ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06859411CORNEACOHORTUpdated Jun 24, 2026

Prognosis of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

An observational study in Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy and Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Over the past decade, the management of Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) has been revolutionized by the development of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques: DSAEK and DMEK.

DSAEK (Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty) involves replacing the patient's endothelium and pathological descemetum with a descemetic endothelial graft combined with a thin stromal lamella. The endothelial density of the grafts is generally greater than 2,400 cells/mm². Depending on the grafting center and tissue bank, grafts may be either pre-cut in the tissue bank or cut on the operating table by the surgeon himself.

The donor graft is placed on an artificial anterior chamber, and automated microkeratome cutting produces grafts with an average thickness of 100 to 200µm, sometimes less than 100um (known as UT-DSAEK or ultra-thin DSAEK).

DMEK (Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty) is a strictly endothelium and Descemet's membrane graft, as close as possible to the original anatomy of the cornea. The graft is dissected manually either in a tissue bank (pre-cut grafts) or on the operating table by the surgeon. The thickness of the graft is between 15 and 18 microns.

The primary objective of this observational cohort is to compare the evolution of visual acuity after DMEK, DSAEK or UT-DSAEK transplantation.

Secondary objectives are to compare the evolution of endothelial cell density, corneal thickness and early and late post-operative complications, and to identify factors predictive of these different endpoints.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
  • Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy

Keywords

  • posterior lamellar keratoplasty
  • cornea
  • DMEK
  • DSAEK
03

In context

Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy

92 studies on the registry are indexed under Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 144 across 26 observational studies indexed under Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy.

Browse Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients who received a posterior lamellar keratoplasty

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients who received a posterior lamellar keratoplasty in Metz-Thionville Regional Hospital between 2012 and 2030

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients refusing to take part in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • DMEK

    Patients who received Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

    Procedure: visual acuity comparaison

  • DSAEK

    Patients who received Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with preoperative graft thicker than 160 µm

    Procedure: visual acuity comparaison

  • UT-DSAEK

    DSAEK: patients who received Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with preoperative graft thinner than 160 µm

    Procedure: visual acuity comparaison

Interventions

  • Procedurevisual acuity comparaison

    Data collection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. BSCVA

    best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (logMAR)

    Time frame: at 1 year after surgery, but also at day 8, day 15, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and every year up to 10 years after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. ECD

    endothelial cell count (cells/mm²)

    Time frame: at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and every year up to 10 years after surgery

  2. CCT

    central cornea thickness (µm)

    Time frame: at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and every year up to 10 years after surgery

  3. post-operative complication

    graft reject (yes/no), graft detachment (yes/no), graft failure (yes/no), eye infection (yes/no)

    Time frame: up to 10 years after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Delean S, Goetz C, Zevering Y, Perone JM. Central Corneal Thickness 6 Postoperative Months After Pseudophakic-Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty, Triple-Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty, and Cataract Surgery Alone: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review. Cornea. 2026 Mar 11. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000004144. Online ahead of print. PubMed 41921039 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No According to French law and the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL), the investigators will not be able to publicly share individual participant data; however, the investigators plan to share the conclusions through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2040, 187 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 28, 2025
First posted
Mar 5, 2025
StartActual
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2040
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2040
Last update
Jun 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06859411
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 5, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2040 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2040 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Arpiné EL NAR, PhD
Contact
projet-recherche-clinique@chr-metz-thionville.fr
0033387557766
Jean-Marc PERONE, MD
principal investigator · CHR Metz Thionville Hopital de Mercy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion