ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06925490Updated Apr 27, 2025

Comparison of 3Mixtatin Pulpotomy and Metapex Pulpectomy in Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis

A Phase 1 interventional study of Metapex and 3Mixtatin in Irreversible Pulpitis, Primary Teeth and Pulp Disease, Dental, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 9 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-27.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 14 studies in Dental Pulp Diseases by Cairo University — 8 open to participants now, 8 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Dental Pulp Diseases · Cairo University.

Planned enrollment
2nd of 13
50 · median 50
Started
2025
with 3 others
Phase 1
3 of 14
3 open now
Registered
13th of 14
by date

Among the 14 studies in Dental Pulp Diseases by Cairo University, this one is the 2nd largest by planned enrollment of the 13 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2025, is one of 3 in phase 1, and was the 13th registered.

Dental Pulp Diseases

130 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Pulp Diseases; 37 are open to participants now.

Browse Dental Pulp Diseases studies →

Open to participants now

8 of the 14 studies in Dental Pulp Diseases by Cairo University are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 8 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 16 Dental Pulp Diseases studies recruiting now, 5 (31%) set no upper age limit and 10 (63%) stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; 12 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 4 Years to 9 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 14 studies in Dental Pulp Diseases by Cairo University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The present study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy using 3Mixtatin versus pulpectomy using Metapex in primary molars with irreversible pulpitis in children aged 4 to 9 years.

Read the detailed description

Primary teeth play an essential role in esthetics, phonatics, and mastication, that's why they should be preserved as the best space maintainers until their proper exfoliation time. Various pulp therapies were suggested based on the extent of carries, including vital pulp therapy (direct pulp capping, pulpotomy) and non-vital pulp therapy (pulpectomy). Current guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry (BSPD) recommend pulpectomy as the gold standard treatment for vital primary molars diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. Pulpectomy is a non-vital treatment procedure where the entire pulp tissue is extirpated and the root canals debrided and shaped to receive a resorbable material to fill the canal space in the affected primary tooth.

In recent years, a paradigm shift has emerged towards performing pulpotomy, a more conservative approach that involves partial removal of the pulp tissue, furthermore, a previous histological study of teeth with irreversible pulpitis showed that inflammation and microbial invasion are confined to the coronal pulp, sparing the radicular pulp. This finding concurred that pulpotomy could represent a viable treatment option for teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis, as it preserves tooth structure, enhances healing potential in the remaining pulp promoting long-term clinical and radiographic success.

Recently, the concept of a newer economical material "3Mixtatin" has come into research and has been studied for its use in direct pulp capping, inflammatory root resorption, and pulpotomy in primary teeth. The material is a combination of 3Mix (cefixime, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacin) and a statin (Simvastatin).

3Mixtatin, incorporates Simvastatin, an antihyperlipidemic drug, into the triple antibiotic paste, Simvastatin was used as an anti inflammatory and bioinductive agent, whereas 3Mix served as an antibacterial agent.

Statin components are emerging materials in regenerative dentistry. Evidence from both experimental and clinical studies supports the notion of 'pleiotropic' effects of statins, they improve osteoblasts function and suppress function of osteoclast leading to enhanced bone formation. Therefore, they might improve odontoblastic function resulting in improved dentin formation. Statins are also thought to induce angiogenesis and increase neuronal cell. Consequently, they play a role in pulp regeneration along with dentin regeneration. In addition, sufficient evidence exists in support of the potent anti-inflammatory properties of statins, they reduce circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) and pro-inflammatory cytokines, lowering the amount of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in inflamed pulpal tissues.

Owing to limited availability of data in researches and in order to reach conclusive results on whether pulpotomy can be offered as an alternate treatment to pulpectomy in vital primary molars diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis, our study aims to evaluate clinical and radiographic success of of pulpotomy using 3Mixtatin versus pulpectomy using Metapex with vital primary molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in children aged 4 to 9 years.

03

Conditions studied

  • Irreversible Pulpitis
  • Primary Teeth
  • Pulp Disease, Dental

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • 3Mixtatin
  • irreversible pulpitis
  • metapex
  • pulpectomy
  • pulpotomy
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged from 4 to 9 years with vital primary molars showing signs of irreversible pulpitis.
  • Children with spontaneous pain lasting a few seconds to several hours.
  • Pain is intensified by thermal stimulus and persists after its removal.
  • Pulp hemorrhage after performing access cavity and deroofing of pulp chamber showing reddish pink healthy pulp tissue.
  • Radicular pulp health is verified by achieving hemostasis within eight minutes of compression using a cotton pellet with 5% sodium hypochlorite.
  • Absence of peri-apical or inter-radicular radiolucency, widening of periodontal ligament space, internal or external root resorption.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unrestorable primary molars.
  • Primary molars with uncontrolled pulp hemorrhage or pulp necrosis.
  • Medically compromised patients who have systemic disease.
  • Uncooperative children who refuse treatment.
  • Children whose parents are unwilling to place stainless steel crowns.
  • Children whose parents or caregivers refuse to participate in the study or are unable to attend follow-up visits.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    metapex pulpectomy

    Single-visit pulpectomy using Metapex, . Calcium hydroxide-iodoform mixture (Metapex) is an ideal pulpal filling material for primary teeth.

    Drug: Metapex

  • Experimental
    3Mixtatin Pulpotomy

    pulpotomy with 3 mixtatin (triple antibiotic paste of (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin mixed with simvastatin ) applied in the vital pulp therapy

    Drug: 3Mixtatin

Interventions

  • DrugMetapex

    Pulpectomy using Metapex

  • Drug3Mixtatin

    pulpotomy treatment when applying 3mixture of antibiotic (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin) along with simvastatin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical success

    * Pain to percussion will be assessed by applying a light-tapping force to the relevant tooth using the blunt end of the dental probe. Tapping will be applied as gently as possible from a 1 cm distance, either present or absent. * Swelling will be assessed through clinical examination, either present or absent. * The sinus tract or fistula will be assessed through clinical examination, either present or absent. * The mobility of teeth will be assessed by applying pressure to the ends of two metal instruments, either present or absent. * The principal investigator and the co-supervisor will undertake this clinical assessment on every recall visit during the 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up period.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiographic Success

    * Radiolucency at the furcation or periapical area, internal or external root resorption, will be examined (present or not) through digital periapical radiographs. * The radiographic assessments will be performed as baseline data at the first visit following the procedure completion and at 6 and 12 months after the baseline * The Two blind assessors will independently evaluate the radiographic outcomes.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  2. Post operative pain

    After the completion of treatment, post-operative pain will be assessed using the Visual analog scale. This scale comprises six faces, with numbers ranging from 0 to 10 and word descriptions. During follow-up visits, the patients are asked to point to the face that best represents their feelings.

    Time frame: 1 week, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2025; primary completion for Sep 2026, 15 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 6, 2025
First posted
Apr 13, 2025
StartEst.
Jun 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 2026
Last update
Apr 27, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06925490
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Nora Mohamed Mosaad Hussien (Pedodontist, Cairo University, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2025
Start date
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2025

Study contacts

Nora Mohamed Mosaad, PHD researcher
Contact
nora.mosaad@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
00201000921189
Marwa Aly Fouad, Associate Professor
Contact
marwaaly2003@yahoo.com
Osama Ibrahim El Shahawy, Professor
study director · Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Marwa Aly Fouad, Associate professor
study chair · Associate Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion