ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06970093Updated Dec 8, 2025

Comparison of One Anastomisis Gastric Bypass and Duodeno-Jejunostomy for Treating SMA Syndrome

An interventional study of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Duodenojejunostomy in Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome, Duodenal Obstruction and Weight Loss, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-08.

Primary conditionGastrointestinal DiseasesRegistry: Weight LossReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Weight Loss — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Why
  1. Weight Loss is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Gastrointestinal Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2024, registered May 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out which surgery works better to treat people with a rare condition called Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome (SMAS). This condition causes the duodenum to be squeezed between two arteries, leading to severe nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. The researchers are comparing two types of surgery:

  • One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)
  • Duodeno-jejunostomy (DJ)

The main questions this study will answer are:

  • Which surgery improves symptoms and nutritional status better?
  • Which surgery leads to fewer complications and better quality of life?

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to one of the two surgeries
  • Be followed for 12 months after the operation
  • Complete follow-up visits and nutritional assessments
  • Answer questions about their symptoms and overall well-being
Read the detailed description

Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome (SMAS) is a rare but serious condition where part of the small intestine (the duodenum) gets compressed between major blood vessels. This can cause severe digestive symptoms and weight loss. Surgery is often needed when other treatments do not work.

This prospective randomized controlled trial compares two surgical options to relieve the compression: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Duodeno-jejunostomy (DJ). Both surgeries aim to improve food passage and relieve symptoms, but they work differently and have different effects on digestion and nutrition.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical procedures. The study will collect data before and after surgery on symptoms, nutritional status, complications, and quality of life. Follow-up will continue for 12 months.

The goal is to help surgeons and patients choose the most effective and safest surgical treatment for SMAS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome
  • Duodenal Obstruction
  • Weight Loss
  • Gastrointestinal Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome
  • SMAS
  • OAGB
  • One Anastomisis Gastric Bypass
  • Duodenojejunostomy
  • Gastrc Bypass
  • Intestinal Obstruction
  • Malnutrition
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Quality of Life
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Diseases Reclassified

548 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Diseases; 101 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 80 across 388 interventional studies indexed under Gastrointestinal Diseases.

Browse Gastrointestinal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University is the lead sponsor of 1,950 studies on the registry; 429 are open to participants now.

Of its 35 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Compared within Gastrointestinal Diseases, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Weight Loss. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome (SMAS) based on symptoms and radiologic findings
  • No prior gastric or intestinal surgery
  • Willingness and ability to participate in follow-up for 12 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of other gastrointestinal pathologies mimicking SMAS
  • Severe comorbidities contraindicating surgery (e.g., advanced cardiac or pulmonary disease)
  • History of previous bariatric or upper GI surgery
  • Refusal or inability to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OAGB Surgery Group

    Participants in this arm will undergo One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB). The procedure involves creating a long gastric pouch and connecting it to a loop of the jejunum. This reroutes food to bypass the compressed duodenum, aiming to relieve symptoms of Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome (SMAS) while preserving nutritional status.

    Procedure: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

  • Active comparator
    Duodenojejunostomy Group

    Participants in this arm will undergo Duodenojejunostomy (DJ), a surgical procedure in which a bypass connection is made between the duodenum and the jejunum. This relieves the duodenal compression caused by SMAS and restores normal food passage.

    Procedure: Duodenojejunostomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureOne Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

    Participants will undergo One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), a laparoscopic bariatric procedure that creates a long narrow gastric pouch and anastomoses it to a loop of jejunum approximately 150-200 cm from the ligament of Treitz. This bypasses the compressed duodenum to relieve symptoms of SMAS while promoting weight gain or nutritional restoration in undernourished patients.

    Also known as: Mini Gastric Bypass

  • ProcedureDuodenojejunostomy

    Participants will undergo Duodenojejunostomy (DJ), a standard surgical procedure to bypass the compressed segment of the duodenum. It involves creating an anastomosis between the duodenum and the jejunum distal to the point of compression, allowing normal food passage and relieving symptoms of Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome.

    Also known as: Duodenal Bypass

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in Postprandial Symptoms Scores

    Change in severity of postprandial symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, early satiety, abdominal pain), assessed using standardized scoring tools: the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Both scales range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no symptoms and 10 indicates the most severe symptoms imaginable. Higher scores reflect worse symptom severity. The Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) score used to assess nausea and vomiting improvement.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Change in BMI from baseline to 12 months postoperatively, used to assess nutritional recovery and weight regain after surgery.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ain Shams University Hospitals
    Cairo, Cairo Governorate 11566, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aleman R, Lo Menzo E, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.03. PubMed 32309411 ↗
  • Merrett ND, Wilson RB, Cosman P, Biankin AV. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: diagnosis and treatment strategies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Feb;13(2):287-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0695-4. Epub 2008 Sep 23. PubMed 18810558 ↗
  • Zaraket V, Deeb L. Wilkie's Syndrome or Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome: Fact or Fantasy? Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 5;9(2):194-9. doi: 10.1159/000431307. eCollection 2015 May-Aug. PubMed 26120301 ↗
  • Lee TH, Lee JS, Jo Y, Park KS, Cheon JH, Kim YS, Jang JY, Kang YW. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: where do we stand today? J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Dec;16(12):2203-11. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2049-5. Epub 2012 Oct 18. PubMed 23076975 ↗
  • Welsch T, Buchler MW, Kienle P. Recalling superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Dig Surg. 2007;24(3):149-56. doi: 10.1159/000102097. Epub 2007 Apr 27. PubMed 17476104 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) related to primary and secondary outcome measures will be available to researchers upon reasonable request after the study is published. Data sharing will be considered for academic and clinical research purposes.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Starting 3 months after publication of the primary results and for up to 3 years after publication

Access criteria: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents such as the study protocol and statistical analysis plan will be available to qualified researchers, academic institutions, or healthcare professionals. These individuals must submit a written request with a sound scientific rationale for secondary analysis. Access will be granted at the discretion of the principal investigator. Approved users must sign a data use agreement to ensure confidentiality and appropriate use. All requests should be sent to the principal investigator's official institutional email address.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2024 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 1 month.

Of 127 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Gastrointestinal Diseases, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 46. This study's 1 month is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 149 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 6, 2025
First posted
May 14, 2025
StartActual
Mar 5, 2024
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2024
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06970093
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2025
Start date
Mar 5, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2024
Completion
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 8, 2025

Study contacts

Mohey R Elbanna, MD
study director · Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion