An interventional study of Life Story Club in Apathy, Loneliness and Reminiscence Therapy, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.
Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Reminiscence therapy is a non-invasive, non-pharmacological intervention that has been shown to improve cognition, mood, functional status, quality of life, and apathy in older adults. Group reminiscence therapy combines structured social engagement and recounting of personal stories that address both social connection (a risk factor for cognitive decline) and cognition. Life story club© (LSC) is an established, non-profit organization that provides virtual, group reminiscence therapy for older adults to reduce loneliness and promote a sense of belonging and has not been formally studied.
The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of a LSC© intervention to improve loneliness and apathy in community-dwelling older adults.
This pilot study will be conducted to compare loneliness and apathy in lonely individuals without dementia at baseline who receive a virtual group reminiscence therapy intervention (vGRT). The intervention will be delivered weekly over 12 weeks. Loneliness and apathy will be assessed before and after the intervention as described in the Outcome Measures section of this registration. Feasibility will be assessed using quantitative and qualitative measures including feasibility of screening and enrollment, acceptability, and program satisfaction. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with a subset of 30 individuals to explore acceptability, barriers, and facilitators of the intervention.
This study will provide evidence for the feasibility of a virtual group reminiscence therapy for community dwelling older adults to reduce loneliness and apathy. This approach is both innovative and pragmatic because it will leverage an existing community-based service, with an established infrastructure and track record within the community to deliver the intervention. As such, the proposed research has the potential for broad implications for community-based research and aligns with multiple translational science principles.
236 studies on the registry are indexed under Social Isolation; 61 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 80 across 198 interventional studies indexed under Social Isolation.
Browse Social Isolation studies →Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 416 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.
Of its 87 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 76 (87%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Virtual Group Reminiscence Therapy
Behavioral: Life Story Club
Virtual group reminiscence therapy will be provided by the Life Story Club©. Participants will meet virtually via Zoom© with their group (6-10 people) weekly for one hour over a 12-week period to exchange life stories and share in conversation. Groups will be conducted in entirely in English or Spanish, based on participant preference. Each week, the LSC© facilitator will guide the group with question prompts to encourage participants to share personal information, build friendships \& rapport, and create a sense of community. LSC© facilitators are trained in group interview techniques, technology management, and know how to respond appropriately to sensitive information that may emerge during group exchanges.
Change in Loneliness
Loneliness will be assessed using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale questionnaire. The UCLA Loneliness Scale is a 20-item measure that assesses how often a person feels disconnected from others. Participants provide responses using a 4-point Likert scale where 1 = never; 2 = rarely; 3 = sometimes; 4 = always, for an overall possible scoring range of 20-80, such that higher scores are associated with increased loneliness. Positively worded items in the questionnaire must be reverse-coded before reporting. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of an increase in loneliness from baseline and negative values a decrease in loneliness from baseline. Group scores will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Change in Apathy
Apathy will be assessed using the self-reported Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-S). The AES-S is an 18-item questionnaire that addresses characteristics of goal directed behavior that reflects apathy including behavioral, cognitive, and emotional indicators. Participants provide responses based on a 4-point Likert scale where 1 = not at all true; 2 = slightly true; 3 = somewhat true; and 4 = very true, for an overall possible scoring range of 18-72, such that higher scores are associated with greater apathy. Positively worded items in the scale must be reverse-coded before reporting. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increased apathy from baseline and negative values decreased apathy from baseline. Group scores will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Change in cognition
Cognition will be assessed using a version of the Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA). The T-MoCA is a 22-item phone-administered exam which assesses a range of global cognitive domains including attention, memory, language, and orientation. Each item is one point yielding an overall possible scoring range of 0-22, with higher scores being indicative of better cognitive function. Scores of 18 or below are generally suggestive of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increased cognition from baseline and negative values decreased cognition from baseline. Group scores will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics. To reduce practice effect Version (V)8.1 will be administered at baseline, V8.2 at 3 months, and V8.3 at 6 months. Scoring ranges are identical for all 3 versions.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Change in Meaning and Purpose
Meaning and purpose will be assessed as a composite measure using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Meaning and Purpose 4-item scale. The 4-item scale is designed to assess an individual's subjective experience of meaning and purpose in life. Participants provide responses on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5 for an overall possible scoring range of 4-20, such that higher scores are associated with greater meaning and purpose. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increased experiences of meaning and purpose from baseline and negative values decreased experiences of meaning and purpose from baseline. Group results will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics
Time frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Depressive symptoms will be assessed by administration of the Geriatric Depression Scale - Short Form (GDS-15), The GDS-15 is a 15-item questionnaire in which participants provide a dichotomous (Yes/No) response as to how they have felt over the prior week. Answers suggestive of depression are bolded/italicized on the questionnaire (may either be 'Yes' or 'No' depending on the item). A score of 1 point is assigned for each bolded/italicized response such that higher scores are associated with more depressive symptoms. A score of 0 to 5 is normal. A score greater than 5 suggests depression. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increase in depressive symptoms from baseline and negative values a decrease in depressive symptoms from baseline. Results will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Change in Social Support
Social Support will be assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Scale. The MOS is a 19-item multidimensional, self-administered instrument that measures the availability of support, if needed. The overall social support component of the MOS Social Support scale will be used. Participants provide responses on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5 for an overall possible scoring range of 19-95, such that higher scores are associated with greater availability of social support. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increased social support and purpose from baseline and negative values decreased social support from baseline. Group results will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics
Time frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Plan to share: Undecided — Data sharing to be determined.
Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 28 months after the start.
Of 155 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Social Isolation, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 28 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 156 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36.
Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Sep 25, 2026: primary completion Aug 2026 → Dec 2027 and completion Aug 2026 → Dec 2027.
Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.