CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06928220CIMMISUpdated Apr 15, 2025

The Impact of Manual Versus Mechanical Intestinal Suturing on the Incidence of Postoperative Complications Following Cystectomy With Ileal Conduit

An interventional study of cystectomy with ileal conduit, using mechanical bowel anastomosis and cystectomy with ileal conduit, using manual bowel anastomosis in Bladder Cancer, Anastomosis; Complications and Ileus Paralytic, sponsored by Fundacio Puigvert. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-15.

Sponsored by Fundacio Puigvert · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Impact of Manual Versus Mechanical Intestinal Suturing on the Incidence and Management of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Conduit.

Read the detailed description

Currently, no specific trial compares hand-sewn intestinal anastomosis with mechanical stapled anastomosis in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal conduit.

At Fundació Puigvert, approximately one hundred radical cystectomies with ileal conduit are performed annually. Due to the lack of evidence regarding the superiority of either intestinal anastomosis technique, the decision to use hand-sewn versus stapled anastomosis depends on the surgeon's expertise, without considering the potential impact of each technique on postoperative complication rates, surgical time, or functional outcomes.

Currently, no well-designed surgical trials demonstrate differences between hand-sewn and mechanical stapled anastomosis in radical cystectomy regarding intraoperative and postoperative complications. For this reason, the investigators will conduct a trial to assess the impact of each anastomosis technique

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Anastomosis; Complications
  • Ileus Paralytic

Keywords

  • bladder Cancer
  • Cystectomy
  • hand sewn anastamosis
  • stapled anastamosis
  • intestinal complications
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

1,616 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 421 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 60 across 1,163 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundacio Puigvert is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient who consents to participate and signs the informed consent.
  • Patient candidate for radical open cystectomy and ileal conduit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who is unable to complete the study questionnaires.
  • Patient who has a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  • Candidate patients for other urinary diversions other than ileal conduit as a first option
  • Candidate patients for laparoscopic or robotic cystectomy..
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Manual anastamosis

    Intestinal anastamosis will be performed manually

    Procedure: cystectomy with ileal conduit, using manual bowel anastomosis

  • Active comparator
    Mechanical anastamosis

    Intestinal anastamosis will be performed using stapling device

    Procedure: cystectomy with ileal conduit, using mechanical bowel anastomosis

Interventions

  • Procedurecystectomy with ileal conduit, using mechanical bowel anastomosis

    An ileal conduit will be the new storage area for urine once the bladder is removed. GIA Device will be used to perform bowel anastomosis

  • Procedurecystectomy with ileal conduit, using manual bowel anastomosis

    An ileal conduit will be the new storage area for urine once the bladder is removed. Vycryl suture will be used to perform manual bowel anastomosis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Demonstrate the superiority of manual intestinal suturing versus mechanical suturing, defined as a lower incidence of postoperative digestive complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal conduit.

    Compare the incidence of gastrointestinal complications according to the type of suturing used in the creation of the ileo-ileal anastomosis in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal conduit during the hospital admission period and at one-year follow-up.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the predictive factors of postoperative complications.

    Identify the predictive factors of postoperative complications during hospital admission and at one-year follow-up, both overall and according to the type of suturing.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fundacio Puigvert
    Barcelona, 08025, Spain
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06928220
Lead sponsor
Fundacio Puigvert
Responsible party
Pavel Gavrilov (Consultant surgeon, Fundacio Puigvert) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 15, 2025
Start date
Oct 19, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 4, 2025
Completion
Apr 7, 2025
Last update
Apr 15, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion