CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06827834MSpineUpdated Feb 14, 2025

Spinal Cord Monitoring in Multiple Sclerosis

An observational study in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum. Recruiting at 5 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-14.

Sponsored by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
155
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and the most common cause of non-traumatic neurological disability in young adults. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most important paraclinical investigation used in the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease. In the past years, spinal cord MRI has improved significantly and has become an important part of the diagnostic workup for MS. Presently, follow-up imaging of the spinal cord is only performed when spinal cord related symptoms occur. However, there is increasing evidence that asymptomatic spinal cord lesions can occur, independently of brain disease activity. Despite these cord lesions being asymptomatic, they impact disability accrual in the long term. Although this might be an imaging marker for monitoring and treatment, it is not yet applied in the clinical setting.

The investigators will prospectively collect spinal cord MRI data (in addition to routine brain MRI), and blood-based biomarkers (plus cerebral spinal fluid markers, if available), in recently diagnosed MS patients, to address the following research questions:

  • What is the incidence of asymptomatic spinal cord lesions in patients commencing DMT?
  • And in the absence of radiological progression on brain imaging, how frequently do asymptomatic spinal cord lesions occur? In other words, how often is disease activity solely proven by spinal cord MRI and what is the number-needed-to-scan?
  • A secondary objective is to investigate which patients are predisposed to developing new spinal cord lesions during follow-up in the early stages of the disease. For this question, factors such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profiles, B-cell composition in blood, soluble blood markers, and clinical features will be focused on.
Read the detailed description

The investigators aim to prospectively collect spinal cord MRI data (in addition to routine brain MRI), in recently diagnosed MS patients, to address the following research questions:

What is the incidence of asymptomatic spinal cord lesions in patients commencing DMT?

And in the absence of radiological progression on brain imaging, how frequently do asymptomatic spinal cord lesions occur? In other words, how often is disease activity solely proven by spinal cord MRI and what is the number-needed-to-scan?

  1. What is the incidence of asymptomatic spinal cord lesions in patients commencing DMT?
  2. In the absence of radiological progression on brain imaging, how frequently do asymptomatic spinal cord lesions occur? In other words, how often is disease activity solely proven by spinal cord MRI and what is the number-needed-to-scan?

Hypothesis: The hypothesis is that the detected incidence of asymptomatic cord lesions independent of brain MRI activity will be higher than the approximately 10% per year reported in retrospective studies.

A secondary objective is to investigate which patients are predisposed to developing new spinal cord lesions during follow-up in the early stages of the disease. For this question, factors such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profiles, B-cell composition in blood, soluble blood markers, and clinical features will be focused on.

  1. What subgroups are prone to new spinal cord lesions at follow-up in early disease? In particular:
  • Can disease activity on spinal cord MRI be predicted by baseline CSF profiles, i.e. is there an association between intrathecal IgM/IgG synthesis, number of oligoclonal bands and/or kappa free light chains at baseline and formation of new spinal cord lesions at follow-up?
  • Is there an association between low number of transitional B cells in blood at baseline and formation of new spinal cord lesions?
  • Is there an association between soluble blood markers and other blood biomarkers at baseline and formation of new spinal cord lesions at follow-up?
  • What subtype of clinical presentation or certain physical complaints are associated with new spinal cord lesions during follow-up?

Hypothesis: The hypothesis is that more new spinal cord lesions occur in patients with CSF profile positive for intrathecal IgM, IgG synthesis and higher number oligoclonal bands, a low number of transitional B cells at baseline, a low number of CD56bright NK cells, high levels of activating sICPs and low levels of inhibitory sICPs at baseline, and/or a presenting syndrome of optic neuritis or myelitis.

To investigate the research questions, MS patients will be enrolled from five Dutch MS centres in an observational study with a follow-up of 27 months. Patients will be asked to participate when they are being screened for DMT initiation and given 7 days to consider. Informed consent will be obtained by a doctor, part of the research team. Next to routine regular follow-up with brain MRI and outpatient clinic visits, patients will receive spinal cord MRI and a structured registration of clinical parameters and collection of blood samples. Towards the end of follow-up, it will be evaluated whether starting an extension study is of additional value.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • spinal cord
  • mri
  • biomarkers
  • multiple sclerosis
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 155 is above the median of 100 across 1,016 observational studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Zuyderland Medisch Centrum is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Population of treatment-naïve relapsing-remitting MS patients, early in the disease course (within 5 years of first clinical event) between 18 - 65 years old, where a first DMT is initiated.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between 18 and 65 years old
  • Patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (≤5 years of first clinical event)
  • Treatment-naïve patients starting (currently in the Netherlands approved) DMT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who presented first clinical event more than five years ago
  • Patients who have already started DMT
  • Patients who are incapable of giving informed consent
  • Patients who are unable to undergo local MRI scan, due to for instance
  • Physical problems, for instance due to size/obesity (not fitting in regular MRI scanner), not being able to lie flat for extended periods of time (e.g. due to pain, shortness of breath)
  • Due to claustrophobia
  • Patients who have contraindications for MRI scan, for instance
  • Due to MRI-unsafe or non-compatible implanted material/devices, such as pacemakers or ocular metal splinters
  • Patients who are pregnant at inclusion
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
155 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Spinal cord lesion count

    Time frame: 27 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Brain MRI acitivity

    Number of new (new T2, T1 gadolinium-enhancing) and expanding lesions

    Time frame: 27 months

  2. Expanded disability status scale (EDSS)

    Measured at 3, 15 and 27 months

    Time frame: 27 months

  3. Timed 25 foot walk test

    Measured at 3, 15 and 27 months

    Time frame: 27 months

  4. Nine hole peg test

    Measured at 3, 15 and 27 months

    Time frame: 27 months

  5. No evidence of disease activity

    Composite outcome: no relapses, no progression independent of relapse activity, no new lesions on brain or spinal cord MRI

    Time frame: 27 months

  6. Biomarkers neuronal damage

    Neurofilament light chain (Nfl) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)

    Time frame: 27 months

  7. Lower urinary tract symptoms

    * For females: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-FLUTS) * For males: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-MLUTS)

    Time frame: 27 months

07

Study locations

2 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
    's-Hertogenbosch, Brabant 5223GZ, Netherlands
    • Jeroen van Eijk · Contact · j.eijkvan@jbz.nl · +31735532325
    • Jeroen van Eijk · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Rijnstate
    Arnhem, Gelderland 6815AD, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
  • Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
    Geleen, Limburg 6162BG, Netherlands
    Recruiting
  • Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis
    Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland 3318AT, Netherlands
    • Janet de Beukelaar · Contact · beukelaarj@asz.nl · +31786541111
    • Janet de Beukelaar · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Erasmus MC
    Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3015GD, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Di Sabatino E, Gaetani L, Sperandei S, Fiacca A, Guercini G, Parnetti L, Di Filippo M. The no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) concept in MS: impact of spinal cord MRI. J Neurol. 2022 Jun;269(6):3129-3135. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10901-2. Epub 2021 Nov 24. PubMed 34820734 ↗
  • Kreiter D, Spee R, Merry A, Hupperts R, Gerlach O. Effect of disease-modifying treatment on spinal cord lesion formation in multiple sclerosis: A retrospective observational study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Nov;79:104994. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104994. Epub 2023 Sep 4. PubMed 37683557 ↗
  • Brownlee WJ, Altmann DR, Alves Da Mota P, Swanton JK, Miszkiel KA, Wheeler-Kingshott CG, Ciccarelli O, Miller DH. Association of asymptomatic spinal cord lesions and atrophy with disability 5 years after a clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):665-674. doi: 10.1177/1352458516663034. Epub 2016 Aug 6. PubMed 27481210 ↗
  • Granella F, Tsantes E, Graziuso S, Bazzurri V, Crisi G, Curti E. Spinal cord lesions are frequently asymptomatic in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a retrospective MRI survey. J Neurol. 2019 Dec;266(12):3031-3037. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09526-3. Epub 2019 Sep 7. PubMed 31494713 ↗
  • Zecca C, Disanto G, Sormani MP, Riccitelli GC, Cianfoni A, Del Grande F, Pravata E, Gobbi C. Relevance of asymptomatic spinal MRI lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2016 May;22(6):782-91. doi: 10.1177/1352458515599246. Epub 2015 Oct 12. PubMed 26459149 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06827834
Lead sponsor
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2025
Start date
Aug 6, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 14, 2025

Study contacts

Demmie Bouweriks, MD
Contact
d.bouweriks@zuyderland.nl
+31884597603

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion