An interventional study of MIGS in Glaucoma, sponsored by iSTAR Medical. Recruiting at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.
Sponsored by iSTAR Medical · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a prospective, multi-center, international, cohort expansion study. Part 1 will be conducted in subjects with open angle glaucoma to identify the best insertion tool for MINIject S+. In Part 1, three different investigational insertion tools will be used to place MINIject implants in this first-in man study. Each arm represents a different version of the insertion tool. Subject and independent central reader will be blinded to the insertion tool used to implant MINIject S+. Part 2 will be an expansion phase where the selected insertion tool will be assessed in a larger population of subjects with open angle glaucoma and operable cataracts undergoing combined glaucoma and cataract surgery (with IOL implantation).
1,419 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 223 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 61 across 964 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.
Browse Glaucoma studies →iSTAR Medical is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Part 2 Only: The following intraoperative criteria following the IOL implantation need to be met in order for investigator to proceed with the device placement:
Exclusion criteria
Subjects are not eligible for inclusion in this clinical investigation if one or more of the following criteria are met:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
HbA1c
A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
One version of delivery tool
Device: MIGS
One version of delivery tool
Device: MIGS
One version of delivery tool
Device: MIGS
Implant MINIject S+ in supraciliary space
Number of patients with correct placement of the device in the supraciliary space, as assessed by the blinded central reader
Correct placement at 1 Week will be assessed by SS-AOCT/UBM images, analyzed by an independent central reader.
Time frame: 1 week
Ease of use evaluation
Ease of Use, as measured by sponsor review of the surgical procedure and surgeon feedback.
Time frame: during the surgery procedure
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
Best corrected visual acuity measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Change from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up will be evaluated.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months
Rate of secondary surgical interventions at Month 6, Month 12 and Month 24
Cumulative rate of secondary surgical interventions due to the glaucoma device or related to glaucoma surgical procedure at Month 6, Month 12 and Month 24.
Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
Change in Endothelial Cell Density from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
Change from baseline in endothelial cell density (ECD), measured at Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months
Cumulative Rate of Adverse Events at 6, 12 and 24 months.
Cumulative rate of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) at 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Proportion of eyes achieving ≥20% reduction in diurnal IOP from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
Proportion of study eyes achieving ≥ 20% reduction in diurnal IOP from baseline to 6 months follow-up, and from baseline to 12- and 24-months follow-up, with or without IOP lowering medications.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24 months
'Qualified success' rate from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
'Qualified success' rate at 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-up. 'Qualified success' is defined as a diurnal IOP ≤ 21mmHg and \> 5mmHg with a minimum 20% diurnal IOP reduction from baseline at a given follow-up visit.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
'Complete success' rate from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
'Complete success' rate at 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up. 'Complete success' is defined as diurnal IOP ≤ 21mmHg and \> 5mmHg with a minimum 20% diurnal IOP reduction from baseline without the need for any IOP-lowering medication at the given follow-up visit.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in diurnal IOP from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up
Change (absolute and relative) in diurnal IOP from baseline visit to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in number of IOP-lowering medication from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up.
Change (absolute and relative) in number of IOP-lowering medications from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24-months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
iSTAR Medical