ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06970860DIDAPPHUpdated Oct 2, 2025

Detection of Bleeding Disorders Diagnosed After Vaginal Delivery Complicated by Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage

An observational study in Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage, sponsored by University Hospital, Brest. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-02.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Brest · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

A cohort study designed to detect bleeding disorders diagnosed in women who experienced severe postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery

Read the detailed description

Severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), defined as blood loss ≥ 1000 mL within 24 hours after delivery, is a common complication of childbirth (2% of deliveries in France and Europe). It is associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. Moreover, the incidence of PPH has been increasing in high-resource countries since the 1990s, making it a major public health issue.

Research conducted by our group on the Finistère cohort of pregnant women, highlighted that a first-degree family history of PPH is a risk factor for severe PPH after vaginal delivery, with an Odds Ratio of 2.37 (95% CI 1.56-3.60). These findings suggest a familial predisposition to PPH.

Furthermore, von Willebrand disease is the most common hereditary bleeding disorder worldwide, with an estimated prevalence between 0.6% and 1.3%. The most common form, type 1 von Willebrand disease, is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

There is limited data in the literature regarding the prevalence of bleeding disorders diagnosed following PPH in the general population. However, PPH is a frequent complication of childbirth in women with von Willebrand disease, with the prevalence of primary severe PPH being 2 to 4 times higher compared to the general population.

The research hypothesis of the DIDAPPH study is that severe PPH could be a presenting feature of previously undiagnosed von Willebrand disease.

If constitutional bleeding disorders were frequently diagnosed after severe PPH, then their systematic screening could be a public health priority for women of childbearing age and might enable more effective prevention of hemorrhagic complications during delivery, through prophylactic drug treatments, in subsequent pregnancies. Additionally, diagnosing von Willebrand disease in these women would have the added benefit of better preventing hemorrhagic complications after invasive procedures outside of pregnancy, particularly surgical ones, throughout their lifetime.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Postpartum hemorrhage
  • bleeding disorders
03

In context

Postpartum Hemorrhage

469 studies on the registry are indexed under Postpartum Hemorrhage; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is below the median of 169 across 96 observational studies indexed under Postpartum Hemorrhage.

Browse Postpartum Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Brest is the lead sponsor of 601 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The women included in the study will be adult women who experienced severe postpartum hemorrhage, defined as blood loss ≥1000 mL after a vaginal delivery. These women will be identified by the teams from the maternity units in Finistère.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women ≥ 18 years old
  • Who experienced severe postpartum hemorrhage, defined as blood loss ≥ 1000 mL, following a vaginal delivery in the previous 12 months, in a maternity unit in Finistère

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant at the time of inclusion
  • Women with a known hereditary bleeding disorder (Willebrand's disease, hemophilia carrier, etc.) or acute or chronic Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) prior to delivery.
  • Women with a known other bleeding pathology prior to delivery
  • Women taking a treatment that interferes with hemostasis, such as aspirin, anticoagulants or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (biological sampling may be postponed until after the interfering treatment has stopped, in the case of occasional use of the latter).
  • Women on long-term anticoagulant or antiaggregant therapy
  • Women under legal protection,
  • Women not affiliated to the French social security system.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort of women who experienced severe postpartum hemorrhage following a vaginal delivery.
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of biological test results suggestive of a bleeding disorder, correlated with the clinical bleeding phenotype, within the cohort

    Time frame: From inclusion to three month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of hereditary types of bleeding disorders diagnosed within the cohort based on the biological test results

    Time frame: From inclusion to three month

  2. Number of acquired types of bleeding disorders within the cohort based on the biological test results

    Time frame: From inclusion to three month

  3. Plasma levels of blood biomarkers associated with severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), as identified in another genetic study, among patients from the DIDAPPH cohort based on the biological test results

    Time frame: Inclusion

  4. Frequency of genetic polymorphisms associated with severe postpartum hemorrhage identified in another genetic study among patients from the DIDAPPH cohort based on the biological test results

    Time frame: Inclusion

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All collected data that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Data will be available after the publication of result and ending fifteen years following the last visit of the last patient

Access criteria: Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2025; primary completion for Sep 2029, 46 months later.

Of 38 non-industry observational studies under Postpartum Hemorrhage, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 46 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 42 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 6, 2025
First posted
May 14, 2025
StartEst.
Nov 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 15, 2029
CompletionEst.
Sep 15, 2029
Last update
Oct 2, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06970860
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2025
Start date
Nov 15, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 15, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 2, 2025

Study contacts

Claire DE MOREUIL
Contact
claire.demoreuil@chu-brest.fr
+330298145303

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion