ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07345325RIFREEUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Rifampin-free Regimen Versus Rifampin-containing Regimen in the Treatment of Staphylococcal Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Rifampin-free regimen and Rifampin containing regimen in Infective Endocarditis, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Recruiting at 31 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Updated Oct 21, 2026Site recruiting status changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
422
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that a rifampin-free regimen is non-inferior to the rifampin-containing regimen in terms of all-cause mortality in staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis within 6 months after randomization.

Read the detailed description

A rifampin-based treatment is recommended for prosthetic valve infective endocarditis caused by staphylococcus to act on the biofilm. However, the use of this molecule is associated with numerous adverse effects (digestive disorders, hepatotoxicity, hypersensitivity…) and drug interactions, particularly common in patients with prosthetic valves. In a retrospective study comparing patients receiving antibiotic therapy with rifampin versus without rifampin in staphylococcal prosthetic infective endocarditis (Le Bot et al. CID 2021, PMID: 32706879), there was no difference in terms of mortality or relapse between the two groups, but a longer hospital length of stay in the rifampin-treated group.

The aim of this multicentre randomized controlled trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a rifampin-free regimen compared to a rifampin-combined regimen.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infective Endocarditis

Keywords

  • infective endocarditis
  • prosthetic valve
  • Rifampin
  • Staphylococcus aureus
03

In context

Endocarditis

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Endocarditis; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 422 is above the median of 92 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Endocarditis.

Browse Endocarditis studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 839 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Definite infective endocarditis according to the 2023 Duke ISCVID criteria or confirmed by the endocarditis team if the endocarditis was classified as possible
  • Prosthetic valve endocarditis
  • At least one positive blood culture due to Staphylococcus sp (S. aureus or CoNS)
  • After the first positive blood culture, at least one negative blood culture (after a minimum of 72 hours of incubation)
  • Infective endocarditis due to Staphylococcus sp (S. aureus or coagulase negative staphylococci) susceptible to rifampin
  • Antistaphylococcal treatment for endocarditis introduced less than 14 days ago. We do not consider all antibiotic received before the first positive blood culture
  • Age ≥ 18-year-old
  • Informed, written consent obtained from patient or from patient's near in kin
  • Patient insured under a health insurance scheme
  • Patient with adequate measure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of cardiovascular implanted electronic device with suspected device-related IE without removal of the device
  • Expected duration of follow-up \<6 months at the time of randomization
  • Patient moribund (expected to die in next 48 hours with or without treatment)
  • Patients already receiving more than 72 hours of rifampin for the endocarditis treatment prior to randomization
  • Positive blood cultures less than 72 hours before randomization
  • Medical history of infective endocarditis in the last 3 months
  • True allergy to rifampin or a severe intolerance to rifampin
  • to rifampin
  • Patients requiring treatment contraindicated or not recommended with rifampin or incompatible with the inducer effect of rifampicin according to the marketing authorisation.
  • ALAT increase greater than 3 times the upper laboratory range
  • Extreme weight (\< 45 kg or > 150 kg)
  • Patients with confirmed prosthetic vascular graft infection or orthopedic-device-related infection
  • Patients treated with rifampin for infections other than endocarditis, such as tuberculosis
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding woman
  • Inclusion in another drug clinical trial
  • Patients who have already been included in the study for a previous episode of endocarditis
  • Patients under court protection, guardianship or trusteeship
  • Patients who do not speak or understand French language
  • Patient unable to collect information in a daily journal
  • Patient unable to understand a follow-up by phone contact
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
422 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rifampin-free regimen.

    The experimental arm of the study involves the removal of rifampicin from the antibiotic regimen recommended by the 2023 ESC (European Society of Cardiology) guidelines and the 2025 French guidelines (AEPEI/SPILF) for the treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis.

    Drug: Rifampin-free regimen

  • Active comparator
    Rifampin containing regimen

    Rifampin containing regimen (900 mg/day). Antibiotic treatment of endocarditis in accordance with the 2023 ESC guidelines and the 2025 French guidelines (AEPEI/SPILF).

    Drug: Rifampin containing regimen

Interventions

  • DrugRifampin-free regimen

    Rifampin-free regimen. The choice of other antibiotics is at the discretion of the physicians in charge but should be in accordance with the 2023 ESC guidelines and 2025 French guidelines (AEPEI/SPILF).

  • DrugRifampin containing regimen

    Rifampin containing regimen (900 mg/day). Antibiotic treatment of endocarditis in accordance with the 2023 ESC guidelines and 2025 French guidelines.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality rate at 6 months

    Deaths of all causes from randomizaton until 6 months

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Microbiological failure

    Proportions of patients with at least one microbiological failure defined by bacteremia with the primary pathogen obtained during follow-up but before the end of curative treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  2. Relapse

    Proportions of patients with at least one relapse defined by bacteremia with the primary pathogen obtained during follow-up after the end of treatment of endocarditis until 6 months, then until 12 months.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  3. Clinically evident embolic event

    Proportions of patients with at least one clinically evident embolic event (defined as secondary osteoarticular, splenic, brain or other symptomatic localizations) from randomization until 6 months.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  4. Valvular surgery

    Proportions of patients with at least one valvular surgery at 6 months and at 12 months

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  5. Clinical failure

    Proportions of patients with clinical failure (defined by a composite criterion: all-cause mortality or microbiological failure or relapse or embolic event or valvular surgery) at 6 months.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  6. Time to clinical failure

    Time between randomization and occurence of a clinical failure

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  7. Adverse events

    Proportions of patients with at least one adverse event grade III or IV related to treatment

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  8. Bleeding complications

    Proportions of patients with at least one bleeding complication

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  9. Lenght of stay in hospital

    Lenght of stay in hospital

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  10. Duration of curative antibiotic treatment for endocarditis

    Duration of curative antibiotic treatment for endocarditis

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  11. All-cause mortality rate at discharge, at 3 and at 12 months

    Deaths of all causes from randomization until discharge, then until 3 months and then until 12months

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  12. Readmission in hospitals

    Proportions of patients with at least one readmission in hospital (whatever the reason).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  13. Reclassification of relapse or microbiological failure as reinfection.

    Proportions of patients with reclassification of relapse or microbiological failure as reinfection. To determine the proportion of relapses or microbiological failures that are in fact reinfections, the genome of the strain isolated at the time of the suspected microbiological failure or relapse will be compared with the genome of the strain isolated at the time of the initial infection. This will be performed by the national reference center for staphylococci based in Lyon CHU.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  14. Cost-Effectiveness ratio

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) gained)

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

07

Study locations

29 of 31 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Sites
4 sites changed recruiting status (4 now recruiting)
Show 4 sites
  • CHR Orléans · Orléans, FranceNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • AP-HP, hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard · Paris, FranceNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • CHU St-Etienne · Saint-Etienne, FranceNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • CHU Besançon · Besançon, FranceNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
across 2 updates, Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 21, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    CHU Besançon is now Recruiting
  2. Oct 13, 2026
    3 sites changed recruiting status (3 now recruiting)
    Show 3 sites
    • CHR Orléans · Orléans, FranceNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • AP-HP, hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard · Paris, FranceNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • CHU St-Etienne · Saint-Etienne, FranceNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07345325
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 15, 2026
Start date
Jun 11, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 11, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 11, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Raphaël LECOMTE, MD
Contact
raphael.lecomte@chu-nantes.fr
02 40 08 31 12 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion