ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07435389VESPA-2Updated Sep 25, 2026

VENTILATION DURING SPACEFLIGHT (PHASE 2)

An interventional study of non-invasive oxygenation strategies in Non-invasive Ventilation, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Updated Sep 25, 2026Start date movedPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Space flights expose astronauts to medical risks, particularly respiratory risks, which are exacerbated in microgravity. Devices such as standard oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) are used, but their performance in microgravity remains poorly studied. Parabolic flights allow these technologies to be evaluated in conditions similar to those encountered during space missions. In an initial study conducted in microgravity during a parabolic flight campaign, the T1 ventilator proved superior to the other devices tested on the test bench. However, its performance in healthy volunteers has not yet been evaluated. The central hypothesis of this exploratory study on healthy volunteers is that non-invasive ventilation, particularly with the CaStar UP helmet (Intersurgical), could offer superior performance to the standard oxygen mask in microgravity, thanks to better leak reduction (data from preclinical work on a test bench).

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-invasive Ventilation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy volunteers (male or female)
  • Aged 18 to 65
  • Affiliated with a Social Security scheme and, for non-French residents, holders of a European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) or a Global Health Insurance Card (GHIC)
  • Agreeing to participate in the study
  • Agreeing to participate in the study
  • Having given their in writing
  • Who have undergone a medical examination similar to a standard aeronautical medical examination for private pilot fitness

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who have participated in a previous biomedical research protocol
  • whose exclusion period has not ended.
  • Individuals in a subordinate relationship with the principal investigator or scientific director.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women (urine pregnancy test for women of childbearing age).
  • Protected adults (under guardianship, curatorship, or judicial protection)
  • Flu-like symptoms, digestive symptoms (nausea, vomiting), fever.
  • Altered mental state (flight-related anxiety, phobic state).
  • Failure to attend the Novespace safety briefing.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ABC

    A. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and BiTrac mask B. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and CaStar UP helmet (Intersurgical) C. Standard oxygen therapy without EcoLite gas mask

    Device: non-invasive oxygenation strategies

  • Experimental
    ACB

    A. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and BiTrac mask C. Standard oxygen therapy without EcoLite gas mask B. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and CaStar UP helmet (Intersurgical)

    Device: non-invasive oxygenation strategies

  • Experimental
    BAC

    B. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and CaStar UP helmet (Intersurgical) A . Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and BiTrac mask C. Standard oxygen therapy without EcoLite gas mask

    Device: non-invasive oxygenation strategies

  • Experimental
    BCA

    B. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and CaStar UP helmet (Intersurgical) C. Standard oxygen therapy without EcoLite gas mask A. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and BiTrac mask

    Device: non-invasive oxygenation strategies

  • Experimental
    CAB

    C. Standard oxygen therapy without EcoLite gas mask A. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and BiTrac mask B. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and CaStar UP helmet (Intersurgical)

    Device: non-invasive oxygenation strategies

  • Experimental
    CBA

    C. Standard oxygen therapy without EcoLite gas mask B. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and CaStar UP helmet (Intersurgical) A. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and BiTrac mask

    Device: non-invasive oxygenation strategies

Interventions

  • Devicenon-invasive oxygenation strategies

    A. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and BiTrac mask (Intersurgical): specific settings (AI 10 cmH2O, PEEP 5 cmH2O, FiO2 21%, etc.). B. Non-invasive ventilation with T1 ventilator (Hamilton) and CaStar UP helmet (Intersurgical): specific settings (AI 10 cmH2O, PEEP 5 cmH2O, FiO2 21%, etc.). C. Standard oxygen therapy without EcoLite gas mask (Intersurgical)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Expiratory tidal volume

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1. Average difference between the inspiratory assistance/PEP and the pressure

    Measured by the pneumotachograph during the last 5 respiratory cycles of the 22-second weightlessness phase

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. 2. Number of double triggers and intra-cycle efforts

    during the last 5 respiratory cycles of the 22-second weightlessness phase, as observed when reading the curves on the pneumotachograph

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. 3. Average change in the "Lung volume" parameter, measured noninvasively by thoracic electrical impedance tomography (EIT)

    During the last 5 respiratory cycles of the 22-second weightlessness phase

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. 4. Self-assessment scale for dyspnea on a scale of 1 to 10

    To be evaluated at the end of the 22-second run (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)) 0 = no dyspnea 10 = maximum imaginable dyspnea

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. 5. CO₂-inspired tidal volume and average transcutaneous CO₂ saturation (PETCO₂)

    over the last 5 respiratory cycles during the 22-second weightlessness phase, as measured by a capnostat and by transcutaneous CO₂ measurement

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. 6. Occurrence of an adverse event: PETCO2 > 50 mmHg

    dyspnea score \> 8/10, or nausea (yes/no on questioning)

    Time frame: 48 hours

  7. 7.The average respiratory

    Rate over the last 5 respiratory cycles during the 22-second weightless phase.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Sep 16, 2026→Oct 6, 2026
Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2026→Oct 10, 2026
Sep 25, 2026
Study completion
Sep 20, 2026→Oct 10, 2026
Sep 25, 2026
Secondary outcomes
7 added
What changed in the outcomes
  • Added1. Average difference between the inspiratory assistance/PEP and the pressureTime frame: 24 hours
  • Added2. Number of double triggers and intra-cycle effortsTime frame: 24 hours
  • Added3. Average change in the "Lung volume" parameter, measured noninvasively by thoracic electrical impedance tomography (EIT)Time frame: 24 hours
  • Added4. Self-assessment scale for dyspnea on a scale of 1 to 10Time frame: 24 hours
  • Added5. CO₂-inspired tidal volume and average transcutaneous CO₂ saturation (PETCO₂)Time frame: 24 hours
  • Added6. Occurrence of an adverse event: PETCO2 > 50 mmHgTime frame: 48 hours
  • Added7.The average respiratoryTime frame: 24 hours
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Start date Sep 16, 2026→Oct 6, 2026
    Primary completion Sep 20, 2026→Oct 10, 2026
    Study completion Sep 20, 2026→Oct 10, 2026
    Secondary outcomes 7 added
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Added1. Average difference between the inspiratory assistance/PEP and the pressureTime frame: 24 hours
    • Added2. Number of double triggers and intra-cycle effortsTime frame: 24 hours
    • Added3. Average change in the "Lung volume" parameter, measured noninvasively by thoracic electrical impedance tomography (EIT)Time frame: 24 hours
    • Added4. Self-assessment scale for dyspnea on a scale of 1 to 10Time frame: 24 hours
    • Added5. CO₂-inspired tidal volume and average transcutaneous CO₂ saturation (PETCO₂)Time frame: 24 hours
    • Added6. Occurrence of an adverse event: PETCO2 > 50 mmHgTime frame: 48 hours
    • Added7.The average respiratoryTime frame: 24 hours
    + 2 other changes: verification date and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07435389
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
Start date
Oct 6, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 10, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 10, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Andreia CARVALHO DE FREITAS
Contact
projet-recherche-clinique@chr-metz-thionville.fr
0033387553323

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion