ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06908395AgeLightUpdated Jul 10, 2025

Impact Of Everyday Light Exposure Patterns On Health

An interventional study of 10-day ambulatory assessment in everyday life combined with two laboratory office days in Healthy Male and Female Subjects and Healthy Elderly, sponsored by RWTH Aachen University. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-10.

Sponsored by RWTH Aachen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2024, registered Mar 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the present study is to characterize everyday light conditions of younger and older adults and to consider them in relation to cardiovascular, metabolic and psychological health. An ambulatory assessment approach will be used over 12 days, measuring physiological parameters and daily thoughts, behaviors and experiences of different age groups using wearable technologies (e.g., light sensors, activity trackers, continuous glucose monitors) and smartphone-based self-reports (e.g., mood, vitality).

At the beginning of the study, the degeneration of the lens and retina of the participants is objectively quantified by ophthalmologists. On the last two days, participants will spend one working day in dim light and another in bright light in randomized order under the same measurement protocol as before in order to experimentally assess their sensitivity to light and its health effects.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed as an observatory field study of characterizing younger and older adults' everyday life in terms of light exposure patterns as well as cardiovascular, metabolic and psychological health parameters over 10 days continuously through wearables and smartphone-based self-reports (ambulatory assessment period). On the first day of data collection, each participant will undergo an extensive eye examination at the Institute of Ophthalmology, particularly an Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) scan will conducted and by means of a macular pigment reflectometer the difference between the light entering and leaving the eye across the visual spectrum will be determined as a marker of lense yellowing. Thereafter, participants start wearing the wearable sensors (continuous glucose monitors, light loggers worn as a necklace) and instructions on how to complete the smartphone-based self-report forms are provided. Participants are asked to take pictures of every food or drink (except of water) and upload these pictures through the m-Path app, these photos will be later linked to the continuous glucose monitor data. Data will be collected from the first evening onwards (ca. 18:00 h). After the ambulatory assessment period under free-living conditions, participants will spend the 11th and 12th day in a controlled office room environment from 08:30 to 17:00 h. In a randomized cross-over design, the 11th and 12th day will be spent in either bright (1250 lux) or dim office lighting (10 lux). On these days, participants will continue to wear the wearables and complete the expanded smartphone-based self-reports mostly similar to the 10-day ambulatory assessment period. Between day 11 and 12, participants will leave controlled conditions from 17:00 h on day 11 to 08:30 h on day 12. On day 11 and 12, participants will receive a standardized fluid meals for breakfast and lunch, and are otherwise instructed to avoid any food, caloric or caffeinated beverages between 08:30 and 17:00 h. On these two days, skin temperature sensors will be placed on four different skin regions, and blood pressure will be manually measured at regular intervals between 08:30 h and 17:00 h. After removing all wearables on day 12, the study ends at 17:30 h. Over these 12 days of data collection, participants will be asked to keep their bedtimes at home as consistent as possible between days, and on day 11 and 12 they will be instructed to come to the office facilities fasted without any caloric intake after 22:00 h on the previous evening of day 10 and 11, respectively.

The two comparative groups formed in this study consist of 30 younger adults (18-35 years) and 30 older adults (60-80 years), both females and males will be included, and the aim is to match both groups with respect to sex (i.e. ideally 15 women and 15 men per group). The age contrast in the two groups is chosen, as substantial differences in degeneration of the lenses and retina within the eye can be expected.

For the sample size calculation of n = 30 per group, we refer to Zauner et al. (Zauner et al., 2023), who created a procedure to calculate statistical power and required sample size for wearable light-logging data. For most light-logging metrics, their approach shows that for strong differences in light exposure patterns (i.e., winter vs. summer) even smaller samples are sufficient (n = 3-24). We do not expect that differences between age groups are that strong as seasonal differences. However, we are confident that effects of about d = 0.7 could be detected with our design (n = 30 per group). Considering some drop-out, we anticipate that we will have to enroll 70 participants in total.

With the primary hypothesis of this study being that younger and older individuals differ in their light exposure patterns in everyday life, the two main explorative goals of the AgeLight study are to:

  • characterize light exposure patterns in younger and older adults and their link to cardiovascular, metabolic, and psychological health
  • identify determining factors of an individual's sensitivity to light and its health effects (such as degeneration of the lens and retina)
02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Male and Female Subjects
  • Healthy Elderly

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spectral diet
  • ambulatory assessment
  • daylight
  • m-path
  • eye degeneration
  • lense yellowing
  • continuous glucose monitoring
  • healthy aging
  • light sensitivity
  • melanopic EDI
03

In context

Photophobia

43 studies on the registry are indexed under Photophobia; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is above the median of 43 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Photophobia.

Browse Photophobia studies →

Lead sponsor

RWTH Aachen University is the lead sponsor of 230 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 18-35 or 60-80 years old
  • Voluntary participation, signed consent form
  • Owns an Android or iOS Smartphone compatible with the m-Path App
  • Generally healthy (self-reported)
  • Non-smoker for at least 12 months (self-reported)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy (for female participants) (self-reported)
  • Night-shift worker
  • Eye diseases (e.g. glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy conditions after retinal detachment / retinal blood vessel occlusions)
  • Pseudophakic eyes
  • Psychological disorders: insomnia, depression, bipolar disorder and generalized anxiety disorder
  • Wearing specially-filtered glasses
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    10 days ambulatory assessment + 1 office day in bright light + 1 office day in dim light

    Day 11 is spent under laboratory conditions in bright (1250 lux) office lighting from 08:30 to 17:00 h. Day 12 is spent under laboratory conditions in dim (10 lux) office lighting from 08:30 to 17:00 h.

    Other: 10-day ambulatory assessment in everyday life combined with two laboratory office days

  • Experimental
    10 days ambulatory assessment + 1 office day in dim light + 1 office day in bright light

    Day 11 is spent under laboratory conditions in dim (10 lux) office lighting from 08:30 to 17:00 h. Day 12 is spent under laboratory conditions in bright (1250 lux) office lighting from 08:30 to 17:00 h.

    Other: 10-day ambulatory assessment in everyday life combined with two laboratory office days

Interventions

  • Other10-day ambulatory assessment in everyday life combined with two laboratory office days

    Participants undergo a 10-day ambulatory assessment period wearing a continuous glucose monitor and a light logger as a necklace as well as completing short questionnaires through a smartphone app at regular intervals every day. On the first day, participants also undergo an extensive eye examination. Day 11 and 12 are spent in either dim or bright office lighting in randomized order.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean melanopic EDI (lux) from 09:00 to 17:00 h (daytime in European winter months)

    Measured via light loggers (ActLumus) worn as a necklace

    Time frame: Over the 10-day ambulatory assessment period

  2. Mean melanopic EDI (lux) 2 hours before individual bedtime

    Measured via light loggers (ActLumus) worn as a necklace

    Time frame: Over the 10-day ambulatory assessment period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lense degeneration

    The macular pigment reflectometer will record the difference between the light entering and leaving the eye across the visual spectrum. Spectral analysis of the reflected light provides an adequate estimate of the yellowing of the intra-ocular lens.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Macular and retinal thickness

    ophthalmologic evaluation of an Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) scan

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Interstitial glucose levels

    Interstitial glucose levels measured by continuous glucose monitors

    Time frame: Over the 10-day ambulatory assessment period, and specifically levels of day 11 and day 12 between 8:30 and 17:00 h upon controlled office lighting

  4. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Manually measured via automated blood pressure cuffs

    Time frame: 09:00, 10:30, 12:00, 13:00, 14:30, 16:00 and 17:00 on day 11 and 12

  5. Heart rate

    Manually measured via automated blood pressure cuffs

    Time frame: 09:00, 10:30, 12:00, 13:00, 14:30, 16:00 and 17:00 h on day 11 and 12

  6. Skin temperature

    in °C assessed via wireless temperature sensors (iButtons) placed on the hand, neck, clavicular and shin

    Time frame: from 09:00 to 17:00 h on day 11 and 12

  7. Alertness

    measured via Karolinska Sleepiness Scale through the m-Path app

    Time frame: at least 6 times daily over all 12 study days

  8. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    PSQI score calculated based on a digital questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCU)

    Chronotype score calculated based on a digital questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Subjective sleep quality

    measured via Consensus Sleep Diary through the m-Path app

    Time frame: every morning over the 12 study days

Other outcomes

  1. Digital food photo diary

    Participants take photos of every caffeine- or calorie-containing food item that they consume and upload them in the m-Path app

    Time frame: continuously throughout the 12-day study period

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University hospital at RWTH Aachen
    Aachen, 52074, Germany
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study protocol can be requested via email to study officials.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: The study protocol is available from the 20th of March 2025 onwards for at least 5 years.

Access criteria: The study protocol can be requested via email to study officials.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2024 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 7 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 20, 2025
First posted
Apr 3, 2025
StartActual
Nov 18, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06908395
Responsible party
Jan-Frieder Harmsen (Principal Investigator, RWTH Aachen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 3, 2025
Start date
Nov 18, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 10, 2025

Study contacts

Jan-Frieder Harmsen, PhD
principal investigator · RWTH Aachen University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion