An interventional study of Percutaneous tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) and Ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of the suprascapular nerve in Rotator Cuff Tear and Pain Management, sponsored by Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.
Sponsored by Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Rotator cuff tears are among the most common direct and indirect causes of chronic shoulder pain. Patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears face a choice of pain management options. The principal treatments available for chronic shoulder pain associated with irreparable rotator cuff tears include arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon, shoulder arthroplasty, pharmacological treatment, and radiofrequency ablation of the suprascapular nerve.
Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon is an established treatment for pain associated with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, as supported by the available literature.
Radiofrequency ablation of the suprascapular nerve provides temporary pain control by destroying the sensory nerve fibres supplying the shoulder joint.
Tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon can be performed safely using a minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided outpatient procedure under local anaesthesia, without the general anaesthesia required for arthroscopy.
The aim of the study is to compare the reduction in pain intensity and the duration of analgesia following percutaneous tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon versus continuous radiofrequency ablation of the suprascapular nerve. Changes in shoulder mobility limitations following the two procedures will also be compared using the Constant-Murley score, which assesses shoulder function.
Recruitment Participants will be recruited from patients attending the CMKP Pain Clinic who have been diagnosed with an inoperable rotator cuff tear. During their pain clinic visit, patients will receive information about the study and an informed consent form for participation in the clinical study. They will have the opportunity to ask questions and will receive comprehensive answers.
Randomisation and blinding
Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Randomisation will be performed using www.randomizer.org, with equal numbers of participants allocated to the two groups.
Blinding will be achieved by placing the randomisation number on the envelope containing the study documents. The research team member who assesses pain intensity and the Constant-Murley score before and after the procedure will not be involved in performing the procedures and will be unaware of the patient's group allocation.
Patient data will be recorded in a database protected against access by third parties. The data will include demographic and clinical characteristics (age, height, body weight, comorbidities, substance use, and analgesic doses), as well as procedural details (the selected technique and procedure duration).
Procedural management Percutaneous tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon LHBT
Assessment of pain and quality of recovery Pain intensity will be assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) at predefined time points.
Range of motion and quality of recovery will be assessed using the validated Polish version of the Constant-Murley score at predefined time points.
6. Assessment time points Patients will be assessed before the procedure and at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure, using the NRS and the Constant-Murley score.
Assessment schedule: baseline (0 months), 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months. 7. Statistical analysis The collected data will be analysed using statistical methods appropriate for continuous and categorical variables. The distribution of continuous variables will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test and graphical methods. Data will be presented as the mean ± standard deviation or the median and interquartile range, depending on their distribution. The primary analysis of the efficacy of the two interventions will use repeated measurements of the Constant-Murley score and NRS obtained before the procedure and at 1, 6, and 12 months. A linear mixed-effects model for repeated measurements will be fitted, including group, time, and the group × time interaction. If the assumptions for parametric analyses are not met, appropriate non-parametric methods will be used. Statistical significance will be defined as p \< 0.05.
The sample size was estimated for the primary endpoint, namely the between-group difference in the Constant-Murley score. Assuming a clinically important difference of 10 points, a significance level of α = 0.05, 80% power, a standard deviation of 15 points, and a potential loss to follow-up of 10%, the planned enrolment is 30 patients per group, for a total of 60 patients.
745 studies on the registry are indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries; 163 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 547 interventional studies indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries.
Browse Rotator Cuff Injuries studies →Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) sheath.
Procedure: Percutaneous tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT)
Ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of the suprascapular nerve
Procedure: Ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of the suprascapular nerve
Under continuous ultrasound guidance, the 18 G needle will be inserted into the LHBT sheath, where the local anaesthetic will be administered. The LHBT will then undergo repeated needle fenestration until tendon transection is visible or can be felt. LHBT continuity will be reassessed using ultrasound.
Under ultrasound guidance, a radiofrequency ablation needle with a 10 mm active tip will be advanced to the anatomical location of the nerve. Sensory and motor stimulation will be performed to confirm that the needle tip is immediately adjacent to the nerve. Radiofrequency ablation will be performed at 80 °C for 60 seconds.
Constant-Murley score at 1 month
Shoulder function assessed with Constant-Murley score, a 100-point clinical scoring system used to evaluate overall shoulder function, where 100 points indicate best possible function and outcome and 0 stands for the worst possible function and outcome.
Time frame: 1 month
Constant-Murley score at 6 months
Shoulder function assessed with Constant-Murley score, a 100-point clinical scoring system used to evaluate overall shoulder function, where 100 points indicate best possible function and outcome and 0 stands for the worst possible function and outcome.
Time frame: 6 months
Constant-Murley score at 12 months
Shoulder function assessed with Constant-Murley score, a 100-point clinical scoring system used to evaluate overall shoulder function, where 100 points indicate best possible function and outcome and 0 stands for the worst possible function and outcome.
Time frame: 12 months
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 1 month
Pain intensity reported as Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, 0 - 10 points, where 0 points indicates no pain and 10 points stands for worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: 1 month
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 6 months
Pain intensity reported as Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, 0 - 10 points, where 0 points indicates no pain and 10 points stands for worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: 6 months
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 months
Pain intensity reported as Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, 0 - 10 points, where 0 points indicates no pain and 10 points stands for worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: 12 months
Change in NRS at 1 month
The difference between baseline (pre-procedure) pain intensity and pain intensity 1 month following the procedure, reported as Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores, where 0 points indicates no pain and 10 points stands for worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: 1 month
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided — I will identify and set the account for the study at one of the IPD repositories
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2028, 24 months later.
Of 284 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Rotator Cuff Injuries, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 24 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 306 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education