CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06818513Updated Feb 10, 2025

Effects of Gastrostomy and Oral Tube Feeding on Patients With Dysphagia After Stroke

An interventional study of routine rehabilitation therapy and Gastrostomy in Stroke, Ischemic, sponsored by Muhammad. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-10.

Sponsored by Muhammad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the differences in swallowing function, quality of life and nutritional status between ischemic stroke patients with dysphagia using Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube and Gastrostomy. Patients will be randomly divided into an oral tube group and a Gastrostomy group, all receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. On this basis, the oral tube group will use Intermittent Oro esophageal Tube for enteral nutrition support, while the Gastrostomy group will use Gastrostomy. Researchers will compare changes in swallowing function, quality of life and nutritional status of two groups of patients before and after the study to see if Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube can improve the quality of life and nutritional status between ischemic stroke patients compared Gastrostomy.

Read the detailed description

This study will last 15 days for each patient. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the differences in swallowing function, quality of life and nutritional status between ischemic stroke patients with dysphagia using Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube and Gastrostomy. Patients will be randomly divided into an oral tube group and a Gastrostomy group, all receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. On this basis, the oral tube group will use Intermittent Oro esophageal Tube for enteral nutrition support, while the Gastrostomy group will use Gastrostomy. Researchers will compare changes in swallowing function, quality of life and nutritional status of two groups of patients before and after the study to see if Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube can improve the quality of life and nutritional status between ischemic stroke patients compared Gastrostomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Ischemic
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age>18 years.
  • Meeting the diagnostic criteria for ischemic stroke .
  • Dysphagia confirmed by Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study.
  • Clear consciousness.
  • No history of prior stroke.
  • Stable vital signs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of tracheostomy tubes.
  • Dysphagia that might be caused by other diseases that might cause dysphagia, such as head and neck tumors, traumatic brain injury, myasthenia gravis, etc.
  • Complicated with severe liver and kidney failure, tumors, or hematological disorders.
  • Simultaneously in need to undergo other therapy that might affect the outcomes of this study.
  • Pregnant or nursing females.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Oral tube group+routine rehabilitation therapy

    All patients are provided with routine rehabilitation therapy as follows: Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles. Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training. The oral tube group will be given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups.

    Behavioral: routine rehabilitation therapy · Dietary Supplement: Oral tube feeding

  • Active comparator
    Gastrostomy group+routine rehabilitation therapy

    All patients were provided with routine rehabilitation therapy as follows: Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles. Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training. The Gastrostomy group will be given enteral nutritional support with Gastrostomy. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups

    Behavioral: routine rehabilitation therapy · Dietary Supplement: Gastrostomy

Interventions

  • Behavioralroutine rehabilitation therapy

    Including: Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles. Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.

  • Dietary supplementGastrostomy

    Feeding begins through the gastrostomy tube. A registered dietitian will develop a tailored feeding plan, specifying the type and amount of nutrition. Healthcare providers regularly monitor the patient's tolerance to feeding, checking for any signs of complications. Adjustments to the feeding regimen may be made based on the patient's progress and nutritional needs.

  • Dietary supplementOral tube feeding

    During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Body mass index

    body mass index will be calculated as body weight/height\^2.

    Time frame: day 1 and day 15

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dysphagia Handicap Index

    The Dysphagia Handicap Index is a 25-item scale to evaluate swallowing-related quality of life. The scale scores range between 0 to 100 and a higher score indicate poorer quality of life

    Time frame: day 1 and day 15

  2. Penetration-Aspiration Scale

    The Penetration-Aspiration Scale was used to evaluate airway protection. The score could range between 0 and 8, with higher scores indicating poor swallowing safety.

    Time frame: day 1 and day 15

  3. Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile

    The Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile was conducted by an independent and registered speech-language pathologist. The scale includes 17 items to cover oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal phases of swallowing. The total score ranges from 0 to 55, with higher scores indicating poorer swallowing function.

    Time frame: day 1 and day 15

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06818513
Lead sponsor
Muhammad
Responsible party
Muhammad (The Research Director, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2025
Start date
Mar 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 10, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion