A Phase 4 interventional study of Recaticimab and Statin and Statin in Intracranial Atherosclerosis, Intracranial Artery Stenosis and Atherosclerotic Plaque, sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Recruiting at 19 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-12.
Sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitor combined with statin therapy compared to statin monotherapy in reversing asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis, assessed using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the intracranial vessel walls.
Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke worldwide, accounting for approximately 10-20% of all ischemic strokes in Europe and the United States, and up to 50% in Asian populations. While evidence-based management strategies for symptomatic ICAS have been progressively established over the past decades, asymptomatic ICAS - representing an earlier-stage, broader, high-risk population - has long been under-recognized and under-studied. Asymptomatic ICAS (stenosis > 50%) has a reported prevalence of approximately 6%-13%, and is associated with a substantially increased risk of future cerebrovascular events. Moreover, accumulating evidence has demonstrated that asymptomatic ICAS is independently associated with cognitive decline and incident dementia, likely due to chronic downstream hypo-perfusion and cumulative ischemic injury. Therefore, the development of systematic, evidence-based, and precision prevention strategies for asymptomatic ICAS is essential for reducing the overall disease burden attributable to ICAS-related cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative disorders.
It is well established that dysregulation of lipid metabolism is a fundamental pathophysiological mechanism driving the initiation and progression of ICAS, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been consistently identified as the primary therapeutic target for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and for the prevention of ischemic stroke. Existing evidence has demonstrated that reductions in lipid levels and the regression of atherosclerotic plaques are closely associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events. Statin therapy remains the cornerstone of lipid-lowering treatment, capable of stabilizing atherosclerotic plaques and improving clinical outcomes. However, limitations of statins such as the plateau effect of LDL-C reduction, intolerance, and poor adherence in certain patients necessitate alternative or adjunctive lipid-lowering strategies. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, human monoclonal antibodies targeting PCSK9, have shown excellent efficacy in achieving intensive LDL-C reduction and have been extensively validated for safety in large clinical trials. Recently published studies have highlighted the potential of PCSK9 inhibitors in plaque regression and stabilization beyond coronary and carotid arteries. The SLICE-CEA CardioLink-8 trial demonstrated that adding evolocumab to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy for 6 months significantly reduced the lipid-rich necrotic core in asymptomatic high-risk carotid plaques. Similarly, the ARCHITECT study revealed that alirocumab in combination with high-intensity statin therapy led to significant regression of coronary plaque burden and enhanced plaque stability in asymptomatic patients over a 78-week period. Several observational studies have indicated that intensive lipid-lowering therapy may reverse asymptomatic ICAS. However, to date, no clinical trials have specifically evaluated the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in addition to statin therapy in patients with asymptomatic ICAS. This represents a critical evidence gap, as these patients constitute a broader, earlier, and high-risk population for cerebrovascular events.
The PISTIAS-2 is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, open-label, blinded end-point, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitor combined with statin therapy compared to statin monotherapy in patients with asymptomatic ICAS. Patients aged 18 to 80 years with asymptomatic ICAS, defined as 50% to 99% stenosis in at least one major intracranial artery without a prior history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, will be enrolled for 24-week treatment. Eligible participants will be centrally randomized into two groups: (1) Experimental group [PCSK9 inhibitor combined with statin therapy]: Recaticimab 450 mg every 12 weeks combined with rosuvastatin 10 mg q.n. or atorvastatin 20 mg q.n. (2) Control group [Statin alone]: Rosuvastatin 10 mg q.n. or atorvastatin 20 mg q.n. Considering inter-individual variability in lipid-lowering response, ezetimibe 10 mg once daily is permitted at the discretion of the study physician based on the predefined criteria: (1) patients already receiving statin therapy prior to enrollment whose LDL-C remains above 2.6 mmol/L, and (2) statin-naïve patients whose LDL-C exceeds 2.6 mmol/L at the 12-week lipid profile reassessment. In this trial, we employed a novel PCSK9 inhibitor, Recaticimab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody engineered with a strategic YTE mutation in its Fc region, which enhances its affinity for the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). This modification reduces FcRn-mediated antibody catabolism, thereby extending the half-life of Recaticimab and enabling a prolonged dosing interval of up to 12 weeks.
The primary outcome is the change in intracranial plaque burden from baseline to week 24, measured by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI).The key secondary outcomes include: change in stenosis degree from baseline to week 24, time from randomization to the first-ever ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and change in plasma marker glial fibrillary acidic protein(GFAP) and neurofilament light (NfL). Other secondary outcomes include: time from randomization to the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, new-onset silent cerebral infarction, percentage of patients who achieved LDL-C goal at week 24, percentage change in LDL-C relative to baseline, and change in plasma marker Aβ40, Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40. In addition, several pre-specified exploratory outcomes have been defined for this study. Details are provided in the "Outcome Measures" section.
After the 24-week treatment period, an extended prospective follow-up (clinical or telephone follow-up) will continue for more than one year to document long-term effects.The sample size is calculated based on the primary outcome and a total of 300 participants are anticipated. An interim analysis will be conducted when 50% of the participants (i.e., 150 subjects) have completed the 24-week follow-up with HR-MRI. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will oversee the overall conduct of the trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
Recaticimab (450mg every 12 weeks subcutaneously) combined with rosuvastatin 10mg qn or atorvastatin 20mg qn
Drug: Recaticimab and Statin
Rosuvastatin 10mg qn or atorvastatin 20mg qn
Drug: Statin
Recaticimab (450mg every 12 weeks subcutaneously) combined with rosuvastatin 10mg qn or atorvastatin 20mg qn
Rosuvastatin 10mg qn or atorvastatin 20mg qn
Change in plaque burden from baseline to week 24
Intracranial plaque burden was assessed at maximum stenosis site by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, performed at baseline and the end of the treatment period (24 \[±1\] week) on the same machine. The plaque burden is calculated according to the following formula: plaque burden = \[(vessel wall cross-sectional area - lumen cross-sectional area ) / vessel wall cross-sectional area\] ×100%. The outcome will be centrally assessed by an independent core imaging laboratory blinded to treatment allocation according to a predefined imaging analysis protocol.
Time frame: From baselie to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in stenosis degree from baseline to week 24
The degree of stenosis is calculated according to the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) criteria using the formula: \[1-(Dstenosis/Dnormal)\]×100%. Dstenosis represents the vessel diameter at the most stenotic site of the intracranial artery, and Dnormal represents the normal vessel diameter at a reference site.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the first-ever ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack
Ischemic Stroke: Defined as an acute cerebral infarction with clinical signs or imaging evidence of a new acute focal neurological injury persisting for more than 24 hours, excluding other non-ischemic causes. Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA): Defined as a sudden onset of focal neurological deficit due to cerebral or retinal ischemia, which completely resolves within 24 hours. Imaging (CT or MRI) must show no evidence of a new cerebral infarction. Other non-ischemic causes, such as brain infection, trauma, tumor, epilepsy, severe metabolic disorders, or progressive neurological diseases, must be excluded.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plasma marker glial fibrillary acidic protein(GFAP)
Change in plasma marker glial fibrillary acidic protein(GFAP) quantified using the Single Molecule Array platform from baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plasma marker neurofilament light(NfL)
Change in plasma marker Neurofilament light(NfL) quantified using the Single Molecule Array platform from baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events
Composite major adverse cardiovascular endpoints includes ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality as a cluster
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Silent cerebral infarction
New-onset silent cerebral infarction is defined as an imaging-detected infarct without acute clinical symptoms
Time frame: at 24 weeks of treatment
Percentage of patients who achieved LDL-C goal at week 24
Percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C target at week 24 of treatment, defined as LDL-C \< 1.8 mmol/L or LDL-C \< 2.6 mmol/L based on ASCVD risk assessment.
Time frame: at 24 weeks of treatment
Percentage change in LDL-C relative to baseline
Percentage change in LDL-C level at 24 weeks of treatment relative to baseline
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in Plasma marker Aβ42/Aβ40
Change in plasma markers Aβ42/Aβ40 from baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the first occurrence of transient ischemic attack
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA): Defined as a sudden onset of focal neurological deficit due to cerebral or retinal ischemia, which completely resolves within 24 hours. Imaging (CT or MRI) must show no evidence of a new cerebral infarction. Other non-ischemic causes, such as brain infection, trauma, tumor, epilepsy, severe metabolic disorders, or progressive neurological diseases, must be excluded.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the first occurrence of ischemic stroke
Ischemic Stroke: Defined as an acute cerebral infarction with clinical signs or imaging evidence of a new acute focal neurological injury persisting for more than 24 hours, excluding other non-ischemic causes.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of any stroke
Any stroke includes ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of myocardial infarction
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of myocardial infarction
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of vascular death
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of vascular death
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of any death
All-cause mortality will be calculated between two arms
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in cognitive scale scores
Cognitive function will be evaluated via MMSE and MOCA at baseline and week 24
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in traditional lipid parameters
Changes in traditional lipid profiles, especially total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG) and HDL-C.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in Lipoprotein (a) level
Non-traditional lipid parameters such as Lipoprotein (a) level will be detected at baseline and week 24
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Visit-to-visit lipid variability of LDL-C
Lipid variability during the treatment period, which can be evaluated by the following indicators: coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), variability independent of the mean (VIM), average real variability (ARV).
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
Inflammatory markers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) will be detected at baseline and week 24
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plasma marker pTau217
Markers of neurological disorders such asplasma marker pTau217 will be detected at baseline and week 24
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in DNA methylation status of peripheral blood cells
DNA methylation, particularly RNF213, an important epigenetic factor, may play a role in the progression of ICAS.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype
Previous studies have shown that lipid-lowering has an obvious scavenging effect on senescent cells. Senescence associated β-galactosidase, SA-β-gal, is thought to be a sign of aging
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in length of plaque
length of plaque was evaluated by high-resolution MRI at baseline and week 24
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plaque maximum thickness
the maximum thickness of plaque was evaluated by high-resolution MRI at baseline and week 24
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in the outer-wall boundary area at the maximal stenotic site
the outer-wall boundary area at the maximal stenotic site was evaluated by high-resolution MRI at baseline and week 24
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in remodeling index of the plaque
Remodeling index of the plaque is calculated by the ratio of the diameter of the lumen at the most severe lesion to the diameter of the proximal reference lumen, positive remodeling defined as remodeling index \> 1.1
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plaque enhancement
plaque enhancement will be detected via contrast enhanced high- resolution MRI
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in brain volume
Total brain volume will be evaluated by MRI 3D-T1WI at baseline and week 24
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in cortical thickness
The thickness and surface area of cerebral cortex in all and different brain regions were quantitatively determined based on MRI
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in cerebral small vessel disease burden
cerebral small vessel disease burden were quantitatively determined based on MRI at baseline and week 24
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in white matter hyperintensity
White matter hyperintensity (WMH) in all and different brain regions were quantitatively determined based on MRI
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in collateral circulation status
Collateral circulation status will be assessed using standardized imaging-based grading scales to evaluate the extent and quality of collateral blood flow.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Adverse events
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical trial subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Serious Adverse Events
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: (1) results in death; (2) is life-threatening; (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4)results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; (5) is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; (6) is otherwise considered medically significant by the investigator.
Time frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Plan to share: Undecided
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis→
Peking Union Medical College Hospital