ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07578038GIpedUpdated May 11, 2026

Interest of Urinary Measurement of Immunogenic Gluten Peptides (GIP) in the Follow-up of Pediatric Celiac Patients.

An interventional study of Urinary measurement of GIP and Usual follow-up and measurement of urinary GIP. in Coeliac Disease, sponsored by Fondation Lenval. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-11.

Sponsored by Fondation Lenval · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main reason for insufficient control of celiac disease is non-adherence to the gluten-free diet (GFD), whether voluntary or involuntary. In children, involuntary exposures are common (canteens, snacks, restaurants). There are no evidence-based recommendations regarding the best way to follow up with patients and assess adherence to the diet. Monitoring of celiac disease is traditionally based on IgA anti-transglutaminase (IgA anti-tTG) serology, but it reflects a delayed immune response and does not detect occasional exposures. Numerous studies conducted outside of France seem to highlight the usefulness of measuring gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP), compared to the current tools used. Measuring GIP in urine, which is non-invasive and can be performed regularly, could allow for earlier and more objective detection of recent gluten exposure, particularly inadvertent exposure, even before symptoms appear. Furthermore, it could serve as a complementary test for patients who continue to show symptoms or positive serology despite a reported well-followed GFD. In such situations, the use of control esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with jejunal biopsies could be reconsidered in the event of positive urinary GIP. This is the first study conducted in France on the usefulness of urinary measurement of immunogenic gluten peptides in the follow-up of pediatric celiac patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coeliac Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pediatrics
03

In context

Celiac Disease

352 studies on the registry are indexed under Celiac Disease; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 50 across 214 interventional studies indexed under Celiac Disease.

Browse Celiac Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondation Lenval is the lead sponsor of 61 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 2 to 18 years.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of celiac disease according to ESPGHAN criteria.
  • Gluten-free diet followed for ≥ 6 months.
  • Signed by one of the 2 parents or the legal guardian and oral or written assent from the child.
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Predictable compliance problem in the study
  • Non-French-speaking patient
  • Seronegative celiac disease at diagnosis
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Patient protected by law, that is, subject to protective measures (judicial safeguard, guardianship, trusteeship, procedures for opening guardianship and trusteeship measures)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GIP Group

    The test used is the iVYCHECK GIP urine® test, a rapid immunochromatographic test used to detect immunogenic gluten peptides (GIP) in urine. In the experimental group, urinary GIP levels are measured at M0, M6, and M12 with two urine samples collected at home at M6 and two urine samples collected at home at M12 in addition to the sample collected during the consultation.

    Diagnostic Test: Urinary measurement of GIP

  • Active comparator
    control group

    The test used is the iVYCHECK GIP urine® test, a rapid immunochromatographic test used to detect immunogenic gluten peptides (GIP) in urine. In the control group, standard follow-up at M0, M6. At M12, two urine samples collected at home in addition to the sample collected during the consultation.

    Diagnostic Test: Usual follow-up and measurement of urinary GIP.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testUrinary measurement of GIP

    The test used is the iVYCHECK GIP urine® test, a rapid immunochromatographic test used to detect immunogenic gluten peptides (GIP) in urine. In the experimental group, urinary GIP levels are measured at M0, M6, and M12 with two urine samples collected at home at M6 and two urine samples collected at home at M12 in addition to the sample collected during the consultation.

    Also known as: at M0, at M6, at M12.

  • Diagnostic testUsual follow-up and measurement of urinary GIP.

    The test used is the iVYCHECK GIP urine® test, a rapid immunochromatographic test used to detect immunogenic gluten peptides (GIP) in urine. In the control group, standard follow-up at M0, M6. At M12, two urine samples collected at home in addition to the sample collected during the consultation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare the 1-year effectiveness of a clinical follow-up strategy based on urinary GIP measurement versus standard care, in patients with celiac disease in the pediatric population.

    The effectiveness of care guided by urinary GIP testing, combined with reinforced dietary assessment by a dietitian, will be evaluated at Month 12 using urinary GIP measurements. A positive GIP result is defined as evidence of recent gluten ingestion. The test provides an immediate binary outcome (positive or negative). At each assessment time point, patients will be classified as GIP-positive if at least one of the three urine tests performed is positive. At baseline (M0), where only a single test is conducted, GIP status will be determined based on that result alone.

    Time frame: 12 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation between urinary GIP concentration and presence of gastrointestinal symptoms

    Assessment of the correlation between urinary glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) results, measured using the iVYCHECK GIP Urine Test (reported as positive or negative), and the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms. Symptoms are defined as the presence of at least one of the following: abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, abdominal distension, or weight loss. Symptom presence will be recorded as a binary outcome (yes/no).

    Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6, and Month 12 in the experimental group; Month 12 in the control group.

  2. Correlation between urinary GIP test results and pediatrician assessment of gluten intake

    Assessment of the correlation between urinary glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) results, measured using the iVYCHECK GIP Urine Test (reported as positive or negative), and the assessment of gluten intake performed by a pediatrician. Gluten intake will be evaluated using a standardized clinical assessment based on parental interview and dietary review, and recorded as a binary outcome (gluten intake: yes/no). This assessment includes: voluntary consumption of gluten-containing foods, verification of product labels for gluten content, and evaluation of food choices during meals outside the home.

    Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6, and Month 12 in the experimental group; Month 12 in the control group.

  3. Correlation between urinary GIP test results and anti-transglutaminase antibody serology

    Assessment of the correlation between urinary glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) results, measured using the iVYCHECK GIP Urine Test (reported as positive or negative), and anti-transglutaminase antibody levels measured in serum using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), expressed in international units per milliliter (IU/mL). Serology results will be analyzed both as a continuous variable (IU/mL) and as a categorical variable defined as negative (\< 7 IU/mL) or positive (≥ 7 IU/mL), according to standard laboratory thresholds. Serological assessments will be performed according to routine clinical care at Month 0 (baseline), Month 6, and/or Month 12, as prescribed by the treating physician, in both the experimental and control groups.

    Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6, and Month 12 in the experimental group; Month 12 in the control group.

  4. Assess the satisfaction of patients and parents regarding the integration of the GIP into the therapeutic follow-up strategy for adherence to the RSG

    Parental/child satisfaction will be assessed using a Likert scale responding to the following question: 'Does urinary GIP measurement during follow-up reassure you about proper adherence to the gluten-free diet?' This question will be asked to patients over 13 years old or to parents if the child is under 13 years old, with 5 possible response levels, from strongly agree to strongly disagree.

    Time frame: Month 12

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Jun 2029, 36 months later.

Of 82 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Celiac Disease, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 87 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 27, 2026
First posted
May 11, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2029
CompletionEst.
Jun 2029
Last update
May 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07578038
Lead sponsor
Fondation Lenval
Responsible party
Aline JOULIE (Clinical trial manager, Fondation Lenval) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 11, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 11, 2026

Study contacts

Aline JOULIE, PHD
Contact
joulie.a@chu-nice.fr
+33.4.92.03.05.20
Valérie Dr Triolo, MD
Contact
valerie.triolo@hpu.lenval.com
Valérie Dr Triolo, MD
principal investigator · Fondation Lenval Hôpitaux pediatrique Nice chu Lenval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion