcus spp. or Enterococcus spp. sensitive to oritavancin
  5. Suspected/confirmed infection with Gram-positive cocci, i.e., Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., sensitive to vancomycin or oritavancin and beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with a history of type I anaphylaxis to penicillin.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Suspected/confirmed infection with Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacilli or anaerobic bacteria
  2. Suspected/confirmed community-acquired infection or infection with Gram-positive cocci sensitive to betalactam antibiotics, including penicillin, ampicillin, or methicillin, based on empirical data or cultures (does not apply to patients with a history of type I anaphylaxis to penicillin)
  3. Confirmed resistance of Gram-positive cocci, which are the etiological factor of the infection, to vancomycin and oritavancin.
  4. History of to oritavancin or another lipoglycopeptide antibiotic (applies to the experimental group only)
  5. History of hypersensitivity to vancomycin or another glycopeptide antibiotics (applies to the control group only)
  6. No possibility of temporarily interrupting/initiating alternative therapy to intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin
  7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  8. Lack of informed written consent of the patient to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients treated with a long half-life antibiotic - oritavancin (Tenkasi)

    Patients with CIED infection with MDR Gram-positive cocci treated with a long half-life lipoglycopeptide antibiotic - oritavancin

    Drug: Administration of a single or repeated dose of a long half-life antibiotic - oritavancin

  • Active comparator
    Patients treated with a short half-life antibiotic - vancomycin (Vancomycin)

    Patients with CIED infection with MDR Gram-positive cocci treated with a short half-life glycopeptide antibiotic - vancomycin

    Drug: Administration of a repeated dose of a short half-life antibiotic - vancomycin

Interventions

  • DrugAdministration of a single or repeated dose of a long half-life antibiotic - oritavancin

    Intravenous administration of a single or repeated dose of lipoglycopeptide antibiotic - oritavancin. In superficial ABSSSI or PI: Single dose of 1,200 mg (3 vials) administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion in 5% glucose solution. In LRIE: First dose of 1,200 mg (3 vials) administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion in 5% glucose solution, subsequent doses of 800 mg (2 vials) administered as a 2-3 hour intravenous infusion at 7-day intervals, to achieve the required duration of drug therapy of 2-6 weeks (counted from the day of transvenous lead extraction).

  • DrugAdministration of a repeated dose of a short half-life antibiotic - vancomycin

    Intravenous administration of repeated doses of glycopeptide antibiotic - vancomycin. Repeated doses of 15-20 mg/kg body weight every 8-12 hours administered as an hourly intravenous infusion in 0.9% sodium chloride solution, under monitoring the drug concentration in serum, for 7-10 days in ABSSSI, for 10-14 days in PI, and for 2-6 weeks in LRIE (counted from the day of transvenous lead extraction).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Co-primary efficacy endpoint - treatment success rate

    Treatment success will be defined as obtaining a clinical response and no recurrence of infection at the same site or the site of CIED reimplantation within three months of F/U.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Co-primary safety endpoint - no treatment-related Serious Adverse Events

    Any adverse event classified as grade 3-5 according Health Technology Assessment report developed by the Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System (Poland) and related to using the investigational product (scores of 3-5) will be counted as a safety endpoint.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical response rate

    Clinical response will be defined as follows: 1. In the case of ABSSSI: a reduction in the size of the inflammatory lesion by at least 20% compared to the baseline after 48-72 hours of antibiotic therapy (in the case of conservative treatment) or the resolution of ABSSSI/complete healing of the surgical wound assessed after 7-10 days. 2. In the case of isolated PI: a resolution of fever and reduction of inflammatory parameters by ≥50% after 72-120 hours of antibiotic therapy and complete healing of the surgical wound assessed after 10-14 days. 3. In the case of PI complicated by LRIE: a reduction of inflammatory parameters by ≥50% after 72-120 hours of antibiotic therapy, negative control blood cultures after 72 hours, and resolution of fever by the 7th day, complete healing of the surgical wound after 10-14 days and resolution and absence of new echocardiographic signs of infection after the end of antibiotic therapy.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Median time to clinical response

    Median time to clinical response defined as above and given in hours or days (as required).

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Recurrent infection rate

    Recurrence of infection will be defined as CIED infection occurring within three months of the completion of previous treatment, caused by the persistence of bacteria with the same phenotype in the skin and subcutaneous tissue, the device pocket, intracardiac leads, the right-sided endocardium or tricuspid valve.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Rehospitalization rate due to recurrent infection

    Hospitalization due to recurrent infection will be defined as a hospital stay resulting from the need for repeated antibiotic administration or repeated surgical intervention related to recurrent infection in the form of ABSSSI, PI, or LRIE (as outlined in point 5).

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Proportion of cases in which infection worsened from superficial or local to systemic despite drug therapy

    A case in which an infection escalates from superficial or localized to systemic despite receiving drug therapy will be defined as a situation in which, after performing all planned initial tests, including transesophageal echocardiography and blood cultures, ABSSSI or PI will be diagnosed. However, during further follow-up, new clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, or imaging studies will indicate the development of LRIE.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Proportion of cases in which alternative "rescue" antibiotic therapy was used due to treatment failure

    Treatment failure was defined as a lack of clinical response or worsening of infection despite adequate antibiotic therapy and surgical treatment (if necessary) or the need for alternative "rescue" antibiotic therapy.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
    Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship 40-635, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gladysz-Wanha S, Joniec M, Wanha W, Pilat E, Drzewiecka A, Gardas R, Biernat J, Weglarzy A, Golba KS. Transvenous lead extraction safety and efficacy in infected and noninfected patients using mechanical-only tools: Prospective registry from a high-volume center. Heart Rhythm. 2024 Apr;21(4):427-435. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.12.015. Epub 2023 Dec 28. PubMed 38157921 ↗
  • Olsen T, Jorgensen OD, Nielsen JC, Thogersen AM, Philbert BT, Johansen JB. Incidence of device-related infection in 97 750 patients: clinical data from the complete Danish device-cohort (1982-2018). Eur Heart J. 2019 Jun 14;40(23):1862-1869. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz316. PubMed 31155647 ↗
  • Stewart CL, Turner MS, Frens JJ, Snider CB, Smith JR. Real-World Experience with Oritavancin Therapy in Invasive Gram-Positive Infections. Infect Dis Ther. 2017 Jun;6(2):277-289. doi: 10.1007/s40121-017-0156-z. Epub 2017 Apr 6. PubMed 28386776 ↗
  • Morrisette T, Miller MA, Montague BT, Barber GR, McQueen RB, Krsak M. On- and off-label utilization of dalbavancin and oritavancin for Gram-positive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Aug 1;74(8):2405-2416. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz162. PubMed 31322694 ↗
  • Rubino CM, Bhavnani SM, Moeck G, Bellibas SE, Ambrose PG. Population pharmacokinetic analysis for a single 1,200-milligram dose of oritavancin using data from two pivotal phase 3 clinical trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(6):3365-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00176-15. Epub 2015 Mar 30. PubMed 25824211 ↗
  • Carvalhaes CG, Sader HS, Streit JM, Castanheira M, Mendes RE. Activity of Oritavancin against Gram-Positive Pathogens Causing Bloodstream Infections in the United States over 10 Years: Focus on Drug-Resistant Enterococcal Subsets (2010-2019). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Feb 15;66(2):e0166721. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01667-21. Epub 2021 Nov 22. PubMed 34807761 ↗
  • Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, Pulcini C, Kahlmeter G, Kluytmans J, Carmeli Y, Ouellette M, Outterson K, Patel J, Cavaleri M, Cox EM, Houchens CR, Grayson ML, Hansen P, Singh N, Theuretzbacher U, Magrini N; WHO Pathogens Priority List Working Group. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):318-327. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3. Epub 2017 Dec 21. PubMed 29276051 ↗
  • Lupia T, De Benedetto I, Bosio R, Shbaklo N, De Rosa FG, Corcione S. Role of Oritavancin in the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis, Catheter- or Device-Related Infections, Bloodstream Infections, and Bone and Prosthetic Joint Infections in Humans: Narrative Review and Possible Developments. Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 6;13(4):959. doi: 10.3390/life13040959. PubMed 37109488 ↗
  • Thomas G, Henao-Martinez AF, Franco-Paredes C, Chastain DB. Treatment of osteoarticular, cardiovascular, intravascular-catheter-related and other complicated infections with dalbavancin and oritavancin: A systematic review. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Sep;56(3):106069. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106069. Epub 2020 Jun 27. PubMed 32603683 ↗
  • Esposito S, Blasi F, Curtis N, Kaplan S, Lazzarotto T, Meschiari M, Mussini C, Peghin M, Rodrigo C, Vena A, Principi N, Bassetti M. New Antibiotics for Staphylococcus aureus Infection: An Update from the World Association of Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA). Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Apr 12;12(4):742. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040742. PubMed 37107104 ↗
  • Corey GR, Arhin FF, Wikler MA, Sahm DF, Kreiswirth BN, Mediavilla JR, Good S, Fiset C, Jiang H, Moeck G, Kabler H, Green S, O'Riordan W; SOLO I, SOLO II Investigators. Pooled analysis of single-dose oritavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens, including a large patient subset with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Nov;48(5):528-534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Sep 13. PubMed 27665522 ↗
  • Giske CG, Turnidge J, Canton R, Kahlmeter G; EUCAST Steering Committee. Update from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Mar 16;60(3):e0027621. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00276-21. Epub 2021 Aug 4. PubMed 34346716 ↗
  • Delgado V, Ajmone Marsan N, de Waha S, Bonaros N, Brida M, Burri H, Caselli S, Doenst T, Ederhy S, Erba PA, Foldager D, Fosbol EL, Kovac J, Mestres CA, Miller OI, Miro JM, Pazdernik M, Pizzi MN, Quintana E, Rasmussen TB, Ristic AD, Rodes-Cabau J, Sionis A, Zuhlke LJ, Borger MA; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 14;44(39):3948-4042. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad193. No abstract available. PubMed 37622656 ↗
  • Milman A, Wieder-Finesod A, Zahavi G, Meitus A, Kariv S, Shafir Y, Beinart R, Rahav G, Nof E. Complicated Pocket Infection in Patients Undergoing Lead Extraction: Characteristics and Outcomes. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 29;12(13):4397. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134397. PubMed 37445433 ↗
  • Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Wilkoff BL, Berul CI, Birgersdotter-Green UM, Carrillo R, Cha YM, Clancy J, Deharo JC, Ellenbogen KA, Exner D, Hussein AA, Kennergren C, Krahn A, Lee R, Love CJ, Madden RA, Mazzetti HA, Moore JC, Parsonnet J, Patton KK, Rozner MA, Selzman KA, Shoda M, Srivathsan K, Strathmore NF, Swerdlow CD, Tompkins C, Wazni O. 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):e503-e551. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15. No abstract available. PubMed 28919379 ↗
  • Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Traykov V, Erba PA, Burri H, Nielsen JC, Bongiorni MG, Poole J, Boriani G, Costa R, Deharo JC, Epstein LM, Saghy L, Snygg-Martin U, Starck C, Tascini C, Strathmore N; ESC Scientific Document Group. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Europace. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):515-549. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz246. PubMed 31702000 ↗
  • Polewczyk A, Jachec W, Polewczyk M, Nowosielecka D, Brzozowski W, Kutarski A. Outcomes in patients with definite and possible infective endocarditis related to a cardiac implantable electronic device. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2024 Aug 8;134(7-8):16775. doi: 10.20452/pamw.16775. Epub 2024 Jun 17. PubMed 38895973 ↗
  • Bongiorni MG, Kennergren C, Butter C, Deharo JC, Kutarski A, Rinaldi CA, Romano SL, Maggioni AP, Andarala M, Auricchio A, Kuck KH, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C; ELECTRa Investigators. The European Lead Extraction ConTRolled (ELECTRa) study: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Registry of Transvenous Lead Extraction Outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2017 Oct 21;38(40):2995-3005. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx080. PubMed 28369414 ↗
  • Chmielarczyk A, Pomorska-Wesolowska M, Romaniszyn D, Wojkowska-Mach J. Healthcare-Associated Laboratory-Confirmed Bloodstream Infections-Species Diversity and Resistance Mechanisms, a Four-Year Retrospective Laboratory-Based Study in the South of Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 9;18(5):2785. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052785. PubMed 33803428 ↗
  • Joshi S, Shallal A, Zervos M. Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: Epidemiology, Infection Prevention, and Control. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;35(4):953-968. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2021.07.002. PubMed 34752227 ↗
  • Cerini P, Meduri FR, Tomassetti F, Polidori I, Brugneti M, Nicolai E, Bernardini S, Pieri M, Broccolo F. Trends in Antibiotic Resistance of Nosocomial and Community-Acquired Infections in Italy. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;12(4):651. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040651. PubMed 37107013 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The raw IPD data that underlie results in a publications will be openly available.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: A link to the IPD data that underlie results in a publication will be available immediately after the manuscript is accepted and published.

Access criteria: The raw IPD data and supporting Information will be openly available in the Polish Platform of Medical Research (https://ppm.edu.pl/search/researchdata?ps=20\&t=simple\&showRel=false\&lang=pl\&qp=\&cid=1577414) under the CC BY license.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07013552
Collaborators
Medical Research Agency, Poland
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 10, 2025
Start date
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2025

Study contacts

Danuta Loboda, MD, PhD
Contact
dloboda@sum.edu.pl
(+48) 32 359-89-90
Beata Sarecka-Hujar, Professor
Contact
bsarecka-hujar@sum.edu.pl
Beata Sarecka-Hujar, Professor
principal investigator · Department of Basic Biomedical Science, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia, Poland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion