ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06874426Endo-OlfactUpdated Apr 23, 2025

The Impact of Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery on Olfaction

An observational study in Meningioma, Pituitary Disease and Pituitary Adenoma, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Recruiting at 3 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-23.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
154
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the research team will investigate the incidence and etiology of olfactory dysfunction following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery, by combining clinical assessments with histomolecular analysis.

Read the detailed description

The incidence of olfactory dysfunction following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery remains unclear in current research, and the results vary widely. Additionally, the pathophysiology of this postoperative olfactory dysfunction and the impact of this surgery on the trigeminal system has not been investigated to date. In this study, the investigators developed a state-of-the-art clinical pipeline with olfactory and trigeminal assessments, prior to and following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Furthermore, the investigators will collect surgical waste tissue from the posterior septal mucosa, which is removed during this procedure to gain access to the sphenoid sinus and the (para)sellar region. By performing histomolecular analysis, the research group aims to elucidate the pathophysiology of olfactory dysfunction following this surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meningioma
  • Pituitary Disease
  • Pituitary Adenoma
  • Craniopharyngioma
  • Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery
  • Olfactory Dysfunction

Keywords

  • olfactory dysfunction
  • trigeminal dysfunction
  • endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery
  • pituitary surgery
03

In context

Meningioma

255 studies on the registry are indexed under Meningioma; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 154 is above the median of 133 across 56 observational studies indexed under Meningioma.

Browse Meningioma studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 963 studies on the registry; 267 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients presenting with an indication for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for lesions in the anterior skull base (the parasellar region)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients scheduled for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing anosmia
  • Patients has a history of previous endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
154 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

    This intervention will be performed as part of the standard-of-care for patients scheduled for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for lesions in the (para)sellar region

    Also known as: endoscopic pituitary surgery, anterior skull base surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of olfactory dysfunction

    Time frame: From enrollment to the last evaluation 6 months postoperatively

  2. Incidence of trigeminal dysfunction

    Time frame: From enrollment to the last evaluation 6 months postoperatively

  3. Etiology of olfactory and trigeminal dysfunction following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

    Time frame: Until the end of study (at 3 years)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Risk factors for olfactory dysfunction following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

    Parameters such as smoking history, allergies, age, gender, co-morbidities will be investigated as possible covariates

    Time frame: From enrollment to the last evaluation 6 months postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • KU Leuven
    Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
    Recruiting
    • Julie van Waterschoot · Contactjulie.vanwaterschoot@kuleuven.be · 0477910294
    • Julie van Waterschoot · Sub investigator
    • Laura Van Gerven, Professor · Principal investigator
  • Max Planck Research Unit for Neurogenetics
    Frankfurt, Hessen 69, Germany
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site.

  • Leiden University Medical Center
    Leiden, Zuid-Holland 10702, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Maarten Kleijwegt · Contactm.c.kleijwegt@lumc.nl · 0477910294
    • Maarten Kleijwegt · Principal investigator
    • Marco Verstegen · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 45 months after the start.

Of 29 observational studies under Meningioma, half reached primary completion within 106 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 60. This study's planned 45 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 11, 2025
First posted
Mar 13, 2025
StartActual
Mar 18, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 2029
Last update
Apr 23, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06874426
Responsible party
Laura Van Gerven (Prof. dr., Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2025
Start date
Mar 18, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 23, 2025

Study contacts

Julie van Waterschoot
Contact
julie.vanwaterschoot@kuleuven.be
+32477910294

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion