ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06971692Updated May 14, 2025

Metacognitive Therapy vs Unified Protocol for Patients With Comorbid Anxiety Disorders

An interventional study of Metacognitive therapy (MCT) and Unified protocol (UP) in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-14.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of two transdiagnostic psychological treatments, Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) and the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP), for patients with complex anxiety.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent, impairing quality of life and contributing to substantial economic burden. A large portion of the affected individuals also fulfill the criteria for at least one other anxiety disorder and/or depression. This comorbidity is associated with increased symptom severity and a poorer prognosis. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective but traditionally relies on a specific manual for every distinct disorder, complicating the management of comorbidity and increasing training needs for therapists. Transdiagnostic therapies target underlying, shared mechanisms across anxiety disorders and depression, and can be used regardless of specific diagnoses. They thereby offer potential for efficient treatment of complex presentations, addressing a wider range of patients' problems with simplified therapist training.

Aims:

The primary aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of two transdiagnostic therapies, MCT and UP, for patients with comorbid anxiety. Beyond evaluating effectiveness, the project seeks to identify the key factors that drive improvement during treatment. Research questions:

  1. Are there differences in effect between MCT and UP regarding clinician-rated severity of anxiety and depression diagnoses after treatment?
  2. Are there differences in effect between MCT and UP regarding patients' self-reported symptoms of anxiety, depression, and functioning after treatment?
  3. Are there differences in effect between MCT and UP regarding clinician-rated severity of anxiety and depression diagnoses, as well as patients' self-reported symptoms of anxiety, depression, and functioning, at the 1-year follow-up after completed treatment?
  4. Does improvement occur in patients in the way that the treatment methods (MCT and UP, respectively) are intended to work, according to the presumptive mechanisms of change?

Methods:

  • Design and participants: Patients (N = 114) are randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to MCT or UP. Patients are consecutively recruited from the regular influx at two psychiatric clinicis in Stockholm, Sweden. See sections Study design and Eligibility.
  • Measurements: Most measures are rated at baseline, post-treatment and at the 1-year follow-up. For the purpose of mediational analyses, procsess measures as well as outcome measures of anxiety and depression are rated weekly during treatment. See section Outcome Measures.
  • Treatment conditions: Treatment (MCT or UP) is delivered in approximately 10-18 weekly face-to-face sessions. See section Arms and Interventions.
  • Data analyses: Analyses of treatment effects, including the primary outcome of pre- to post changes in Clinical Severity Rating (CSR) between conditions, are conducted according to the intention-to treat principle, using multilevel modeling. Model-based effect sizes, with 95% confidence intervals, are also calculated. For assessment of treatment response, disorder-specific measures are used with criteria for reliable change and clinical cut-off, rendering the categories recovered, improved, unchanged, or deteriorated. Remission status is also assessed according to blinded clinician-rated severity of anxiety and depression diagnoses after treatment, where CSR \< 4 means that a patient no longer fulfills criteria for a diagnosis. Differences in proportions are evaluated with chi-squared tests. Mediational analyses are conducted by disaggregating potential mediators to their within- and between-person components. To establish a temporal sequence between mediator and outcome, mediator scores are lagged relative to outcome.
02

Conditions studied

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
  • Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD)
  • Panic Disorder (With or Without Agoraphobia)
03

In context

Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

2,682 studies on the registry are indexed under Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; 601 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 114 is above the median of 69 across 2,196 interventional studies indexed under Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic.

Browse Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,148 studies on the registry; 276 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or above
  • Ability to read and speak Swedish
  • A principal diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, or panic disorder
  • At least one additional comorbid diagnosis (one of the above diagnoses, or obsessive-compulsive disorder, or major depressive disorder)
  • Patients on psychotropic medication must have been on a stable dose (excluding as-needed medication) for at least six weeks prior to treatment initiation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis of psychosis, bipolar disorder or moderate to severe substance use disorder
  • Medium to high suicide risk
  • Psychiatric, somatic or social problems that require primary intervention other than the treatments offered in the study
  • Concurrent psychological treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
114 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Metacognitive therapy (MCT)

    Transdiagnostic MCT, focused on modifying dysfunctional metacognitions and thereby reducing attentional and cognitive processes central to maintaining anxiety disorders.

    Behavioral: Metacognitive therapy (MCT)

  • Active comparator
    Unified protocol (UP)

    Transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy, focused on emotion regulation processes central to the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders, particularly neuroticism.

    Behavioral: Unified protocol (UP)

Interventions

  • BehavioralMetacognitive therapy (MCT)

    MCT is delivered in weekly face-to-face sessions

  • BehavioralUnified protocol (UP)

    UP is delivered in weekly face-to-face sessions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Severity Rating (CSR): change over time

    Diagnoses are assigned a dimensional clinical severity rating on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 8 (extremely severe symptoms), with a rating of 4 or higher representing the clinical threshold for diagnostic criteria. Observer-assessed.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1-year follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS): change over time

    Self-reported anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline, weekly during treatment (through up to 18 weeks/sessions) post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1-year follow-up

  2. Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS): change over time

    Self-reported depression

    Time frame: Baseline, weekly during treatment (through up to 18 weeks/sessions) post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1-year follow-up

  3. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7): change over time

    Self-reported anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1-year follow-up

  4. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): change over time

    Self-reported depression

    Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1-year follow-up

  5. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-5 (PCL-5): change over time

    Self-reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress. Only for patients with a principal diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1 year follow-up

  6. Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ): change over time

    Self-reported symptoms of generalized anxiety. Only for patients with a principal diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1 year follow-up

  7. Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Self-Report (LSAS-SR): change over time

    Self-reported symptoms of social anxiety. Only for patients with a principal diagnosis of Social Anxiety Disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1 year follow-up

  8. Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self-Rated (PDSS-SR): change over time

    Self-reported symptoms of panic. Only for patients with a principal diagnosis of Panic Disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1 year follow-up

  9. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-12): change over time

    Self-reported functional impairment

    Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions), 1-year follow-up

  10. Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-16 (DERS-16): change over time

    Self-reported difficulties in emotion regulation. Process measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, weekly during treatment (through up to 18 weeks/sessions) post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions)

  11. Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS-1): change over time

    Self-reported cognitive attentional syndrome and metacognitions. Process measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, weekly during treatment (through up to 18 weeks/sessions) post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions)

  12. Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) - subscale danger and uncontrollability: change over time

    Self-reported metacognitions. Process measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, weekly during treatment (through up to 18 weeks/sessions) post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions)

  13. Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ): after session 3

    Self-reported credibility of treatment and expectancy of improvement

    Time frame: After session 3 (between week 3 and 4)

  14. Facilitative Interpersonal Skills scale for Clients (FIS-C): after session 3

    Self-reported perspectives on therapist characteristics

    Time frame: After session 3 (between week 3 and 4)

  15. Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ): after treatment

    Self-reported adverse events

    Time frame: Post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions)

  16. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ): after treatment

    Self-reported satisfaction with treatment

    Time frame: Post-treatment (immediately after treatment completion of up to 18 weeks/sessions)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Psykiatri Nordväst and Psykiatri Sydväst, Region Stockholm
    Stockholm, Sweden
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2025; primary completion for Dec 2027, 28 months later.

Of 1,064 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 53. This study's planned 28 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,092 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 53.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 25, 2025
First posted
May 14, 2025
StartEst.
Aug 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
May 14, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06971692
Collaborators
Region Stockholm
Responsible party
Fredrik Santoft (Lic. psychologist, PhD, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 14, 2025
Start date
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 14, 2025

Study contacts

Fredrik A Santoft, PhD
Contact
fredrik.santoft@ki.se
+46707275474

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion