ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06968546SUF-KET-PEDUpdated Jan 28, 2026

Sufentanil Versus Ketamine Intranasally in the Management of Severe Acute Trauma-related Pain in Children.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Intranasal Sufentanil and Intranasal Ketamine (IN) in Traumatology, Wounds and Injury and Fractures Bone, sponsored by Fondation Lenval. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.

Primary conditionFractures, BoneRegistry: Wounds and InjuriesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Wounds and Injuries — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Fractures, Bone
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Fractures, Bone, a narrower term within Wounds and Injuries.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Fondation Lenval · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
116
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pain is one of the most common reasons for children to attend emergency departments, particularly following traumatic injuries such as fractures, sprains, or contusions. Despite advances in medical care, severe acute pain in children is still sometimes inadequately treated. One important reason is that intravenous pain medication can be technically difficult, stressful, or delayed in paediatric patients.

Intranasal drug administration, which involves spraying medication into the nose, offers a rapid and needle-free way to relieve pain and is increasingly used in paediatric emergency care. Two medications can be administered through this route: ketamine and sufentanil. Intranasal ketamine is already widely used in children for pain management. Sufentanil is a potent opioid analgesic commonly used in adults and in anaesthesia but has been much less studied in children when administered intranasally.

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of intranasal sufentanil and intranasal ketamine in children aged 6 to 17 years who present to the emergency department with severe traumatic limb pain. Both medications will be given in addition to standard care, including the routine use of an oxygen-nitrous oxide gas mixture (MEOPA), which is commonly used to reduce pain and anxiety in children.

Children who take part in the study will be randomly assigned to receive either intranasal sufentanil or intranasal ketamine. Pain levels will be assessed at regular time points after medication administration using age-appropriate pain scales. Sedation level and possible side effects will also be closely monitored for a short period following treatment.

The hypothesis of this study is that intranasal sufentanil will provide greater pain relief than intranasal ketamine 30 minutes after administration, without increasing the risk of adverse effects, when both are used alongside standard emergency care.

The results of this study are expected to improve knowledge about fast, effective, and non-invasive pain relief strategies for children in emergency settings and may help optimise future pain management protocols in paediatric emergency care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatology
  • Wounds and Injury
  • Fractures Bone
  • Analgesia
  • Pain
  • Pain Management
  • Acute Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Fractures, Bone Reclassified

723 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 116 is above the median of 80 across 458 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondation Lenval is the lead sponsor of 61 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Compared within Fractures, Bone, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Wounds and Injuries. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 6 to 17 years inclusive, under 18 years old, weighing more than 10kg, and requiring analgesia for the management of acute pain
  • Presenting with pain assessed as severe using a validated pain scale (VAS > 6/10)
  • Acute traumatic lime injury
  • Pain caused by trauma, excluding thoracic trauma with dyspnea and abdominal pain
  • Obtaining written and signe from one of the two parents or legal guardians
  • Affiliation with a social security system
  • Hemodynamically stable
  • For post-menarche girls: negative urine pregnancy test and effective , in accordance with national regulations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient in a state of immediate life-threatening distress
  • Parents who don't understand and/or don't speak French
  • Known to opiods
  • Allergy to one of the study treatments
  • History of epilepsy or known psychiatric illness
  • History of respiratory, cardiac or renal insufficiency
  • Use of serotonergic antidepressants
  • Any child with an ongoing respiratory condition (asthma, laryngitis)
  • Thoracic trauma
  • Use of opioids within the 4 hours prior to arrival in the ermergency department
  • Any child with an ongoing respiratory condition (asthma, laryngitis)
  • Thoracic trauma
  • Use of opioids within the 4 hours prior to arrival in the ermergency department
  • History of head, abdominal, or spinal trauma
  • Confirmed pregnancy
  • History of toxic substance use
  • Facial or nasal trauma
  • Whithdrawal of from the parents or legal guardian
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
116 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    intranasal Ketamine

    Drug: Intranasal Ketamine (IN)

  • Experimental
    intranasal Sufentanil

    Drug: Intranasal Sufentanil

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in pain intensity from baseline to 30 minutes after intranasal administration

    Pain intensity will be measured using a validated 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) appropriate for children aged 6 years and older. The baseline pain score (T0) will be recorded immediately before intranasal administration of the study medication. .

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the administration of the treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to effective analgesia

    Time in minutes from intranasal drug administration to the first reduction of at least 20 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Pain is assessed every 5 minutes up to 30 minutes. Observations are censored if rescue analgesia is required.

    Time frame: every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes

  2. Excessive sedation

    Sedation assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale. Excessive sedation is defined as a Ramsay score greater than 3 at any time during follow-up.

    Time frame: every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes

  3. Child-reported satisfaction with pain management

    Child-reported satisfaction assessed using a smiley-face scale for children under 10 years and a validated PREM questionnaire for children aged 10 years and older.

    Time frame: at 60 minutes

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Occurrence of adverse events during follow-up, including respiratory depression, bradycardia, hypotension, and discomfort during intranasal administration.

    Time frame: every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes then every 10 minutes until 60 minutes after the study treatment administration.

  2. Parental satisfaction with pain management

    Parental satisfaction assessed at the end of follow-up using a three-option question: satisfied, not satisfied, or no opinion.

    Time frame: at 60 minutes

  3. Treatment tolerance: discomfort from intranasal instillation

    Monitoring for potential adverse events such as discomfort from intranasal instillation. For each adverse effect, the rate of patients experiencing at least one occurrence will be calculated, the severity will be graded, and the need for additional intervention will be documented.

    Time frame: every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes then every 10 minutes until 60 minutes after the study treatment administration.

  4. Treatment tolerance: Bradycardia

    Monitoring for potential adverse events such as bradycardia. For each adverse effect, the rate of patients experiencing at least one occurrence will be calculated, the severity will be graded, and the need for additional intervention will be documented.

    Time frame: every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes then every 10 minutes until 60 minutes after the study treatment administration.

  5. Treatment tolerance: Desaturation

    Monitoring for potential adverse events such as desaturation. For each adverse effect, the rate of patients experiencing at least one occurrence will be calculated, the severity will be graded, and the need for additional intervention will be documented.

    Time frame: every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes then every 10 minutes until 60 minutes after the study treatment administration.

  6. Treatment tolerance: Bradypnea

    3 - Monitoring for potential adverse events such as bradypnea. For each adverse effect, the rate of patients experiencing at least one occurrence will be calculated, the severity will be graded, and the need for additional intervention will be documented.

    Time frame: every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes then every 10 minutes until 60 minutes after the study treatment administration.

  7. Treatment tolerance: sedation

    Monitoring for potential adverse events such as sedation. For each adverse effect, the rate of patients experiencing at least one occurrence will be calculated, the severity will be graded, and the need for additional intervention will be documented.

    Time frame: every 5 minutes for the first 30 minutes then every 10 minutes until 60 minutes after the study treatment administration.

  8. Assessment of supplemental analgesic consumption: Before Time 0

    Consumption of additional analgesics will be assessed as binary parameters (yes/no).

    Time frame: Time 0

  9. Assessment of supplemental analgesic consumption: After Time 0

    Consumption of additional analgesics will be assessed as binary parameters (yes/no).

    Time frame: 60 minutes

  10. Assessment of supplemental analgesic consumption: Category

    3 catergories will be classified: * Level I (e.g., paracetamol, ibuprofen) * Level II (e.g., profenid) * MEOPA (equimolar mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide)

    Time frame: 60 minutes

  11. Assessment of supplemental analgesic consumption: Administrative reason

    The reasons for administering additional analgesics (e.g., persistent pain, child's request, clinical assessment, immobilization) will be documented.

    Time frame: 60 minutes

  12. Deadline of supplemental analgesic consumption

    The time to administration of additional analgesic, defined as the time in minutes between administration of the primary treatment (T0) and the first dose of additional analgesic, will be collected and analyzed.

    Time frame: 60 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mendes Dos Reis C, Olla M, Freyssinet E, Baranton E, Joulie A, Fontas E, Tran A. Intranasal sufentanil versus ketamine for acute severe traumatic pain in children: protocol for a phase II randomised controlled trial (SUF-KET-PED). BMJ Open. 2026 May 20;16(5):e112617. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112617. PubMed 42161544 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Feb 2026; primary completion for Mar 2028, 25 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 24, 2025
First posted
May 13, 2025
StartEst.
Feb 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2028
Last update
Jan 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06968546
Lead sponsor
Fondation Lenval
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 13, 2025
Start date
Feb 5, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 28, 2026

Study contacts

Aline JOULIE, PHD
Contact
joulie.a@chu-nice.fr
+33492030520
MARCO OLLA, MD
principal investigator · Fondation Lenval Hôpitaux pediatrique Nice chu Lenval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sufentanil

Start the discussion