ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07009236STAR VIIUpdated Oct 22, 2026

A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of MINIject S+ in Subjects With Open Angle Glaucoma

An interventional study of MIGS in Glaucoma, sponsored by iSTAR Medical. Recruiting at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by iSTAR Medical · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Updated Oct 22, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multi-center, international, cohort expansion study. Part 1 will be conducted in subjects with open angle glaucoma to identify the best insertion tool for MINIject S+. In Part 1, three different investigational insertion tools will be used to place MINIject implants in this first-in man study. Each arm represents a different version of the insertion tool. Subject and independent central reader will be blinded to the insertion tool used to implant MINIject S+. Part 2 will be an expansion phase where the selected insertion tool will be assessed in a larger population of subjects with open angle glaucoma and operable cataracts undergoing combined glaucoma and cataract surgery (with IOL implantation).

02

Conditions studied

  • Glaucoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • MINIject
03

In context

Glaucoma

1,419 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 223 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 61 across 964 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.

Browse Glaucoma studies →

Lead sponsor

iSTAR Medical is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males or females, 20 years of age or older
  2. Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma (OAG) in the study eye
  3. Iridocorneal angle grade 3 (open, 20-35 degrees) or grade 4 (wide open, 35-45 degrees) according to Shaffer Angle Grading System in all quadrants of the study eye. (For subject's undergoing combined cataract extraction (with IOL implantation) with MINIject implantation, a grade 2 angle is acceptable prior to cataract surgery so long is the angle becomes grade 3 or greater prior to MINIject implantation).
  4. Glaucoma not adequately controlled with at least one topical hypotensive medication(s), unless the subject has an allergy / intolerance to a medication or inability to consistently access medication. Examples include but are not limited to prostaglandins, beta blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors or alpha-2-agonists
  5. Minimal visual acuity in the study eye must be 35 letters EDTRS (20/200) or better and 50 letters ETDRS (20/100) or better in the fellow eye
  6. Maximal C/D ratio must be 0.9 in the study eye
  7. Subjects must be willing and able to follow study instructions and to return for scheduled study-related examinations
  8. Subjects must provide written prior to any study procedures
  9. Part 2 Only: Operable age-related cataract eligible for phacoemulsification surgery with Intraocular Lens (IOL) implantation
  10. Part 2 Only: The following intraoperative criteria following the IOL implantation need to be met in order for investigator to proceed with the device placement:

    1. Capsulorhexis is intact and centered
    2. Posterior capsular bag is intact
    3. The IOL is well-centered in the capsular bag
    4. There is no evidence of zonular dehiscence/rupture
    5. The Anterior Chamber (AC) angle was able to be clearly visualized using direct gonioscopy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Subjects are not eligible for inclusion in this clinical investigation if one or more of the following criteria are met:

  1. Grade 2 (narrow, 20 degrees), grade 1 (extremely narrow, less or equal to 10 degrees) and grade 0 (closed or slit) iridocorneal angle according to Shaffer Angle Grading System in the study eye except for the situation described in inclusion criterion #3.
  2. Any eye surgery that was performed \< 90 days before Screening/Baseline visit in the study eye
  3. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus with >7%
  4. Known or suspected allergy or to medical silicone
  5. Allergy to fluorescein
  6. Corneal opacity or iridocorneal angle not visible through gonioprism in the study eye, preventing correct placement of the implant
  7. Central endothelial cell density (ECD) at Screening visit with a mean value \<1900 cells/mm2 or coefficient of variation (CV) of endothelium >0.45 A variance of 5% less than this cell count is permitted if in the clinical judgement of the Investigator the potential benefit/risk to subject participation is favorable and the central corneal endothelial morphology is characterized as normal by the usual criteria of hexagonality, polymorphism, and polymegathism
  8. Anticipated need for ocular surgery or retinal laser procedure in the study eye
  9. Anterior chamber anatomic configuration of high risk for development of angle closure glaucoma in the study eye,
  10. Pre-existing ocular or systemic pathology that, in the opinion of the investigator (reason to be specified on the case report form), is likely to cause post-operative complications following implantation
  11. Central corneal thickness greater than 600 microns
  12. degenerative visual disorders that, in the opinion of the investigator, can impact study examinations (e.g. exudative macular degeneration or other retinal disorders)
  13. Clinically significant corneal disease (e.g., corneal dystrophy) in the study eye
  14. Evidence of crystalline lens subluxation or luxation in the study eye
  15. Inability to perform Visual Field (VF) testing in either eye
  16. Evidence of vitreous loss in the anterior chamber in the study eye
  17. Clinically significant intra-ocular inflammation or infection
  18. Presence of silicone oil in the study eye
  19. Participation in any study involving a drug or device within the past 3 months and planned participation to any other study during the present study. There is no exclusion period after completion of the present trial
  20. Only for women of : positive pregnancy test at Screening/Baseline visit. Pregnant or lactating women
  21. Subject is under tutorship or trusteeship
  22. Subject has a condition such that his / her ability to provide personal is compromised
  23. Diagnosis of cataract in the study eye that is not age-related e.g., traumatic, inflammatory or resulting from diabetes in the study eye
  24. Unable to discontinue anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy (i.e. acetylsalicylic acid, coumadin, heparin, apixaban, etc.) for the surgical procedure. The amount of washout and when to restart therapy after surgery is at the Principal Investigator's discretion and may be based on literature references (see Annexes) or in consultation with the subject's primary care team.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Investigational device FG300X

    One version of delivery tool

    Device: MIGS

  • Active comparator
    Investigational device FG300Y

    One version of delivery tool

    Device: MIGS

  • Active comparator
    Investigational device FG300Z

    One version of delivery tool

    Device: MIGS

Interventions

  • DeviceMIGS

    Implant MINIject S+ in supraciliary space

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with correct placement of the device in the supraciliary space, as assessed by the blinded central reader

    Correct placement at 1 Week will be assessed by SS-AOCT/UBM images, analyzed by an independent central reader.

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Ease of use evaluation

    Ease of Use, as measured by sponsor review of the surgical procedure and surgeon feedback.

    Time frame: during the surgery procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up

    Best corrected visual acuity measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Change from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months

  2. Rate of secondary surgical interventions at Month 6, Month 12 and Month 24

    Cumulative rate of secondary surgical interventions due to the glaucoma device or related to glaucoma surgical procedure at Month 6, Month 12 and Month 24.

    Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months

  3. Change in Endothelial Cell Density from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up

    Change from baseline in endothelial cell density (ECD), measured at Month 6, Month 12, and Month 24.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months

  4. Cumulative Rate of Adverse Events at 6, 12 and 24 months.

    Cumulative rate of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) at 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up.

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months

  5. Proportion of eyes achieving ≥20% reduction in diurnal IOP from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up

    Proportion of study eyes achieving ≥ 20% reduction in diurnal IOP from baseline to 6 months follow-up, and from baseline to 12- and 24-months follow-up, with or without IOP lowering medications.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24 months

  6. 'Qualified success' rate from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up

    'Qualified success' rate at 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-up. 'Qualified success' is defined as a diurnal IOP ≤ 21mmHg and \> 5mmHg with a minimum 20% diurnal IOP reduction from baseline at a given follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months

  7. 'Complete success' rate from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up

    'Complete success' rate at 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up. 'Complete success' is defined as diurnal IOP ≤ 21mmHg and \> 5mmHg with a minimum 20% diurnal IOP reduction from baseline without the need for any IOP-lowering medication at the given follow-up visit.

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months

  8. Change in diurnal IOP from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up

    Change (absolute and relative) in diurnal IOP from baseline visit to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months

  9. Change in number of IOP-lowering medication from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up.

    Change (absolute and relative) in number of IOP-lowering medications from baseline to 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24-months

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 2026→Dec 2026
Oct 22, 2026
Study completion
Jul 2028→Dec 2028
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    Primary completion Aug 2026→Dec 2026
    Study completion Jul 2028→Dec 2028
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07009236
Lead sponsor
iSTAR Medical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 6, 2025
Start date
Sep 29, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Delphine Hanot Mambres, PhD
Contact
delphine.hanot@istar-medical.com
0032472384955
Sabine Glibert
Contact
sabine.glibert@istar-medical.com
0032476609408

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion