An interventional study of AI-ECG guided diagnosis in Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left and Artificial Intelligence, sponsored by National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-21.
Sponsored by National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening
Asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ALVSD), identified as a key component of stage B heart failure (HF) by AHA/ACC guidelines, is a common precursor to clinically overt HF. This progressive chronic disease affects over 23 million people worldwide and leads to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Although ALVSD presents a relatively lower risk compared to symptomatic reduced ejection fraction HF, it remains associated with a 1.6-fold increase in the risk of incident HF, a 2.13-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality, and a 1.46-fold increase in all-cause mortality. The prevalence of ALVSD ranges from 3% to 6%, at least twice that of symptomatic HF. To prevent progression to symptomatic heart failure and associated morbidities and mortalities, guideline-directed medical therapy, including ACEIs/ARBs or beta-blockers, is essential for patients with ALVSD. However, distinguishing individuals with ALVSD from the general population is challenging due to the lack of symptoms. Effective screening methods are crucial to identify individuals with ALVSD. Traditionally, diagnosing ALVSD involves screening asymptomatic populations using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which is costly, time-consuming, and inconvenient for patients. Other screening methods, such as laboratory tests for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N- terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), have insufficient diagnostic performance.
Previous research proposed an AI-based alarm system (AI-S) to screen patients for ALVSD, demonstrating greater accuracy than BNP screening and improved accessibility compared to widespread echocardiography. AI-S demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.6% (standard error [SE] 0.042) for detecting medium-risk ALVSD patients and 63% (SE 0.154) for high-risk ALVSD patients, with a specificity of 92.7% (SE 0.003) for medium-risk patients and 98.7% (SE 0.002) for high-risk patients. AI-S is accuracy, noninvasive, highly accessible in local medical clinics, less time-consuming, and cost-effective, making it a valuable screening tool for identifying ALVSD prior to echocardiography or other confirmatory diagnostic methods.
To date, no randomized controlled trial has assessed the cost-effectiveness and impact of AI-assisted screening tools for heart failure prevention in Asians. The ECG AI-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction (EAGLE) trial reported a 32% increase in diagnosing of low left ventricular ejection fraction (defined as LVEF ≤50%) within 90 days of the ECG. However, this population was not Asian, and randomization involved primary care teams rather than participants. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the impact of AI-S on diagnosing low ejection fraction in Asians, its cost-effectiveness, and the incidence of worsening HF (defined as admission for HF or HF-related emergency department visits).
6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 13,350 is above the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.
Browse Heart Failure studies →National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.
ECG (electrocardiogram)
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)
The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants undergo screening using the AI-ECG system. Participants identified as medium- to high-risk for LV dysfunction (LVEF \<50%) are recommended for echocardiography to confirm the diagnosis and guide subsequent management.
Diagnostic Test: AI-ECG guided diagnosis
Participants undergo screening using the AI-ECG system, but diagnosis and management follow usual clinical practice without immediate echocardiography based on AI-ECG results.
Participants undergo screening using the AI-ECG system. Participants identified as medium- to high-risk for LV dysfunction (LVEF \<50%) are recommended for echocardiography to confirm the diagnosis and guide subsequent management.
Detection of mildly reduced or severely reduced LV function
The endpoint measures the proportion of participants with mildly reduced (LVEF 40-49%) or severely reduced (LVEF \<40%) LV function detected by echocardiography.
Time frame: Within 90 days after randomization
Severe reduced LVEF
The endpoint measures the proportion of participants with severely reduced LV function (LVEF \<40%) identified by echocardiography.
Time frame: Within 90 days after randomization
Heart failure events
The endpoint measures the composite number of heart failure emergency department visits and heart failure admissions.
Time frame: Within 90 days after randomization
Receiving echocardiography exam
The endpoint measures the proportion of participants who receive echocardiography examination.
Time frame: Within 90 days after randomization
Started Jun 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 36 months after the start.
Of 1,118 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 36 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 1,354 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan