CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06843785Updated Aug 14, 2026

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Squat Exercises in Healthy Individuals

An interventional study of Squat with knees over toes and Squat where the knee does not pass the toes in Balance; Distorted and Low Back Pain, sponsored by Uskudar University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-14.

Sponsored by Uskudar University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of our study is to compare the effects of two different squatting patterns, with and without the knees passing the toes, on low back pain, muscle strength and balance.

Read the detailed description

A total of 60 volunteer participants between the ages of 18-30, who are in the active category of the International Physical Activity Assessment Questionnaire Short Form, are planned to be included in the study. Individuals participating in the study will be divided into 3 groups using using unrestricted (simple) randomization. A random number was generated for each participant with the random-number functions of Microsoft Excel and participants were ordered by that number and assigned to the three groups. No blocking or stratification was used and no formal allocation-concealment mechanism (such as sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes) was implemented. Group I (n=20); squatting with the knees passing the toes (PI), Group II (n=20); squatting with the knees not passing the toes (PG) and Group III (n=20); control group (CG). Squatting with the knees passing the toes (PI); squatting with the knees not passing the toes (PG) will be applied to the study groups as a home program for 6 weeks and will be checked with an exercise diary. Participants will be re-evaluated at the end of the exercise program. No training program will be applied to the control group and they will be asked to continue their daily lives and participants will be evaluated at 6-week intervals. The training program of 1 set; 20 repetitions; 30 seconds active contraction/30 seconds rest is applied to the PI and PG groups 3 days a week, every other day for 6 weeks. The training program of the groups is monitored by a physiotherapist for 6 weeks via telerehabilitation technologies. All participants will be evaluated for back pain, knee pain, pressure pain threshold, low-back-related disability, self-reported knee function, dynamic balance, perceived exertion, and vertical-jump flight time, function and balance before and at the end of the program and the data obtained will be recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Balance; Distorted
  • Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 2,268 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Uskudar University is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being between the ages of 18-30,
  • According to International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form Being physically active
  • Not having any psychological, neurological, orthopedic and rheumatic disorders,
  • Not having a history of fractures or surgeries affecting the lower extremities in the last year,
  • Being able to do at least one traditional squat exercise
  • Being able to communicate in Turkish (written and verbal) Exclusion criteria
  • Being pregnant or suspected of being pregnant
  • Knee valgus diagnosis
  • Pes planus or pes cavus diagnosis in the foot
  • Hip rotation diagnosis
  • Strength deficit between two extremities
  • A physician-diagnosed painful knee condition of recent onset
  • Regular medication use or use of NSAIDs and similar disease-modifying drugs in the last month
  • Intra-articular injection (hyaluronic acid/steroid) application in the last 6 months
  • Having a comorbid disease that contraindicates exercise (advanced osteoporosis, vertigo, neurological diseases, etc.)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    knee past toes squat

    A squatting program with the desired characteristics will be applied

    Other: Squat with knees over toes

  • Active comparator
    control

    No Intervention

    Other: control

  • Experimental
    knee not past toes squat

    A squatting program with the desired characteristics will be applied

    Other: Squat where the knee does not pass the toes

Interventions

  • OtherSquat with knees over toes

    Participants are instructed to stand comfortably with feet pelvis-width apart and approximately 15-30° to the side with arms extended in front of them. Participants are asked to squat to their most comfortable point, looking straight ahead, without heels leaving the floor, and to hold the position for 2 seconds before returning to the original standing position. The distance between the hips and the floor is measured vertically using a ruler for squat depth. Three trials are performed and the average of the three trials is used for further analysis.

  • OtherSquat where the knee does not pass the toes

    In the limited squat exercise, the position of the most anterior part of the knee is not allowed to extend beyond the toes. In the limited squat exercise, a wooden board is placed just distal to the first toe of each foot, and the 60 cm wide wooden board restricts knee movement. Participants are instructed to stand comfortably with their feet pelvis-width apart and approximately 15-30° to the side, and their arms extended in front of them. Participants are asked to squat to 90° of knee flexion, looking straight ahead, without the heels leaving the floor, and to hold the position for 2 seconds, then return to the original standing position. Squat depth is determined by measuring 90° of knee flexion using a goniometer placed on the knee and measured vertically between the hip and the floor using a ruler. Three trials are performed, and the average of the three trials is used for further analysis.

  • Othercontrol

    Participants will not be subjected to any intervention and will not be asked to perform any action.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index

    It was developed to evaluate the degree of loss of function in low back pain. Items question pain severity, self-care, lifting and carrying loads, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, degree of pain change, travel and social life. Under each item there are six statements in which the patient ticks the one appropriate to his/her situation. The first statement is scored as "0" and the sixth statement is scored as "5". When the total score is calculated, it is multiplied by two and expressed as a percentage. The maximum score is "100" and the minimum score is "0". As the total score increases, the disability level also increases.

    Time frame: 6 weeks (baseline and immediately post-intervention)

  2. Y balance test

    The test is a practical functional test that can predict dynamic balance and postural stability. The player's performance improves with balance, flexibility, coordination and power integration. For this test, players stand in the center of a 'Y' shaped arrangement with 3 lines drawn at certain angles. The players are asked to reach in anterior, posterolateral and posteromedial directions using one foot. Three applications are made in each direction and the average of the reach distances is recorded in centimeters. Pre-measured leg length is used to normalize the mean score of these three treatments. Percentage of maximum reach = deflection distance/leg length. Leg length; Spina iliaca anterior superior to the distal point of the medial malleolus. To obtain an overall measure of the Y Balance Test, data from all directions must be averaged to calculate the composite score.

    Time frame: 6 weeks (baseline and immediately post-intervention)

  3. International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form

    This questionnaire is a standardized tool for measuring physical activity, developed by researchers from various countries with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Questionnaire, four areas of physical activity; It covers work, transportation, housework/gardening, and leisure activities, but also includes questions about time spent sitting as an indicator of inactivity. In each of the four areas, the energy expended in moderate and vigorous activities in the last 7 days, the number of days the activities were performed, and the number of activities performed during the day are recorded. The times are multiplied by the Metabolic Equivalent (MET) values per activity, and the results for all items are added to form the overall physical activity score. The question about sitting is not included in the physical activity score. Classification is made in three categories as physically inactive (3000 MET min/week).

    Time frame: 6 weeks (baseline and immediately post-intervention)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bahçeşehir Universtiy
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Slater LV, Hart JM. Muscle Activation Patterns During Different Squat Techniques. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Mar;31(3):667-676. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001323. PubMed 26808843 ↗
  • Desai I, Marshall PW. Acute effect of labile surfaces during core stability exercises in people with and without low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010 Dec;20(6):1155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.08.003. PubMed 20801670 ↗
  • Kararti C, Ozsoy I, Ozyurt F, Basat HC, Ozsoy G, Ozudogru A. The effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization approach on clinical outcomes in older patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Somatosens Mot Res. 2023 Sep;40(3):116-125. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2191705. Epub 2023 Mar 24. PubMed 36964655 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The anonymized participant-level dataset is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06843785
Lead sponsor
Uskudar University
Responsible party
Doç.Dr.Ömer Şevgin (Asst. Prof. Dr., Uskudar University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 25, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
May 1, 2025
Completion
May 15, 2025
Last update
Aug 14, 2026

Study contacts

Amirkiya Movahhedi
study chair · Bahçeşehir University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion