ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06846749F50Updated Apr 24, 2026

Slow Introduction of Nutrition for Ill Malnourished Children

A Phase 1 interventional study of F75 milk feeds and F50 milk feeds in Malnutrition, Severe Acute, Malnutrition, Child and Malnutrition, Infant, sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 59 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-24.

Sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
135
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 59 Months
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 11 studies in Severe Acute Malnutrition with a site in Bangladesh — 3 open to participants now, 4 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Severe Acute Malnutrition · Bangladesh.

Planned enrollment
7th of 10
135 · median 240
Started
2025
the only one that year
Phase 1
Only one
of the 11
Registered
10th of 11
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 11
The Hospital for Sick Children

Among the 11 studies in Severe Acute Malnutrition with a site in Bangladesh, this one is the 7th largest by planned enrollment of the 10 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2025, is the only one in phase 1, and was the 10th registered.

Severe Acute Malnutrition

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Severe Acute Malnutrition; 11 are open to participants now.

Browse Severe Acute Malnutrition studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 11 studies in Severe Acute Malnutrition with a site in Bangladesh are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 3 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Bangladesh have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Bangladesh →

Who these studies take

Of the 7 Severe Acute Malnutrition studies recruiting now, none set no upper age limit and 7 stop at 75 or younger; 7 take children under 18; 3 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 6 Months to 59 Months · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in Severe Acute Malnutrition with a site in Bangladesh, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if giving lower calorie feeds during the first stage of treatment helps improve survival in severely malnourished children who are ill. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is it safe to feed ill severely malnourished children lower calorie feeds during the early treatment phase?

Researchers will compare two lower calorie feeds (F50 and F35) to the standard feed (F75) to see if they help children recover safely without increasing their risk of low blood sugar (hypoglycemia).

Participants will:

  • Receive one of the lower calorie feeds (F50 or F35) or the standard feed (F75) during their hospital stay.
  • Be closely monitored for low blood sugar and signs for worsening of clinical symptoms.
  • Be treated until they are stable and ready to be fed more calories to help them gain weight.
Read the detailed description

Malnutrition is a leading cause of death, contributing to nearly 45% of all deaths in children under the age of 5 years worldwide. In its most severe form, severe malnutrition remains prevalent globally affecting more than 45 million children. Severely malnourished children have a strongly increased risk of death from common infectious diseases. Updates in treatment protocols for severe malnutrition have been the most impactful intervention against childhood mortality.

Management of severely malnourished children hospitalized with critical illness is based on guidelines developed by the World Health Organization and consists of three main components: 1. Clinical stabilization 2. Treatment of underlying infections 3. Nutritional rehabilitation. Clinical stabilization includes administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, fluid resuscitation (if needed) and providing a nutritional stabilization feed that is called 'F75'. F75 was designed in the 1990's assuming that severely malnourished children with infections are metabolically vulnerable and have a range of micronutrient disturbances. F75 aims to provide 95 kcal/kg/day and was not intended for weight gain since, during this initial period, children are actively fighting infections. Once clinically stabilized, on average after 3-5 days, children are transitioned from F75 to ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) that provide a substantially higher amount of protein and calories to promote rapid weight gain. Some children fail this transition and have to revert back to F75 for a period of time due to clinical deterioration or not tolerating the RUTF. Despite protocolized management of these highly vulnerable patients, mortality rates have remained high over the past decades and reported to range between 10-30%, depending on population, setting and duration of follow up.

Scientific evidence from the last decade has started to reform the approach to care for critically ill children in relation to feeding. Evidence shows that, during severe infection, the body enters a catabolic state, which is critical for immune function and pathogen clearance. Overfeeding during this phase may disrupt essential metabolic processes, including a process of cellular recycling called autophagy, which play a key role in fighting infections. Studies in both high- and low-resource settings have shown that limiting caloric intake in the early days of critical illness may improve clinical outcomes, including reducing the risk of infections and decreasing ICU stay durations.

No clinical trial has examined the optimal caloric intake for ill severely malnourished children in LMIC and the current F75 composition was only based on expert opinion. Our population and treatment settings are substantially different compared to high income settings. Children in LMIC are often wasted to a degree of severity not frequently observed in high resource settings. Severely malnourished children are thought to be at risk of refeeding syndrome, defined as an acute insulin response to rapid refeeding leading to electrolyte imbalances and hypoglycemia. In many LMIC, health resources are scarce and physician and nurse to patient ratios are low. Malnourished children are therefore managed using relatively protocolized but largely non-evidence-based approaches. This has led the World Health Organization (WHO) to press the scientific community to review of current practices. Intravenous fluid administration is often avoided due to the absence of fluid solutions, infusion pumps and lack of resources to monitor fluid intake. Parenteral nutrition is generally not available. Therefore, fluid and nutrition are mainly provided orally or through a nasogastric tube.

We aim to test the safety and tolerability of using lower caloric feeds during the initial clinical stabilization phase of acutely ill severely malnourished children. Reducing caloric intake has been shown to improve clinical outcomes of critically ill children with malnutrition in high resource setting. We propose that applying a similar strategy during the initial stabilization phase will improve survival of critically ill children with malnutrition in low resource settings. However, reducing caloric intake in these children may increase the risk of hypoglycemia. Therefore, we will conduct a randomized phase I clinical trial specifically designed to assess and minimize this risk. The potential benefits on childhood survival renders this trial ethically and clinically justified. Given current data, the use of lower caloric feeds should be evaluated in this vulnerable population. Conducting this safety phase-I trial will be a critical step before proceeding with an efficacy-focused trial powered for mortality.

The F50 and F35 feeds have been meticulously formulated for this trial. Their composition is identical to that of F75, with the only distinction being the reduction in calorie content with F50 aiming to provide 63kcal/kg/day and F35 aiming to provide 47kcal/kg/day. This ensures that the nutritional parameters and essential components remain consistent, while the lower calorie count aligns with the specific requirements of this trial. Once clinically stabilized, on average after 3-5 days, children are transitioned from F50 or F35 to RUTF that provide substantially higher amounts of protein and calories to promote rapid weight gain. This novel trial design will be used to ensure the highest level of safety. Once the optimal and safe reduction in calories is determined, we would be able to perform a large intervention trial whereby the provided feeds (i.e., standard F75 or a reduced calorie feed) can be randomized and tested for efficacy in reducing mortality. This work has the potential to radically change how we manage seriously ill severely malnourished children and reduce the mortality in the most vulnerable children globally.

03

Conditions studied

  • Malnutrition, Severe Acute
  • Malnutrition, Child
  • Malnutrition, Infant

Keywords

  • Overfeeding, Refeeding syndrome, Glucose Dysregulation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 59 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age - greater than or equal to 6 months to less than 59 months (age range for which WHO guidelines were developed and where children are not expected to be exclusively breastfeeding
  • Admitted to hospital with acute, non-traumatic illness and having received a maximum of 2 feeds of F75 at time of enrolment
  • Severe malnutrition (WHZ \<-3 z-scores of the median WHO growth standards and/or MUAC \<115mm)
  • Accompanied by care provider able to provide written or witnessed
  • Primary caregiver plans to stay in the study area for the duration of the study
  • Having no more than one clinical sign displayed below "Clinical/Lab Feature \& Criteria"

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has oedematous malnutrition (excluded for this safety focused trial as fluid accumulation influences weight which is used to calculate required caloric intake)
  • Requires immediate cardiac/respiratory resuscitation (chest compressions/ventilation)
  • Clinical for enteral nutrition
  • Admission for traumatic or surgical indication
  • Weighs \<3.5kg
  • Presence of terminal illness likely to result in death within 6 months
  • Known congenital heart disease
  • Have had 2 documented hypoglycaemic events in hospital
  • More than one clinical sign displayed below "Clinical/Lab Feature \& Criteria"
  • Primary caregiver declines to provide

Clinical/Lab Feature \& Criteria Guidelines

Clinical/Lab Feature: Respiratory distress Oxygenation Criteria: "Subcostal in-drawing" or "nasal flaring" or "head-nodding"

Clinical/Lab Feature: Oxygenation Criteria: "Central cyanosis" or SaO2 \<90%

Clinical/Lab Feature: Circulation Criteria: Limb temperature gradient or capillary refill >3 seconds

Clinical/Lab Feature: Reduced conscious level Criteria: AVPU \< "A"

Clinical/Lab Feature: Rapid pulse Criteria: Heartbeat per min > 180

Clinical/Lab Feature: Severe anemia Criteria: \< 7g/dl

Clinical/Lab Feature: Hypoglycemia Criteria: Blood glucose \< 3mmol/L

Clinical/Lab Feature: Abnormal temperature Criteria: Axial temperature \<36 or >38oC

Clinical/Lab Feature: Very low MUAC Criteria: MUAC \<11cm

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
135 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    F75 milk feeds

    F-75 nutritional stabilization feed was designed in the 1990s assuming that severely malnourished children with infections are metabolically vulnerable and have a range of micronutrient disturbances. F75 aims to provide 95 kcal/kg/day and was intended to support children through early stabilization when fighting infections and not aimed at weight gain. Once clinically stabilized, on average after 3-5 days, children are transitioned from F75 to ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) that provide substantially higher amount of protein and calories to promote rapid weight gain.

    Dietary Supplement: F75 milk feeds

  • Experimental
    F50 milk feeds

    The F50 feed has been meticulously formulated by Nutriset. The composition is identical to that of F75, with the only distinction being the reduction in calorie content with F50 aiming to provide 63kcal/kg/day. This ensures that the nutritional parameters and essential components remain consistent, while the lower calorie count aligns with the specific requirements of this trial. Once clinically stabilized, on average after 3-5 days, children are transitioned from F50 to RUTF that provide substantially higher amounts of protein and calories to promote rapid weight gain.

    Dietary Supplement: F50 milk feeds

  • Experimental
    F35 milk feeds

    The F35 feed has been meticulously formulated by Nutriset. Their composition is identical to that of F75, with the only distinction being the reduction in calorie content with F35 aiming to provide 47kcal/kg/day. This ensures that the nutritional parameters and essential components remain consistent, while the lower calorie count aligns with the specific requirements of this trial. Once clinically stabilized, on average after 3-5 days, children are transitioned from F35 to RUTF that provide substantially higher amounts of protein and calories to promote rapid weight gain.

    Dietary Supplement: F35 milk feeds

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementF75 milk feeds

    Standard 'F75' (75 kcal/100 ml) 95 kcal/kg/day 12.05 mg/kg/min glucose

    Also known as: Therapeutic Milk

  • Dietary supplementF50 milk feeds

    Reduced caloric 'F50' (50kcal/100ml) 63 kcal/kg/day 8.03mg/kg/min glucose

    Also known as: Therapeutic Milk

  • Dietary supplementF35 milk feeds

    Reduced caloric 'F35' (35 kcal/100ml) * 47 kcal/kg/day * 5.62 mg/kg/min glucose

    Also known as: Therapeutic Milk

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Episodes of moderate hypoglycemia

    The occurrence of at least one episode of moderate hypoglycemia (less than or equal to 3.0 mmol/l) during the stabilization phase as measured utilizing the Dexcom Continous Glucose Monitoring Device and/or bed-side glucometer (OneTouch).

    Time frame: During the period of F75/F50/F35 provision meaning the stabilization phase which is on average 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Serious Adverse Events

    The number of severe adverse events between the intervention (F50 and F35) and control (F75) arms. Diagnosis, date and time of onset, outcome severity and relation to the type of feed administration will be established within 24 hours and reported.

    Time frame: During the period of F75/F50/F35 provision meaning the stabilization phase, which is on average 3 days

  2. Episodes of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia

    The number of episodes of hypoglycemia (less than or equal to 3.0mmol/l) or hyperglycemia (greater than or equal to 10 mmol/l) and glycemic variability between the intervention (F50 and F35) and control (F75) arms. Measurements will be done utilizing the Dexcom Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device and/or bed-side glucometer (OneTouch).

    Time frame: During the period of F75/F50/F35 provision meaning the stabilization phase, which is on average 3 days

  3. Duration of the stabilization phase

    The duration of the stabilization phase in days - including when the child "failed to transition" between the intervention (F50 and F35) and control (F75) arms.

    Time frame: The duration of the stabilization phase which is expected to be on average 3 days following enrolment.

  4. Failed transition to ready-to-use-therapeutic foods (RUTF).

    Return to stabilization feed after attempting to introduce RUTF.

    Time frame: Transition phase expected to be on average 3 days following start of RUTF

  5. Duration of hospital stay

    Length of time spent in hospital for the duration of the study

    Time frame: Study enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 days

  6. Volume of feed consumed per day

    Compare the volume of feeds consumed per day in ml/kg body weight for the interventions (F50 and F35) and control (F75) arms.

    Time frame: During the period of the stabilization phase, which is on average 3 days

  7. Change in weight

    Change in weight from admission to clinical stabilization as determined by anthropometric measurements

    Time frame: Admission to clinical stabilization, which is on average 3 days

  8. Loose or watery stools

    The number of loose or watery stools per day, using the Bristol Stool Scale.

    Time frame: Study enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 days

  9. Vomiting episodes

    Number of vomiting episodes per day

    Time frame: Study enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 days

  10. Feeds withheld

    Number of feeds withheld from participant

    Time frame: During the period of the stabilization phase, which is on average 3 days

  11. New Infection

    New infection onset as defined by positive bacterial cultures

    Time frame: Study enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 days

  12. Mortality

    Mortality as a number and percentage during hospitalization.

    Time frame: Study enrolment to discharge, which is on average 7 days

Other outcomes

  1. Glucose response

    Pre and post prandial glucose response

    Time frame: The duration of the stabilization phase, which is on average 3 days

  2. C-reactive protein and white blood cell count and differential

    C-reactive protein and white blood cell count and differential at enrolment as a biochemical marker of infection severity

    Time frame: Enrolment

  3. Venous blood gas, lactate, electrolytes

    Venous blood gas, lactate, electrolytes at day 3 after hospital admission as a biochemical marker of illness severity and refeeding syndrome

    Time frame: Day 3 of admission

  4. Energy expenditure

    Energy expenditure using Indirect Calorimetry at enrolment and day 1 after discharge

    Time frame: Day 1 of admission and discharge, which is expected to be on average after 7 days

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fivez T, Kerklaan D, Mesotten D, Verbruggen S, Wouters PJ, Vanhorebeek I, Debaveye Y, Vlasselaers D, Desmet L, Casaer MP, Garcia Guerra G, Hanot J, Joffe A, Tibboel D, Joosten K, Van den Berghe G. Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Children. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 24;374(12):1111-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514762. Epub 2016 Mar 15. PubMed 26975590 ↗
  • Maitland K, Berkley JA, Shebbe M, Peshu N, English M, Newton CR. Children with severe malnutrition: can those at highest risk of death be identified with the WHO protocol? PLoS Med. 2006 Dec;3(12):e500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030500. PubMed 17194194 ↗
  • Kerac M, Bunn J, Seal A, Thindwa M, Tomkins A, Sadler K, Bahwere P, Collins S. Probiotics and prebiotics for severe acute malnutrition (PRONUT study): a double-blind efficacy randomised controlled trial in Malawi. Lancet. 2009 Jul 11;374(9684):136-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60884-9. PubMed 19595348 ↗
  • Hossain M, Chisti MJ, Hossain MI, Mahfuz M, Islam MM, Ahmed T. Efficacy of World Health Organization guideline in facility-based reduction of mortality in severely malnourished children from low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 May;53(5):474-479. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13443. Epub 2017 Jan 4. PubMed 28052519 ↗
  • Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaffey MF, Walker N, Horton S, Webb P, Lartey A, Black RE; Lancet Nutrition Interventions Review Group, the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost? Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):452-477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4. Epub 2013 Jun 6. PubMed 23746776 ↗
  • Bhutta ZA, Berkley JA, Bandsma RHJ, Kerac M, Trehan I, Briend A. Severe childhood malnutrition. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Sep 21;3:17067. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.67. PubMed 28933421 ↗
  • Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, de Onis M, Ezzati M, Grantham-McGregor S, Katz J, Martorell R, Uauy R; Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):427-451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X. Epub 2013 Jun 6. PubMed 23746772 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Only SAE's will be shared as individual participant data to the SAE review committee.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2026, 15 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 11, 2025
First posted
Feb 26, 2025
StartActual
Feb 5, 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Last update
Apr 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06846749
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, The Eleanor Crook Foundation, Children's Investment Fund Foundation, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
Responsible party
Robert Bandsma (Staff Physician, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2025
Start date
Feb 5, 2025
Primary completion
May 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion