CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06988839RT1Updated Jun 12, 2026

Effect Of Microneedling With Coronally Advanced Flap For Management of RT1 Gingival Recession In Thin Gingival Phenotype

An interventional study of Microneedling followed by coronally advanced flap and Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in Gingival Recession, sponsored by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak. Recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-12.

Sponsored by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the effect of microneedling to increase the gingival tissue thickness which could improve the outcome of root coverage in coronally advanced flap procedure in thin gingival phenotype. The main question it aims to answer is that :

Does the use of microneedling procedure followed by coronally advanced flap has similar outcomes of root coverage in recession type 1 (RT1) gingival recession i.e. buccal gingival recessions without interdental clinical attachment loss in thin gingival phenotype as compared to coronally advanced flaps with connective tissue graft.

Systemically healthy patients having isolated upper RT1 gingival recession will be assigned into two groups. Microneedling will be performed in one group (4 sessions each at a 10 days interval) followed by coronally advanced flap operation (at an interval of 2 months) and coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft will be performed in the other group. Follow-up will be done at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months for evaluation of primary and secondary outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The gingival phenotype affects the choice of mucogingival surgical technique for coverage of the root surface in gingival recession. It has been reported that a flap thickness of > 0.8 mm results in a covered root surface of 100%, whereas a flap thickness of \< 0.8 mm results in partial root coverage in coronally advanced flap procedure for Miller class I or II root coverage. Thus connective tissue graft (CTG) use is advocated in thin phenotype cases, for improved clinical and esthetic outcomes. Connective tissue graft increases the predictability of coronally advanced flap. Treatment by addition of connective tissue graft has some drawbacks like creation of a second surgical site, postoperative discomfort and long chair side time, leading the researchers to explore techniques less invasive in nature.

Microneedling (MN), also known as "percutaneous collagen induction therapy." It creates microinjuries that result in minimal superficial bleedings and create a wound-healing cascade from which various growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factors, transforming growth factors, connective tissue growth factor and fibroblast growth factors, are released. In microneedling, the tissue responds as if experiencing minor trauma and the body's own collagen production is induced to preserve skin integrity. Microneedling as opposed to connective tissue grafts is a non-surgical approach to increase gingival thickness, that results in significant changes in the gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width of individuals with thin gingival phenotype. It is associated with higher patient acceptance, lesser surgical site co-morbidities and is a minimally invasive yet an effective approach to augment the gingiva. The histological analysis performed one year post microneedling sessions, showed increased collagen and elastic fiber accumulation in the reticular dermis, a thickened epidermis and a normal stratum corneum, showing its greater effect on gingival thickness.

The present study aims to increase the gingival thickness by microneedling procedures to enhance root coverage by coronally advanced flap procedures in thin gingival phenotype. This technique is proposed to improve thin gingival phenotype by minimally invasive and non-surgical means.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gingival Recession

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • gingival recession
  • percutaneous collagen induction
  • root coverage
  • connective tissue graft
  • microneedle
03

In context

Gingival Recession

402 studies on the registry are indexed under Gingival Recession; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is above the median of 30 across 368 interventional studies indexed under Gingival Recession.

Browse Gingival Recession studies →

Lead sponsor

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak is the lead sponsor of 209 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of isolated RT1 buccal maxillary gingival recessions in esthetic zone with thin gingival phenotype (Gingival thickness≤1mm) associated with esthetic complaints and/or dental sensitivity and otherwise systemically healthy.
  • Gingival Recession ≥2mm , Keratinized tissue width≥2mm and clinically identifiable cementoenamel junction
  • Age 20years-50 years
  • Patient demonstrating compliance for maintaining good oral hygiene after Phase 1 therapy Plaque index (PI) \<1, Gingival Index (GI) \<1
  • Providing a written and verbal informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with systemic disease that can influence the outcome of therapy.
  • Pregnant females or on oral contraceptive pills or hormone replacement therapy.
  • Smokers and patients undergoing orthodontic therapy
  • Physically and mentally impaired patients.
  • Non vital, malpositioned tooth
  • Presence of cervical abrasions or restorations in the area
  • Previous history of periodontal surgery on the involved sites.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Microneedling with coronally advanced flap

    In this group, microneedling will be performed using a 30 gauge lancet needles, inserted until hard tissue is felt. It will be performed in 4 sessions at 10 day intervals, followed by coronally advanced flap procedure, 2 months post microneedling.

    Procedure: Microneedling followed by coronally advanced flap

  • Active comparator
    Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft

    Coronally advanced flap operation will be performed with connective tissue graft harvested from palate after phase 1 therapy.

    Procedure: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft

Interventions

  • ProcedureMicroneedling followed by coronally advanced flap

    Microneedling will be performed using a 30 gauge lancet needles, inserted until hard tissue is felt. It will be performed in 4 sessions at 10 day intervals, followed by coronally advanced flap procedure, 2 months post microneedling.

  • ProcedureCoronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft

    Coronally advanced flap operation will be performed with connective tissue graft harvested from palate after phase 1 therapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recession depth (RD)

    It will be recorded in mm with a periodontal probe from the CEJ to the crest of the gingival margin at the mid-labial region

    Time frame: Baseline,1,3,6 months

  2. Recession width (RW)

    It will be recorded in mm with a periodontal probe from the mesial to distal gingival margin at the level of cementoenamel junction.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 , 3 and 6 months

  3. Root coverage percentage (RC%)

    It will be calculated according to formula Root coverage percentage= RD (preop -postop) \*100 /RD preoperative

    Time frame: Baseline ,1,3 and 6 months

  4. Root Esthetic Score (RES)

    The RES system evaluates 5 variables 6 months following surgery: gingival margin, marginal tissue contour (MTC), soft tissue texture (STT), Mucogingival junction alignment, and gingival color (GC). 0, 3, or 6 points will be used for the position of the gingival margin, whereas a score of 0 or 1 point will be used for each of the other variables

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  5. Patient-centered outcomes

    Each patient will be questioned about his/her satisfaction with regard to following criteria: root coverage attained, dentinal hypersensitivity, shape and contour of gums, surgical procedure, and post-surgical phase and it will be assessed using a three-point rating scale.

    Time frame: Baseline,1,3 and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Attachment level (CAL)

    Clinical attachment level will be measured as the distance between the CEJ and the base of pocket. Measurements will be made at 6 sites of each tooth using periodontal probe.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 , 3 ,6 months

  2. Probing pocket depth

    Probing pocket depth will be measured as the distance from gingival margin to the base of pocket. Measurements will be noted at 6 sites of a tooth.

    Time frame: Baseline,1 ,3 and 6 months

  3. Plaque index

    Plaque index will be measured on buccal and lingual surface with Periodontal probe.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 ,3 and 6 months

  4. Gingival index

    Gingival index will be used to assess severity of gingival inflammation with the help of periodontal probe at 4 sites.

    Time frame: Baseline,1,3 and 6 months

  5. Gingival thickness

    A No:15 endodontic spreader with silicon disc as stopper will be inserted perpendicularly at 1.5mm apical to gingival margin, till the hard tissue will be felt. The depth of penetration will be noted using digital calliper measuring the distance between the tip of the spreader and silicon disc.

    Time frame: Baeline, 1 ,3 and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Periodontology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences
    Rohtak, Haryana 124001, India
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06988839
Lead sponsor
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2025
Start date
Jun 26, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 12, 2026

Study contacts

Nishi Tanwar, MDS
Contact
nsh_tanwar@yahoo.co.in
8368126310
Kashish, BDS
Contact
kashish.21999@gmail.com
+919996944522

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion