ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06873477PETRAUpdated Mar 12, 2025

Evaluation of Patients Affected by Traumatic and Hypoxic-ischemic Brain Injury

An observational study in Brain Injuries and Brain Ischemia, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged Up to 20 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-12.

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
Up to 20 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

According to the World Health Organization, perinatal asphyxia is the leading cause of severe neurological disabilities and the second leading cause of neonatal death among term infants, with an incidence of 3.94-5.12 per 1,000 live births. Perinatal asphyxia leads to neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, which remains a common cause of neonatal death and long-term disabilities, affecting 1.5-3 per 1,000 live births in developed countries and up to 26 per 1,000 live births in developing countries. This condition is characterized by altered levels of consciousness or manifests with seizures, often associated with difficulties in initiating and maintaining breathing, as well as depression of tone and reflexes. Currently, therapeutic hypothermia is the standard treatment for neonates with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; however, it does not provide complete neuroprotection and is only partially effective. Therefore, new treatments with good therapeutic windows are urgently needed to ensure the best possible preservation of neurological tissue for patients exposed to hypoxic-ischemic insult. Traumatic brain injury is a common cause of morbidity and mortality among children and young adults in developed countries. The incidence of traumatic brain injury has increased in recent years, yet the prognosis for these patients has not substantially changed. In recent studies the key intermediary role of the immune system and neuroinflammation has been proposed to explain the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury, both in the acute phase and in the long term. Indeed, neuroinflammatory processes can persist for several months, contributing to chronic alterations and accelerating brain aging in patients with post-traumatic brain injury. Currently, therapies that have shown promising results in patients with post-traumatic brain injuries are unfortunately still limited, especially in the context of severe traumatic brain injury. Thus, there is an urgent need for new treatments with a broader therapeutic window that can counteract early and chronic pathophysiological events.

Read the detailed description

According to the World Health Organization, perinatal asphyxia is the leading cause of severe neurological disabilities and the second leading cause of neonatal death among term infants, with an incidence of 3.94-5.12 per 1,000 live births. Perinatal asphyxia leads to neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, which remains a common cause of neonatal death and long-term disability, affecting 1.5-3 per 1,000 live births in developed countries and up to 26 per 1,000 live births in developing countries. Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy represents a clinical syndrome characterized by neurological function disturbances in the early days of life for infants born after the 35th week of gestation. This condition is marked by altered consciousness levels or seizures, often associated with difficulties in initiating and maintaining breathing, as well as depression of tone and reflexes. There are many potential causes of neonatal encephalopathy, the most common being a hypoxic-ischemic insult. Other causes include infections, perinatal stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, congenital brain malformations, and metabolic and genetic syndromes. Neonatal hypoxia-ischemia is the most common cause of death and disability in newborns and is often associated with persistent motor, sensory, and cognitive deficits. The pathophysiology following neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury is complex and unfolds in several stages. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy evolves through distinct phases: after the initial hypoxic-ischemic event, there is an acute damage phase characterized by anaerobic metabolism, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, and necrosis of neuronal cells. This phase is followed by a latency period lasting 1-6 hours, marked by neuroinflammation and activation of apoptotic cascades. Within 6-15 hours, a secondary phase develops characterized by cytotoxic edema, excitotoxicity, and cerebral hyperperfusion. Finally, the last phase occurs in the weeks or months following the injury and involves delayed cell death and remodeling of the damaged brain. Currently, therapeutic hypothermia is the standard care for neonates with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Hypothermia involves cooling the entire body to an internal temperature of 33.5 °C for 72 hours within 6 hours of birth. Scientific evidence indicates that therapeutic hypothermia inhibits key steps in the excitotoxic-oxidative cascade. This therapy improves neurological outcomes at 18 months and at 6 years of age, reducing mortality from 25% to 9% and disability from 20% to 16%, and is now recommended as standard care. However, it does not provide complete neuroprotection and is only partially effective. Even after treatment, there remains a high prevalence of neurological morbidity and mortality affecting 40-50% of surviving neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. After hypothermia treatment, a significant percentage of neonates still develop long-term neurodisabilities. Therefore, it is essential to further optimize and enhance neonatal care. Additional neuroprotective interventions are currently being evaluated in randomized controlled trials, focusing on erythropoietin, allopurinol, topiramate, caffeine, melatonin, or stem cells. However, even experimental therapies have not yet proven effective in improving outcomes for these patients. Following hypoxic-ischemic injury, multiple pathophysiological events trigger secondary injuries. Therefore, the early blockade of these damage mechanisms could lead to a substantial long-term therapeutic effect. New treatments with good therapeutic windows are urgently needed to ensure the best possible preservation of neurological tissue for patients exposed to hypoxic-ischemic insult. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality among children and young adults in developed countries. The incidence of TBI has increased in recent years, but the prognosis for these patients has not changed substantially. Approximately 10% of patients with TBI present injuries that require hospitalization, and about 2% have fatal injuries. TBI occurs most frequently in very young children (ages 0 to 4) and in adolescents or young adults (ages 15 to 24), with a subsequent peak incidence in older adults. Post-traumatic brain injuries exhibit a complex pathophysiology, ranging from neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration to increased cerebral blood flow and blood-brain barrier permeability, leading to microvascular brain damage. Primary damage initiates a cascade of biochemical, metabolic, and inflammatory alterations that result in secondary damage associated with glutamatergic excitotoxicity, vascular dysfunction, calcium overload, and neuroinflammation. This primary injury rapidly triggers secondary injury that evolves over weeks or months. Recent studies have proposed the key role of immune system intermediaries and neuroinflammation to explain the pathophysiology of TBI, both acutely and long-term. Indeed, neuroinflammatory processes can persist for several months, thereby contributing to chronic alterations and an acceleration of brain aging in post-TBI patients. Currently, therapies that have shown promising results in patients with post-traumatic brain injuries are unfortunately still limited, especially in the management of severe TBI. Immediately after TBI, multiple pathophysiological events trigger the spread of secondary damage. Therefore, early blockade of one of the damage mechanisms could result in a substantial long-term therapeutic effect. New treatments with a broader therapeutic window are urgently needed to counteract early and chronic pathophysiological events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Injuries
  • Brain Ischemia
03

In context

Brain Injuries

946 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 100 across 302 observational studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 952 studies on the registry; 541 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 20 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients aged 0-20 years diagnosed with brain damage post-severe head trauma or post-perinatal asphyxia.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 0-20 years with brain damage due to severe traumatic brain injury or perinatal asphyxia evaluated at the Pediatric Emergency Department
  • signed by the parents, the adult patient, or the legal guardian/representative.
  • Adult patients with psycho-cognitive impairments that affect their ability to provide consent, with prior acquisition of informed consent from the guardian/legal representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to sign the
  • Patients with congenital malformations or genetic syndromes
  • Patients with neuromuscular diseases
  • Patients with encephalopathies of etiology other than severe head trauma or asphyxia
  • Patients with hemodynamically significant congenital heart diseases
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testGross Motor Function Classification System

    Clinical assessment of the outcome of patients with traumatic and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury at least 2 years post-event.

    Also known as: Modified Ashworth Scale, Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory generic core scale

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gross Motor Function Classification System

    Clinical assessment of the outcome of patients with traumatic and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury at least 2 years post-event, in terms of Analysis of motor deficits using the standardized scale "Gross Motor Function Classification System" where applicable. GMFCS is composed of 5 levels. Level I: Walks without limitations. Level V: Transported in a manual wheelchair.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Modified Ashworth Scale

    Clinical assessment of the outcome of patients with traumatic and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury at least 2 years post-event, in terms of Analysis of variations in muscle hypertonia and spasticity since the clinical event using the standardized scale "Modified Ashworth Scale" where applicable. Minimum Value: 0 This indicates no increase in muscle tone. Maximum Value: 4 This indicates that the affected part is rigid in flexion or extension.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Disability Rating Scale (DRS)

    Clinical assessment of the outcome of patients with traumatic and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury at least 2 years post-event, in terms of Analysis of the degree of disability using the standardized scale "Disability Rating Scale (DRS)" where applicable. Minimum value: 0 (indicates no disability). Maximum value: 30 (indicates an extreme vegetative state).

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory generic core scale

    Clinical assessment of the outcome of patients with traumatic and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury at least 2 years post-event, in terms of Analysis of quality of life through administration of the standardized scale "Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory generic core scale" to the patient and caregiver where applicable. The minimum possible score is 0. The maximum possible score is 100. Higher scores indicate a better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)

    Two years post-brain injury (traumatic or hypoxic-ischemic), the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) assesses child's functional abilities in self-care, mobility, and social function, including their reliance on assistive devices like feeding tubes. PEDI provides a detailed profile of the child's abilities across specific domains, rather than a single minimum or maximum score.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Modified Tardieu Scale

    This study clinically evaluates the long-term outcomes (at least two years post-event) of chronic pharmacological therapies for spasticity, measured by the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS), in patients with traumatic and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. The MTS differentiates neural (spasticity) from non-neural (contracture) limitations by assessing muscle resistance at varying stretch speeds. This is graded on a scale, typically from 0 to 5, reflecting the intensity of the muscle's reaction to a fast stretch.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Communication Function Classification System

    Two years post-brain injury, this study evaluates everyday communication abilities using the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS). CFCS ranges from Level V (severely limited communication) to Level I (highly effective communication), assessing individuals' ability to exchange information across various settings and with different people.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Pronto Soccorso Pediatrico
    Roma, Lazio 00168, Italy
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 143 non-industry observational studies under Brain Injuries, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 73. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 148 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 73.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 9, 2025
First posted
Mar 12, 2025
StartActual
Jan 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
Last update
Mar 12, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06873477
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 12, 2025
Start date
Jan 15, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 12, 2025

Study contacts

Antonio Chiaretti, Prof
Contact
antonio.chiaretti@policlinicogemelli.it
+390630155940
Antonio Chiaretti
principal investigator · Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion