ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07329803PRIDEUpdated Jan 12, 2026

Pre-cut Versus Intentional Double Guidewire for ERCP Cannulation: Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Precut Sphincterotomy and Double Guidewire Technique in ERCP, Choledocholithiasis and Biliary Drainage, sponsored by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-12.

Sponsored by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
840
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an indispensable therapeutic procedure in the management of a wide spectrum of pancreaticobiliary disorders, including choledocholithiasis, benign and malignant biliary strictures, pancreatic ductal obstructions, and postoperative bile leaks. The procedure has revolutionized the management of these conditions, often obviating the need for surgery.Precut papillotomy and Double Guidewire Technique (DGT) are both salvage techniques used in ERCP when standard biliary cannulation fails.

Precut (Needle-Knife Precut): An endoscopic incision made into the papilla to gain access to the bile duct when conventional methods fail.

Intentional Double Guidewire Technique (DGT): A technique where a guidewire is intentionally placed into the pancreatic duct to act as a "guide" or anchor, straightening the biliary axis and allowing a second guidewire to be inserted into the bile duct.

02

Conditions studied

  • ERCP
  • Choledocholithiasis
  • Biliary Drainage
  • Biliary Strictures Caused by Malignant Neoplasms
  • Biliary Stricture

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Selective CBD cannulation
  • Post ERCP Pancreatitis
  • Precut Sphincterotomy
  • Double Guidewire Technique
03

In context

Choledocholithiasis

109 studies on the registry are indexed under Choledocholithiasis; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 840 is above the median of 100 across 76 interventional studies indexed under Choledocholithiasis.

Browse Choledocholithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India is the lead sponsor of 135 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Age > 18 years.

  • Valid indication for ERCP (benign or malignant obstruction).
  • Native papilla (no prior sphincterotomy).
  • Difficult Biliary Cannulation (DBC) defined by ESGE "5-5-2" criteria:
  • > 5 minutes of cannulation attempts.
  • > 5 contacts with the papilla.
  • > 1 inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ampullary mass or tumor preventing standard cannulation view.

    • Surgically altered anatomy (e.g., Billroth II, Roux-en-Y).
    • Uncorrectable coagulopathy ( > 1.5 or \< 50,000).
    • Acute pancreatitis present prior to ERCP.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
840 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Precut Sphincterotomy Arm

    Participants undergo biliary cannulation using precut sphincterotomy as the initial rescue cannulation technique during ERCP.

    Procedure: Double Guidewire Technique

  • Active comparator
    Double Guidewire Technique Arm

    Participants undergo biliary cannulation using the double guidewire technique, with placement of a guidewire in the pancreatic duct followed by attempted biliary cannulation during ERCP.

    Procedure: Precut Sphincterotomy

Interventions

  • ProcedurePrecut Sphincterotomy

    Precut sphincterotomy is an endoscopic rescue cannulation technique in which a needle-knife or similar cutting instrument is used to incise the papillary or periampullary tissue to facilitate access to the bile duct during ERCP.

  • ProcedureDouble Guidewire Technique

    The double guidewire technique is an endoscopic rescue cannulation method in which a guidewire is placed into the pancreatic duct to stabilize the papilla, followed by attempted biliary cannulation alongside the pancreatic duct guidewire during ERCP.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safe Success

    SUCCESS: Deep cannulation of the Common Bile Duct (CBD) achieved using the randomized technique within 15 minutes. * AND ABSENCE OF Post ERCP adverse events. Post ERCP adverse events include Post ERCP Pancreatitis, Hemorrhage, cholangitis and perforation.

    Time frame: 30 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

    Incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, defined as new or worsened abdominal pain with serum amylase or lipase ≥3 times the upper limit of normal at ≥24 hours after ERCP, requiring hospitalization or prolongation of planned admission.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Severity of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

    Severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to the revised Atlanta classification.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Overall ERCP-Related Adverse Events

    Incidence of ERCP-related adverse events, including bleeding, perforation, cholangitis, and post-ERCP pancreatitis, graded according to the ASGE lexicon.

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Cannulation Time

    Time required to achieve deep biliary cannulation, measured from insertion of the duodenoscope into the second part of the duodenum to successful deep bile duct cannulation.

    Time frame: During the ERCP procedure

  5. Total Procedure Time

    Total ERCP procedure duration, measured from duodenoscope insertion to scope withdrawal.

    Time frame: During the ERCP procedure

  6. Need for Rescue Cannulation Technique

    Proportion of patients requiring crossover to an alternative rescue cannulation technique after failure of the initially assigned technique.

    Time frame: During the ERCP procedure

  7. Hyperamylasemia Without Clinical Pancreatitis

    Incidence of asymptomatic hyperamylasemia, defined as serum amylase or lipase ≥3 times the upper limit of normal without clinical features of pancreatitis.

    Time frame: At 24 hours after ERCP

  8. Hospital Length of Stay

    Duration of hospital stay measured in days from ERCP to hospital discharge

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after ERCP

  9. 30-Day All-Cause Readmission

    Rate of hospital readmission for any cause after ERCP.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after ERCP

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2026; primary completion for Feb 2027, 13 months later.

Of 41 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Choledocholithiasis, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 43 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 26, 2025
First posted
Jan 9, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 25, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 28, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 28, 2027
Last update
Jan 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07329803
Responsible party
Mohan Ramchandani (Consultant Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 9, 2026
Start date
Jan 25, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 12, 2026

Study contacts

DR SHUJAATH ASIF, MD,DM
Contact
Asif.shujaath@gmail.com
9600037286
DR SHUJAATH ASIF, MD,DM
principal investigator · Asian Institute Of Gastroenterology Private Limited

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion