ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06884332SPINALUpdated Sep 23, 2025

Spinal Palliation in Irradiation for Neoplastic Analgesia and Life Quality

An interventional study of Sparing irradiation and Conventional spinal irradiation in Bone Metastasis and Oncology Pain, sponsored by Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine. Recruiting at 4 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-23.

Sponsored by Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
598
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the impact of reducing the volume of palliative metastatic bone irradiation on analgesic effectiveness at day 30 and to evaluate the efficiency of telemonitoring in identifying patients who could benefit from Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and require care.

These objectives will be addressed in a multicenter, randomized, prospective study with two arms:

A standard arm with spinal irradiation without sparing the adjacent vertebrae. An experimental arm with spinal irradiation sparing the adjacent vertebrae. The results will determine whether reducing the irradiated volume can maintain effective pain relief while minimizing side effects.

Read the detailed description

Palliative analgesic radiotherapy (RT) is used to relieve pain in patients with bone metastases. This technique involves irradiating the vertebrae above and below the ones responsible for the pain. Traditional two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D-RT) was characterized by a physical penumbra that could extend up to 50% of a vertebra's height, leading to underdosing of the target volume and, consequently, reduced analgesic effectiveness.

However, computed tomography (CT) scans or CT-based imaging have replaced these practices, allowing for high precision in delineating target volumes. Despite advancements in irradiation techniques, the physical penumbra is now negligible with modern machines, reducing the need for large margins and thereby limiting side effects associated with the irradiation of healthy tissues.

These factors have led us to conduct a clinical trial to assess the impact of reducing the volume of palliative metastatic bone irradiation on analgesic effectiveness at day 30 (D30) and to evaluate the efficiency of telemonitoring in identifying patients who could benefit from Patient-PROs and require care.

These objectives will be pursued in a multicenter, randomized, prospective study with two arms:

A standard arm, with spinal irradiation without sparing the adjacent vertebrae. An experimental arm, with spinal irradiation sparing the adjacent vertebrae. The results will determine whether reducing the irradiated volume can maintain effective pain relief while minimizing side effects. This could lead to changes in current palliative radiotherapy practices, reduce toxicity risks, and improve patients' quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bone Metastasis
  • Oncology Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bone metastasis
  • Irradiation
  • Palliative
  • Analgesic
03

In context

Cancer Pain

310 studies on the registry are indexed under Cancer Pain; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 598 is above the median of 62 across 235 interventional studies indexed under Cancer Pain.

Browse Cancer Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with bone pain related to at least 1 or more bone of spinal location, contiguous or not, cervical (excluding C1), thoracic, lumbar or sacral up to and including S2; a patient can be included even if he or she is irradiated concomitantly or not for analgesic purposes on another non-spinal bone metastatic site. Bone lesions are objective on an imaging examination less than 3 months old: CT and/or MRI and/or PET and/or bone scintigraphy;
  • Patient with at least moderate pain with EN ≥ 5;
  • Patient on analgesic drug treatment for at least 7 days or poor tolerance of analgesics;
  • Patient irradiated for palliative analgesic purposes. Post-cementoplasty irradiation is possible; an extension to the soft tissues is not a to inclusion;
  • Patient with a validated palliative bone irradiation plan: 8 Gy / 1 fr or 20 Gy / 5 fr;
  • Patient with planning only in static IMRT, arc therapy or helical tomotherapy;
  • Patient with a primary cancer or a haemopathy;
  • Patient currently undergoing or not a specific oncological systemic treatment, left to the discretion of the investigating physician;
  • Patient currently undergoing or not a treatment with bisphosphonates and denosumab, left to the discretion of the investigating physician;
  • WHO ≤ 2;
  • Patient with a ≥ 3 months;
  • Patient able and agreeing to follow all study procedures in accordance with the protocol;
  • Patient having understood, signed and dated the consent form;
  • Patient affiliated to the social security system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patient;
  • Patient undergoing stereotaxic irradiation;
  • Patient undergoing oligometastatic disease;
  • Patient undergoing re-irradiation unless the dose is not limiting to OARs;
  • Patient treated with RT2D (conventional 2-dimensional radiotherapy) or RT3D (conventional 3-dimensional radiotherapy);
  • Patient with MESCC ( epidural spinal cord compression) except for a Bilsky grade \< 1b;
  • Patient who does not have a means of responding to online questionnaires;
  • Patient and their entourage who cannot read or express themselves in French;
  • Visually impaired patient;
  • Patient already included in another therapeutic trial with an experimental molecule;
  • Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship (including curatorship).
  • Pregnant woman, likely to be pregnant, or breastfeeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
598 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional spinal irradiation

    Spinal irradiation without sparing the adjacent vertebrae.

    Radiation: Conventional spinal irradiation

  • Experimental
    Sparing irradiation

    Spinal irradiation while sparing the adjacent vertebrae.

    Radiation: Sparing irradiation

Interventions

  • RadiationSparing irradiation

    For "Sparing irradiation" arm the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) = Growth Tumor Volume (GTV) + entire vertebra opposite.

  • RadiationConventional spinal irradiation

    For "conventional spinal irradiation" arm, Clinical Target Volume (CTV ) = Growth Tumor Volume (GTV) + entire vertebra opposite + 1 vertebra above and below.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Impact of Reducing the Volume of Palliative Bone Metastatic Irradiation on Analgesic Efficacy

    Pain response at day 30 at the site of the irradiated lesion will be assessed according to the international consensus definitions on bone metastases, using a numerical scale (0 to 10) and the consumption of equivalent opioids.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at day 30 after the first irradiation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tolerance of Reducing the Volume of Palliative Bone Metastatic Irradiation

    Tolerance will be assessed by the occurrence of toxicities according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the 30 days after the first irradiation session

  2. Impact of a remote monitoring tool on quality of life

    Quality of life will be assessed using questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C15PAL ; the score scale is from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the 30 days after the first irradiation session

  3. Evaluation of Quality of life Bone Metastases Module

    Quality of life will be assessed using questionnaires EORTC QLQ-Bone Metastases (BM)22. The score scale ranges from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the 30 days after the first irradiation session

  4. Level of adherence

    The level of adherence will be assessed based on the rate of compliance with completing the online questionnaires by the patient or their caregivers. The score scale ranges from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 45 days after the first irradiation

  5. Use of a remote monitoring tool

    The handling of the digital tool will be assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS).The score scale ranges from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 45 days after the first irradiation

  6. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be measured according to the PACIC (Patient Assessment Chronic Illness Care) score. The total score ranges from 1 to 5.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 30 months after the first irradiation

  7. Medical care patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be measured according the questionnaire concerning medical care (PEC). The score scale ranges from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 30 months after the first irradiation.

  8. Rate of analgesic re-irradiation

    The administration of a supplementary dose of irradiation between Day 30 and Month 12 will be recorded

    Time frame: From enrollment to 30 days after the first irradiation session and after 12 months

  9. Correlation between dosimetric constraints for organs at risk (OARs) and the associated grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 acute toxicities

    Doses to OARs will be collected for the main organs at risk (OARs) in the vicinity by exporting the dose-volume histograms for each organ at risk.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after the first irradiation session.

  10. Construction of a Prognostic Score

    A prognostic score will be constructed from the variables of all the prognostic factors collected in this study. The score scale ranges from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after the first irradiation session.

  11. Overall survival

    Overall survival will be calculated as the time elapsed between the end of treatment and the date of death, from all causes.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after the first irradiation session.

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, Dahlin CM, Blinderman CD, Jacobsen J, Pirl WF, Billings JA, Lynch TJ. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):733-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678. PubMed 20818875 ↗
  • Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC, Bilsky MH, Shaffrey CI, Berven SH, Harrop JS, Fehlings MG, Boriani S, Chou D, Schmidt MH, Polly DW, Biagini R, Burch S, Dekutoski MB, Ganju A, Gerszten PC, Gokaslan ZL, Groff MW, Liebsch NJ, Mendel E, Okuno SH, Patel S, Rhines LD, Rose PS, Sciubba DM, Sundaresan N, Tomita K, Varga PP, Vialle LR, Vrionis FD, Yamada Y, Fourney DR. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 15;35(22):E1221-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e16ae2. PubMed 20562730 ↗
  • Basch E, Barbera L, Kerrigan CL, Velikova G. Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:122-134. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200383. PubMed 30231381 ↗
  • Marino D, Baratelli C, Guida G, Turco CGC, Lacidogna G, Sperti E, Vignani F, De Luca E, Zichi C, Audisio M, Ballaminut D, Bellezza A, Chiotto P, Ciriolo G, Comite R, Codegone F, Florio S, Fusco L, Polimeno L, Pozzi D, Zilio E, Terzolo S, Di Maio M. Impact of adoption of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice on the accuracy of symptom reporting in medical records of cancer patients. Recenti Prog Med. 2020 Dec;111(12):740-748. doi: 10.1701/3509.34965. PubMed 33362171 ↗
  • Basch E, Iasonos A, McDonough T, Barz A, Culkin A, Kris MG, Scher HI, Schrag D. Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Nov;7(11):903-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70910-X. PubMed 17081915 ↗
  • Di Maio M, Gallo C, Leighl NB, Piccirillo MC, Daniele G, Nuzzo F, Gridelli C, Gebbia V, Ciardiello F, De Placido S, Ceribelli A, Favaretto AG, de Matteis A, Feld R, Butts C, Bryce J, Signoriello S, Morabito A, Rocco G, Perrone F. Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):910-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9334. Epub 2015 Jan 26. PubMed 25624439 ↗
  • Stromgren AS, Groenvold M, Sorensen A, Andersen L. Symptom recognition in advanced cancer. A comparison of nursing records against patient self-rating. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Oct;45(9):1080-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450905.x. PubMed 11683656 ↗
  • Basch E. The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 11;362(10):865-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911494. No abstract available. PubMed 20220181 ↗
  • Del Gaudio AC, Carpenter PJ, Stein LS, Morrow G. Characteristics of patients completing referrals from an emergency department to a psychiatric outpatient clinic. Compr Psychiatry. 1977 May-Jun;18(3):301-7. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(77)90026-8. No abstract available. PubMed 858248 ↗
  • Klish DS, Grossman P, Allen PK, Rhines LD, Chang EL. Irradiation of spinal metastases: should we continue to include one uninvolved vertebral body above and below in the radiation field? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.2007. Epub 2010 Nov 11. PubMed 21074335 ↗
  • Alcorn S, Cortes AA, Bradfield L, Brennan M, Dennis K, Diaz DA, Doung YC, Elmore S, Hertan L, Johnstone C, Jones J, Larrier N, Lo SS, Nguyen QN, Tseng YD, Yerramilli D, Zaky S, Balboni T. External Beam Radiation Therapy for Palliation of Symptomatic Bone Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 Sep-Oct;14(5):377-397. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.018. Epub 2024 May 22. PubMed 38788923 ↗
  • van der Velden J, Willmann J, Spalek M, Oldenburger E, Brown S, Kazmierska J, Andratschke N, Menten J, van der Linden Y, Hoskin P. ESTRO ACROP guidelines for external beam radiotherapy of patients with uncomplicated bone metastases. Radiother Oncol. 2022 Aug;173:197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.024. Epub 2022 May 31. PubMed 35661676 ↗
  • Chow E, Hoskin P, Mitera G, Zeng L, Lutz S, Roos D, Hahn C, van der Linden Y, Hartsell W, Kumar E; International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party. Update of the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Apr 12. PubMed 21489705 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 72 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cancer Pain, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 75 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 3, 2025
First posted
Mar 19, 2025
StartActual
Jul 2, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 2, 2029
Last update
Sep 23, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06884332
Lead sponsor
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 19, 2025
Start date
Jul 2, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2025

Study contacts

Jean-Christophe JCF FAIVRE, MD.
Contact
jc.faivre@nancy.unicancer.fr
+33383594072 ext. 4072
Aurélien LAMBERT, MD.
Contact
a.lambert@nancy.unicancer.fr
+33383594123 ext. 4123
Nour MAMMARI HALABI, PhD.
study chair · Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion