ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07012447Updated Jun 10, 2025

Venetoclax + Azacytidine for Newly Diagnosed ETP-like ALL and T-ALL With Myeloid Mutations

A Phase 2 interventional study of Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Early T Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, T-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia, T/Myeloid, Nos, sponsored by yuejun Liu. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-10.

Sponsored by yuejun Liu · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
14 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 17 studies testing venetoclax in Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma — 11 open to participants now, 13 under way, 1 of them phase 3. venetoclax · Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma.

Planned enrollment
8th of 17
32 · median 28
Started
2025
with 5 others
Phase 2
9 of 17
6 open now
Primary completion
2027-04
later than 3 of 12 live
Registered
14th of 17
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 17
yuejun Liu

Among the 17 studies testing venetoclax in Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, this one is the 8th largest by planned enrollment, is one of 6 that started in 2025, is one of 9 in phase 2, reaches primary completion later than 3 of the 12 other live ones, and was the 14th registered.

Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

420 studies on the registry are indexed under Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; 76 are open to participants now.

Browse Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma studies →

Open to participants now

11 of the 17 studies testing venetoclax in Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma are open now, in 12 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

5 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 11 open studies →

About venetoclax

venetoclax: first FDA approval 2016 (VENCLEXTA), first EMA approval 2016. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 60 Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma studies recruiting now, 24 (40%) set no upper age limit and 31 (52%) stop at 75 or younger; 36 take children under 18; 1 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 14 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 17 studies testing venetoclax in Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in treating newly diagnosed early T-cell precursor (ETP)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), T-ALL with myeloid mutations, or T/myeloid mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (T/My-MPAL).

Participant population: Patients aged ≥14 years diagnosed with ETP-like leukemia, T-ALL with myeloid mutations, or T/My-MPAL, regardless of sex/gender.

The main question it aims to answer: Does venetoclax plus azacitidine achieve a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR: CR + CRi) compared to historical controls (54% vs. 90%) after two induction cycles?

Comparison group: Researchers will compare ORR outcomes to historical data from conventional chemotherapy regimens to assess treatment superiority.

Participants will:

  • Receive two 28-day cycles of venetoclax (oral, 100 mg D1, 200 mg D2, 400 mg D3-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m²/day SC, D1-7).
  • Undergo serial bone marrow biopsies, blood tests, and imaging (e.g., PET-CT) for response assessment.
  • Follow dose adjustment protocols for toxicity management (e.g., neutropenia, thrombocytopenia).
Read the detailed description

This study addresses the unmet need for effective therapies in high-risk T-ALL subtypes, including ETP-like leukemia and T/My-MPAL, which exhibit myeloid-like genetic profiles (e.g., FLT3, DNMT3A, RUNX1 mutations) and poor outcomes under conventional chemotherapy (5-year OS \<40%). Preclinical and pilot clinical data demonstrate that venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, synergizes with azacitidine, a hypomethylating agent, to induce apoptosis in leukemia stem cells by targeting oxidative phosphorylation and epigenetic dysregulation. Building on a pilot study, this Phase II trial employs a single-arm design to validate efficacy in a larger cohort.

Patients receive two induction cycles of venetoclax (oral, 100 mg D1, 200 mg D2, 400 mg D3-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m² SC D1-7), with response assessed via bone marrow morphology, flow cytometry, and molecular testing (Days 22-35).

Early Efficacy Evaluation: After the first induction cycle (Days 22-35), response is assessed via bone marrow morphology, flow cytometry, and molecular profiling.

Stopping Criteria:

Patients failing to achieve at least partial remission (PR) after Cycle 1 will be withdrawn from the study.

Patients failing to achieve CR or CRi at the end of Cycle 2 will also discontinue study treatment.

Consolidation strategies include allo-HSCT or high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) for fit patients or maintenance therapy for unfit individuals.

Rigorous safety monitoring follows NCI-CTCAE v5.0 criteria, with dose adjustments for hematologic/non-hematologic toxicities.

Statistical analysis includes intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations, with ORR analyzed via exact binomial tests and survival endpoints via Kaplan-Meier/Cox regression. The study integrates translational biomarkers (e.g., BCL-2 expression, mutational profiling) to identify predictors of response, aiming to establish a novel, mechanism-driven regimen for these aggressive leukemias.

03

Conditions studied

  • Early T Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
  • T-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
  • Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia, T/Myeloid, Nos

Keywords

  • Adverse risk
  • newly diagnosed
  • induction therapy
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. No gender restrictions
  2. Age ≥ 14 years
  3. Confirmed diagnosis of one of the following:

    ETP-like leukemia (CD7⁺, CD1a-, CD8-, with CD5 expression stratified as ETP-ALL ≤75% or Near-ETP-ALL >75%) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) with myeloid mutations (including FLT3, DNMT3A, STAG2, IDH1/2, RUNX1, EZH2, WT1, ASXL1/2, SF3B1, TET2, BCOR, BCORL1, and MLL-PTD) T/myeloid mixed phenotype acute leukemia (T/My-MPAL) (with concurrent T-lineage and myeloid markers, e.g., cCD3⁺/mCD3⁺, CD7⁺, MPO⁺)

  4. Newly diagnosed patients without prior induction therapy Limited prior therapy allowed: hydroxyurea, dexamethasone, or low-dose cytarabine/venetoclax (cumulative dose \<0.5g), and leukocytapheresis
  5. Expected survival time ≥ 3 months
  6. Liver function: total ≤ 2× ; /AST ≤ 3× ULN (or ≤ 5× ULN if liver infiltration by leukemia is present) ; Renal function: endogenous ≥ 30 ml/min; Cardiac function: > 45%
  7. Demonstrated capacity to understand the study and willingness to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of recurrent genetic abnormalities such as t(8;21), t(15;17), inv(16)/t(16;16) leukemia
  2. Prior to study drugs or compounds of similar chemical structure
  3. Active uncontrolled infections as determined by the investigator
  4. Active bleeding
  5. Recent history (within 1 year) of thrombosis, embolism, or cerebral hemorrhage
  6. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or unwillingness to use in women of
  7. Drug addiction or chronic alcoholism that could interfere with trial evaluation
  8. Psychiatric disorders or other conditions that would prevent obtaining or compliance with trial requirements
  9. Any condition deemed unsuitable for trial participation by the investigator
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Investigational ( venetoclax, azacytidine)

    Two cycles induction as venetoclax (oral, 100 mg D1, 200 mg D2, 400 mg D3-28) and azacitidine (75 mg/m² SC D1-7); Consolidation: For fit patients, if those with MRD (Minimal Residual Disease) are negative or refuse to undergo allo-HSCT (Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation), intermediate-dose (2g/m² q12h, days 1-3) cytarabine-based therapy is administered for 3-4 cycles; if patients are MRD-positive, they undergo allo-HSCT. For unfit patients, each venetoclax combined with azacitidine treatment cycle is anticipated to be 28 days in length until progression of disease, although cycle delays may occur due to delayed blood count recovery.

    Drug: Venetoclax · Drug: Azacitidine · Drug: Cytarabine

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall response rate (ORR) after two treatment cycles of induction therapy

    Rates of complete remission (CR), and complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)

    Time frame: time from the date of enrollment to 2 cycles of induction before consolidation therapy(100 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. OS: overall survival

    time from the date of enrollment to death from any cause or the last follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. LFS:leukemia-free survival

    the duration from the date of enrollment to the occurrence of treatment failure, relapse, death from any cause, or the last follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. DOR: duration of remission

    Time between the first remission and relapse

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. AE

    Adverse events during the induction treatment.

    Time frame: Within 60 days after treatment

  5. Volume of infused blood products

    The volume of infused blood products during the induction treatment.

    Time frame: Within 60 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ethical Committee of the First Affliated Hospital of Soochow University
    Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China
    Recruiting
    • Zhou-lin Lu · Contact008613914086271
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 41 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, half reached primary completion within 64 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 43 and three quarters within 97. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 63 months; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 97.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 21, 2025
First posted
Jun 10, 2025
StartActual
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2028
Last update
Jun 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07012447
Lead sponsor
yuejun Liu
Responsible party
yuejun Liu (Physician, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 10, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2025

Study contacts

Yue-jun Liu
Contact
liuyuejun@suda.edu.cn
008613915535177
Yue-jun Liu
principal investigator · The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Venetoclax · Azacitidine

Start the discussion