ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05973344TADIG-PUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Understanding and Anticipating Therapeutic and ADverse Responses in Anti-cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Towards a Better Therapeutic Management of Patients

An observational study in Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital, Brest. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Brest · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to explore the value of blood biomarkers for the purpose of predicting irAE development in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inihibitors (ICI) alone or in combination with other treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy).

Data and blood samples will be collected from participants at different time points as part of routine follow-up visits. Data and blood samples will be analysed. Analysis will include the characterization of immune cells by mass and flow cytometry.

Read the detailed description

Advances in treating patients with immunotherapy have dramatically changed cancer morbidity and mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), alone or combined with other treatments, are currently used both as standard of care or in experimental settings for various cancers. ICI treatment induces objective clinical responses in 20-40% of patients (varies by tumor type); however, this leaves a majority of patients that do not respond to ICI therapy. ICI drugs purposely release immune regulatory controls and consequently increase immune activities; however, this release also provokes a significant risk of immunerelated adverse events (irAEs) such as dermatitis, hepatitis, thyroiditis and colitis, and less frequently but clinically important, hypophysitis, myocarditis and pneumonia. While the incidence of irAE is highly variable and influenced by many factors, Phase I and II trials reported rates from 10% to 80% for any grade irAE while an irAE of grade 3 or higher was observed in 2.5% to 18% of subjects. Recently, Jing et al. demonstrated that 20% of patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 had at least one irAE by integrating real-world pharmacovigilance of 26 tumor types for a total of 18,706 patients. Presently, the specific immune mechanism(s) driving irAE are unknown and biomarkers that predict their onset, particularly high-grade irAE, are urgently needed. For this reason, we hypothesize that an in-depth characterization and comparisons of the cell subpopulations composing and interacting within the primary cancer lesions, the peripheral blood, and in the organs in which irAE arise could help to better understand but also predict the clinical therapeutic response or/and irAE in patients with advanced cancers treated with ICI.

The research is a non-interventional monocentric prospective study of humans for the development of biological and medical knowledge, in which the procedures are performed and the products used in the usual manner, without additional or unusual diagnostic, treatment or monitoring procedures. The study includes patients monitored for their cancer at CHU of Brest and treated using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Data and peripheral blood (47mL) will be collected at different time points as part of routine follow-up visits for analysis. Analysis will include the characterization of immune cells by mass and flow cytometry.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • immunotherapy
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 200 across 2,638 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Brest is the lead sponsor of 601 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients with tumors treated with ICI (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1/PD-L1, LAG3, etc.) as standard-of-care, alone or in combination with other treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy)

Eligibility criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • performance status ≤ 1
  • Must have or cytologically confirmed tumour, eligible for treatment with ICI as standard-of-care alone or in combination with another ICI, ICI with chemotherapy, ICI with radiotherapy, or ICI with targeted therapy with no restrictions on number of prior systemic therapies
  • Adequate bone marrow function as defined below

    • ≥ 1500/µL or 1.5x109/L
    • ≥ 9 g/dL
    • ≥ 100000/µL or 100x109/L
  • Adequate liver function as defined below

    • Serum total ≤ 1.5 x . In case of known Gilbert's syndrome \< 3xUNL is allowed
    • (SGOT)/ALT (SGPT) ≤ 3.0 x ULN
    • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3.3 x ULN
  • Adequate renal function as defined below

    _- Creatinine ≤ 1.5 x UNL or > 60 mL/min

  • Patient monitored for their cancer at CHU of Brest
  • Did not oppose for their samples and clinical data to be used for translational research
  • Non-opposition form obtained prior to any study related procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a significant medical, neuro-psychiatric, or surgical condition, currently uncontrolled by treatment, which, in the principal investigator's opinion, may interfere with completion of the study
  • Patient already receiving ICI
  • Primary immunodeficiency and/or history of allogenic transplantation
  • Current active infection
  • Known (HIV), Virus (HBV), or Virus (HCV) infection (with the exception of chronic or cleared HBV and HCV infection)
  • Subject of guardianship (tutorship, curatorship)
  • Active pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of irAE over the duration of the patient's follow-up

    Apparition of irAE is appreciated according the physician definition. The description and grading scales of irAE found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 will be utilized for AE reporting. All appropriate treatment areas should have access to a copy of the CTCAE version 5.0. A copy of the CTCAE version 5.0 can be downloaded from the CTEP web site http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic\_applications/ctc.htm.

    Time frame: 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Survival (PFS).

    PFS is defined as the time from random assignment in the clinical trial to disease progression or death from any cause.

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. Survival (OS).

    OS is defined as the time from random assignment in the clinical trial to death.

    Time frame: 36 months

  3. Tumor response according to the iRECIST criteria

    A copy of the iRECIST can be downloaded from the Lancet Oncology web site: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(17)30074-8/fulltext

    Time frame: 36 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05973344
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 2, 2023
Start date
Feb 9, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 9, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 9, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Benjamin Auberger
Contact
benjamin.auberger@chu-brest.fr
+33298223740
Benjamin Auberger
principal investigator · CHU Brest

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion