ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07326800MAEva-MCTUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Efficacy of the MAEva Program (Meditation, Acceptance, and Commitment to Values) Among Patients Treated For Breast Cancer.

An interventional study of MAEva program (Meditation, Acceptance and Commitment to Values or "Méditation, Acceptation et Engagements en direction des valeurs") and Discussion group in Non Metastatic Breast Cancer, sponsored by Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
190
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The MAEva program combines Acceptance and Committment Therapy (ACT) and mindfulness practices. It is an open and circular intervention, in three sessions (Mindfulness, Acceptance, and Commitment to values). It is designed for cancer patients and was the subject of an initial study that explored its feasibility and acceptability, as well as the initial results on psychological well-being.

This randomized, multicenter clinical trial is necessary to demonstrate the efficacy of the MAEva program compared to a discussion group with non metastatic breast cancer patients.

Patients will be included and randomized into two arms:

  • In the first arm, patients will have the opportunity to participate in the MAEva program for nine consecutive weeks.
  • and the second arm patients will have the opportunity to participate in a discussion group for nine consecutive weeks.

The patients will be able to attend one session per week for nine consecutive weeks.

Quantitative assessments of quality of life, symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression, as well as psychological flexibility, will be conducted before the first session, after 3 weeks, 9 weeks, and 12 weeks.

Also, a qualitative analysis will be conducted based on satisfaction questionnaire and a semistructured interview performed after the end of the program. The interview analysis will described the extent to which the intervention is adapted to the realities on the ground and the needs of the target population. It will enable to identify how patients appropriate the psychological flexibility processes taught in the program in relation to the conceptual framework of ACT therapy (i.e., contact with the present moment, self-as-context, acceptance, defusion, values, and committed action) and integrate them into their daily lives.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non Metastatic Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • MAEva program
  • Mindfulness
  • Acceptance and commitment therapy
  • Quality of life
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 190 is above the median of 60 across 7,703 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with non- breast cancer,
  • Patients who are able and willing to follow all study procedures in accordance with the protocol,
  • Patients who have understood, signed, and dated the consent form,
  • Patients who are affiliated with the social security system,
  • Patients who are able to remain seated during the 1.5-hour sessions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cancer,
  • Presence of an acute psychiatric disorder: acute depression, unstable bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder (delusions, hallucinations), etc.
  • Presence of recurrent uncontrolled panic attacks (particularly related to hypochondriacal concerns),
  • Insufficient attentional resources for meditation: major attention, memory, or reasoning disorders,
  • Presence of cognitive and neurocognitive disorders and deficits,
  • Presence of deafness,
  • Current participation in another mindfulness program,
  • Persons deprived of their liberty or under guardianship (including curatorship),
  • Inability to undergo medical monitoring for the trial for geographical, social, or psychological reasons.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
190 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MAEva program group

    The MAEva program is an open group intervention (i.e., patients can enter the program at any session), and it is circular (i.e., it is possible to do the three sessions in any order and repeat the program to benefit from a training effect). Patients are invited to participate according to their possibilities and without having to commit to carrying out the whole program (i.e., it is fully acceptable for a patient to participate in only one or two of the three sessions of a complete cycle). Patients will be able to participate in one weekly session for nine consecutive weeks.

    Other: MAEva program (Meditation, Acceptance and Commitment to Values or "Méditation, Acceptation et Engagements en direction des valeurs")

  • Active comparator
    Discussion group

    The discussion group is structured according to the same schedule as MAEva program. It is an open group intervention (i.e., patients can enter at any session), and it is circular (i.e., it is possible to do the three sessions in any order and repeat the program to benefit from a training effect). Patients are invited to participate according to their possibilities and without having to commit to carrying out the whole program (i.e., it is fully acceptable for a patient to participate in only one or two of the three sessions of a complete cycle). Patients will be able to participate in one weekly session for nine consecutive weeks.

    Other: Discussion group

Interventions

  • OtherMAEva program (Meditation, Acceptance and Commitment to Values or "Méditation, Acceptation et Engagements en direction des valeurs")

    MAEva program combines ACT and mindfulness practices, and comprises three group sessions of 1 h 30 min each, following a weekly schedule. Each session addresses a specific theme and contains short meditative practices (10-15 min), as well as sharing times with feedback of experience and theoretical contributions: Session 1: Mindfulness Meditation (targeted processes: contact with the present moment and self-as-context), Session 2: Acceptance (targeted processes: acceptance and defusion), and Session 3: Commitment to Values (targeted processes: values and committed action). Between sessions, participants were encouraged to engage in daily practice of the ACT therapeutic processes covered. Moreover, they were invited to cultivate mindfulness in daily life through informal exercises, that is, to devote oneself attentively to routine activities.

    Also known as: Perceived Stress Scale, Anxiety and/or depression, Quality of life evaluations (Quality of Life Questionnaire, Breast Cancer module, Fatigue), Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory, Satisfaction questionnaire and semi-structured interview

  • OtherDiscussion group

    Discussion group comprises three group sessions of 1 h 30 min each, following a weekly schedule. Each session addresses a specific theme : Session 1: Treatments, Session 2: Fatigue, and Session 3: Social life. The facilitators will limit themselves to supportive interview techniques (listening, open-ended questions, rephrasing, expressing empathy) and, if necessary, will refer participants to the resources available at each center.

    Also known as: Perceived Stress Scale, Anxiety and/or depression, Quality of life evaluations (Quality of Life Questionnaire, Breast Cancer module, Fatigue), Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory, Satisfaction questionnaire and semi-structured interview

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Demonstrate the efficacy of the MAEva program versus discussion group on quality of life in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.

    Evolution in the overall QLQ-C30 quality of life (QoL) score at 12 weeks compared to a control group. Different dimensions of quality of life will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (QoL Questionnaire); It includes five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health status / QoL scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, A high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, A high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

    Time frame: At 12 weeks after first session

Secondary outcomes

  1. the MAEva program's efficacy on stress symptoms

    Improvement in symptoms of stress compared to a control group. Stress will be assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10).

    Time frame: From enrollement at 12 weeks after first session

  2. the MAEva program's efficacy on symptoms of anxiety and depression (identification of a cut-off level for anxiety and depression)

    Improvement in symptoms of anxiety, and depression compared to a control group. Anxiety and/or depression will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

    Time frame: From enrollment at 12 weeks after first session

  3. the MAEva program's efficacy on different dimensions of quality of life

    Assessement of quality of life compared to a control group. Different dimensions of quality of life will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Quality of Life Questionnaire); It includes five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health status / QoL scale.

    Time frame: From enrollment at 12 weeks after first session

  4. the MAEva program's efficacy on quality of life in breast cancer patients

    Assessement of quality of life compared to a control group. Quality of life in breast cancer patients will be assessed using the EORTC-BR23 (Breast Cancer module); it includes five multi-item scales to assess body image, sexual functioning, systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, and arm symptoms.

    Time frame: From enrollment at 12 weeks after first session

  5. the MAEva program's efficacy on fatigue

    Assessement of quality of life compared to a control group. Fatigue will be assessed using the EORTC-FA12 (Fatigue); It includes three multi-item scales to assess physical fatigue, emotional fatigue, and cognitive fatigue.

    Time frame: From enrollment at 12 weeks after first session

  6. the MAEva program's efficacy on Psychological Flexibility

    Assessment of psychological flexibility (Multidimensional Inventory of Psychological Flexibility (MPFI-24))

    Time frame: From enrollment at 12 weeks after first session

  7. the MAEva program's efficacy on the psychological processes involved in acceptance and commitment therapy

    Assessment of processes (i.e., contact with the present moment, self-as-context, acceptance, defusion, values, and committed action) at play during the intervention (semi-structured interviews (qualitative analysis))

    Time frame: At 12 weeks after first session

  8. Adherence

    Patient participation rate.

    Time frame: From enrollment at 9 weeks after first session

  9. Assessement of Satisfaction

    Assessment of patient satisfaction (subjective score between 1 and 10; open-ended questions (qualitative analysis)) Assessment of caregiver satisfaction (subjective score between 1 and 10; open-ended questions (qualitative analysis))

    Time frame: At 12 weeks after first session

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bourgognon F, Bechet D, Huin-Schohn C, Strelow A, Demarche L, Guillou M, Adam V, Fall E, Omorou AY. A mixed method feasibility and acceptability study of a flexible intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with cancer. Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 3;15:1409308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1409308. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39021646 ↗
09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2029, 36 months after the start.

Of 1,981 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 36 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,056 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 9, 2025
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
StartActual
Feb 16, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 16, 2029
CompletionEst.
Feb 16, 2029
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07326800
Lead sponsor
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
Start date
Feb 16, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 16, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 16, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Jean-Louis Merlin, Professor
Contact
jl.merlin@nancy.unicancer.fr
+33 3 83 59 84 00
Lydie Lemoine
Contact
l.lemoine@nancy.unincancer.fr
+33 3 83 59 86 89
François Bourgognon, MD
principal investigator · Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Denise BECHET, PhD
study chair · Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion