ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06857084RePaReUpdated Jun 1, 2026

Evaluation Of Outcomes Following Rotator Cuff Repair Using the REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant

An observational study in Rotator Cuff Injuries, sponsored by Smith & Nephew, Inc.. Recruiting at 22 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-01.

Sponsored by Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2020; still recruiting 6 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 15 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in United Kingdom — 6 open to participants now, 7 under way, none of them phase 3. Rotator Cuff Injuries · United Kingdom.

Started
2020
with 2 others
Observational
5 of 15
4 open now
Registered
15th of 15
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 15
Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Among the 15 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in United Kingdom, this one is one of 3 that started in 2020, is one of 5 observational ones, and was the 15th registered.

By phase

15 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phase9 · 1 open
Observationalthis study5 · 4 open
Phase 41 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2007; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2020.

Size and results

Median enrollment 57 across the 10 interventional studies, 250 across the 5 observational. Of the 6 that completed or were terminated, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 15 studies in Rotator Cuff Injuries with a site in United Kingdom, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This prospective, single-arm, multicenter registry is being conducted to collect real world post-market data from patients who are undergoing rotator cuff repair using the REGENETEN◊ Bioinductive Implant System. The Registry will include up to 50 centers in the United Kingdom (UK), Europe, Australia, and up to 400 patients for the initial evaluation.

Patients will be treated and evaluated according to standard medical care. Outcome data is collected up to 2 years post-surgery.

03

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Injuries

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Rotator Cuff Repair
  • Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Full Thickness Tear
  • Partial Thickness Tear
  • Massive Tear
  • REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Orthopaedic Clinics/practices

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject requires Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR);
  • Patients aged over 18 years old at the time of consent and providing baseline data before undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery (either partial or full thickness tears) will be eligible for this prospective registry.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject who, in the opinion of the Investigator, has an emotional or neurological condition that would pre-empt their ability or willingness to participate in the registry including mental illness, intellectual disability, and drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Subjects who do not meet the indication or are according to specific Smith+Nephew REGENETEN System's Instructions for Use (IFUs);
  • Subject that meets the definition of a Vulnerable Subject per ISO14155:2020 Section 3.44.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
7 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Rotator cuff repair using REGENETEN

    Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant

    Device: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant augmentation

Interventions

  • DeviceArthroscopic rotator cuff repair with REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant augmentation

    Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair aims at repairing the rotator cuff following tendon tear. The REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant is a medical device intended for the management and protection of tendon injuries. The REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant is indicated for the management and protection of rotator cuff tendon injuries in which there has been no substantial loss of tendon tissue.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score

    The descriptive system is used to describe the subject's health state \& consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels to choose the most appropriate answer: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The subject is asked to indicate his/her health state by marking the most appropriate statement in each of the five areas. Responses are coded as single-digit numbers expressing the severity level selected in each dimension. For instance, 'slight problems' (e.g. 'I have slight problems in walking about') is always coded as '2'. The digits for the 5 dimensions are combined in a 5-digit code. The EQ- 5D-5L index value is derived by using the vendor supplied calculator to convert each 5-digit EQ-5D-5L profile. A higher number is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

  2. Quick DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Score

    Quick DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) is designed to measure physical function and symptoms. It assesses 11 items, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates no disability (i.e., better outcome) and 100 indicates most severe disability (i.e., worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

  3. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)

    The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a questionnaire for the assessment of outcomes of shoulder surgery, which can reduce the observer's errors in the evaluation. It contains 12- item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures specifically designed and developed for assessing outcomes of shoulder surgery such as assessing the impact on patients' quality of life of degenerative conditions (e.g., arthritis and rotator cuff problems). The OSS consists of 12 questions each scored 0 to 4 (0=unbearable, 1=severe, 2=moderate, 3=mild, 4=none) with 4 representing the best outcome. When the 12 items are summed, this produces overall scores that run from 0 to 48, with zero (0) representing a severe shoulder problem and 48 representing no related problem. Higher scores represent better clinical outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

  4. Pain, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

    Pain is assessed on a 100-point scale ranging from 0 to 100, with zero (0) representing no pain and 100 representing the worst pain imaginable

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

  5. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score

    The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a simple but effective measure where patients rate their shoulder condition as a percentage (0-100%), where 100% being completely normal and 0% being the worst condition imaginable.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Retear Rate

    Cumulative 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months retear rate. Failure is defined as Sugaya Type IV or V retear/recurrence (full-thickness discontinuity seen on both coronal and oblique sagittal MRI images).

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months

  2. Post-operative Recovery: Sling Type and Mobilization Time

    The type of sling will be collected and presented for each treatment arm summarizing if standard sling, shoulder immobilizer, abduction sling, ER sling, or other were advised. Mobilization time will be calculated for both arms.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  3. Post-operative Recovery: Return to Work

    Return to work questionnaires are collected at baseline and at 6 months post-op. At baseline, information on working arrangements are established: * Occupation status: Full time/part time/ retired * Occupation type: Sedentary/labor intensive * Impact of their diagnosis on their work performance: negative impact/no change At 6 months, information on changes to working arrangements is established: * Changes to occupation status * Returned to work and at what level: not returned due to procedure, not returned for other reasons, retired, lower level, same level, higher level * Time taken to return to work in days/weeks/months (if applicable)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

07

Study locations

21 of 22 sites recruiting
  • Melbourne Orthopaedic Group
    Windsor, Victoria 3181, Australia
    Recruiting
    • Shane Barwood · Contactshane@barwood.net.au · +61 (0)3 9525 1035
    • Shane Barwood · Principal investigator
  • Schoen Klinik Lorsch
    Lorsch, Rhine 64653, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Schoen Klinik Dusseldorf
    Düsseldorf, 40549, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Malteser Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Sporthopaedie Heidelberg
    Heidelberg, 69121, Germany
    Recruiting
  • St. Anna Hospital
    Herne, 44649, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Artemed Klinikum München Süd
    München, 81379, Germany
    Recruiting
  • OrthoMedicum Mittelhessen
    Stadtallendorf, 35260, Germany
    Recruiting
  • Regional General Hospital F. Miulli
    Acquaviva delle Fonti, Apulia 70021, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Anna De Luca · Contacta.deluca@miulli.it · +39 080 3054111
    • Raffaele Garofalo · Principal investigator
  • Ospedale Israelitico
    Roma, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Ospedale di Sassuolo
    Sassuolo, 41049, Italy
    Recruiting
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, Greater Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Spire Harpenden Hospital
    Harpenden, Hertordshire AL5 4BP, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Spire Montefiore
    Brighton, Hove BN3 1RD, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Cameron Hatrick · Contactcameron.hatrick@nhs.net · +44 (0) 127 392 0229
    • Cameron Hatrick · Principal investigator
  • Burnley General Hospital
    Burnley, Lancashire BB10 2PQ, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Burnley General Teaching Hospital
    Burnley, Lancashire BB10 2PQ, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, Lancashire M23 9LT, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Grantham and District Hospital
    Grantham, Lincolnshire NG31 8DG, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • University College London Hospitals
    London, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic London Hospital
    London, London SW1X 7HY, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Philip Ahrens · Contactpahrens@doctors.org.uk · +44 (0)20 3423 7500
    • Philip Ahrens · Principal investigator
  • Sulis Hospital Bath
    Bath, Somerset BA2 8SF, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust
    Hertford, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2029, 110 months after the start.

Of 72 observational studies under Rotator Cuff Injuries, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 165. This study's planned 110 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 26, 2025
First posted
Mar 4, 2025
StartActual
Oct 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
Last update
Jun 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06857084
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 1, 2026

Study contacts

Cat Whittall
Contact
catherine.whittall@smith-nephew.com
+44 7841868997
Tim Styche
Contact
Tim.Styche@smith-nephew.com
+44 7778 321835
Peter Lynch
study director · Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion