ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06945848DIVEIINLATEUpdated Mar 6, 2026

Venous Stenting Evaluation in Patients With Intracranial Hypertension Under Long-term Acetazolamide

An interventional study of Acetazolamide and Stent (Tentos 4F or Precise ProRX) in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH), sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier. Recruiting at 3 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-06.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is aimed at patients suffering from long term intracranial hypertension (caracterized by visual loss, chronic headache and/or tinnitus), receiving acetazolamide for more than 1 year, having inadequate response to treatment (untolerable side effects or insufficient efficacy).

The goal is to evaluate if stenting of a specific vein in the brain could decrease the hypertension and improve associated symptoms. Patients will be randomly assigned in either best medical care group (recommended medication associated with weight loss) or interventional group (best medical care + stenting of the specific vein) and will undergo specific follow-up visits after 1, 3 and 12 months.

Read the detailed description

The DIVE-IIN-LATE trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether transverse sinus stenting is more effective than best medical therapy alone for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) treated with acetazolamide for more than one year. The study targets patients diagnosed with IIH with bilateral transverse sinus stenosis or unilateral stenosis of the dominant transverse sinus with a hypoplastic contralateral sinus.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is, in most cases, associated with narrowing of the transverse sinus vein, which may be the cause of increased intracranial blood pressure, resulting in the accumulation and increase in intracranial fluid pressure. This increased pressure is thought to be responsible for papilledema, chronic headaches, and tinnitus, among other symptoms.

Restoring a normal luminal diameter of the transverse sinus using a stent could therefore allow for the rapid restoration of normal intracranial pressures and an improvement in various symptoms.

Stent implantation in the transverse sinus is now part of standard care, but no large-scale clinical trial has formally established the superiority of the technique compared to the standard of care (drug therapy combined with weight loss). This study aims to provide evidence on the potential benefits of transverse venous sinus stenting as a treatment option for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which could significantly change the current management approach of this disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH)

Keywords

  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Papillary edema
  • Stenting
  • Transverse sinus vein
  • Chronic headache
  • Tinnitus
03

In context

Pseudotumor Cerebri

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Pseudotumor Cerebri; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 114 is above the median of 60 across 35 interventional studies indexed under Pseudotumor Cerebri.

Browse Pseudotumor Cerebri studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier is the lead sponsor of 1,261 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject is ≥ 18 years old at inclusion.
  2. Subject with definite diagnosis of IIH satisfying the modified Dandy criteria (A to E) ) at the time of initial diagnosis, under BMM including ACZ for more than 1 year
  3. Patient with elevated intracranial pressure defined as > 25 cm H20 or 18 mmHg
  4. Subject with intracranial TVS stenosis on dominant transverse sinus and hypoplastic contralateral one (or bilateral TVS stenosis) diagnosed on MRI
  5. Normal MRI findings excepted intracranial TVS stenosis or IIH related abnormalities
  6. Patient having received information about data collection and having signed and dated an Form
  7. Subjects must be able to attend all scheduled visits and to comply with all trial procedures
  8. Subjects must be covered by public health insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients receiving topiramate in the previous month
  2. Known contrast product, Nickel, titanium allergy
  3. Exposure to an oral drug (other than ACZ), substance, or disorder that has been associated with elevation of intracranial pressure within 2 months of diagnosis (lithium, vitamin A, tetracycline and related compounds)
  4. History of intracranial venous thrombosis or intracranial neoplasia
  5. Fulminant decrease of visual acuity due to the IIH defined as a visual loss (of the most seriously impaired eye) of at least 3/10 (from corrected vision) within 4 weeks, in absence of any other ophthalmologic pathology and Mean Deficit of visual field superior to -10 dB
  6. Optic nerve atrophy
  7. Amblyopia
  8. Refractive error greater ±8 sphere or more than ±3 in cylinder in either eye if there are abnormalities in funduscopy (optic disc tilt, staphyloma), previous glaucoma, other disorders causing visual loss
  9. Pregnancy: if a woman is of a urine or serum beta HCG test is positive
  10. Patient with a severe or fatal comorbidity that will likely prevent improvement or follow-up or that will render the procedure unlikely to benefit the patient.
  11. Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage (subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), etc.)
  12. under 6 months
  13. Patients with renal failure (creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl and/or \< 60 mL/min, except if patient is already on hemodialysis)
  14. History of previously implanted intra-cranial sinus stent
  15. Previous gastric bypass surgery AAP-DGOS PHRC-N 22_0175 CHU DE MONTPELLIER Pr Costalat Vincent/Pr Ducros Anne Version n°2.2 date 25/03/2025 Page 28 sur 63
  16. to general anesthesia
  17. Contra-indication to aspirin, clopidogrel or other P2Y12 anti-aggregant
  18. History of or other severe respiratory disease
  19. History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
  20. History of atrial fibrillation or other risks of stroke
  21. Cerebral vascular lesions (arteriovenous malformation, arteriovenous fistula, aneurysms, significant stenosis of extra- or intra-cranial vessels other than the targeted venous sinus stenosis, intracranial artery dissection, etc.).
  22. Anatomical anomaly of the venous sinus which would prevent safe catheterization and stenting
  23. Subject who are in a dependency or employment with the sponsor or the investigator
  24. Participation in another clinical trial or administration of an unapproved drug within the last 4 weeks before the screening date
  25. Subject protected according to the French Public Health Code (e.g. patients under law protection, prisoners, pregnant, parturient or lactating women, and patients under guardianship/curatorship)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
114 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Acetazolamide

    Acetazolamide and recommended weight loss

    Drug: Acetazolamide

  • Experimental
    Experimental (stenting, neuro-radiological intervention)

    Stenting of the transverse sinus vein

    Device: Stent (Tentos 4F or Precise ProRX)

Interventions

  • Acetazolamide will be maintained and weight loss will be recommended

    Also known as: Weight loss

  • DeviceStent (Tentos 4F or Precise ProRX)

    Transverse venous sinus will be stented by neuroradiological intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of patients with normalization of intra-cranial pressure

    Rate of patients with normalization of intra-cranial pressure (defined as ≤ 25 cm H20 or 18 mmHg)

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Discontinuation of Acetazolamide

    Percentage of patients discontinuing ACZ in the stenting group without papillary edema recurrence

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Discontinuation of Acetazolamide

    Percentage of patients discontinuing ACZ in the stenting group without papillary edema recurrence

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Headache

    Change in mean HIT-6 grading scale score (patient's questionnaire containing 6 questions to evaluate the severity of headache)

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  4. Monthly headache days

    Change in monthly headache days (within the last month) reported on patients' dairy

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  5. Tinnitus

    Change in THI (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory) score

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  6. Visual field

    Change in decibel of Mean Deficit visual field assessed on automated perimetry in both eyes with Humphrey Field Analyzer SITA Standard 24-2 test pattern. Each participant will have at least 2 initial visual field examinations conducted at least 30 minutes apart. The 2 Perimetric Mean Deviation (PMD) measurements will be averaged.

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  7. Visual acuity

    Change of visual acuity score evaluated on ETDRS (far vision) at 4 meters and reproducible lighting using the best optical correction

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  8. Visual acuity

    Change of visual acuity score evaluated on Parinaud scale (near vision) using the best optical correction

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  9. Papilledema

    Change of papilledema assessed on Frisen score on OCT

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  10. Papilledema

    Change of papilledema assessed on RNFL on OCT

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  11. Patient's autonomy

    Change in quality of life assessed on EQ5D questionnaire

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  12. Patient's cognition

    Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  13. Cognition

    Change in Trail Making Test (TMT)

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2029, 36 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 3, 2025
First posted
Apr 25, 2025
StartActual
Jan 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 5, 2029
CompletionEst.
Jan 5, 2030
Last update
Mar 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06945848
Collaborators
Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 25, 2025
Start date
Jan 5, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 5, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 5, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 6, 2026

Study contacts

Vincent COSTALAT, MD, PhD
Contact
v-costalat@chu-montpellier.fr
+33 467 337 532
Fédérico CAGNAZZO, MD, PhD
Contact
f-cagnazzo@chu-montpellier.fr
+33 467 337 532
Vincent COSTALAT, MD, PhD
study director · University hospital of Montpellier, FRANCE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion