ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06303882Updated Mar 15, 2024

Effect of Computer-based Cognitive Function Training on Cognitive Dysphagia After Stroke

An interventional study of routine rehabilitation treatment and Computer-assisted Cognitive Function Training in Dysphagia, sponsored by Muhammad. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-15.

Sponsored by Muhammad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter randomized controlled study. The study recruited stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment and dysphagia who were undergoing inpatient rehabilitation treatment in three hospitals in mainland China as the participants (study subjects). The study duration for each participant was 15 days. The subjects were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. During the treatment, all patients received routine rehabilitation treatment. In addition, patients in the control group received conventional cognitive training, while patients in the experimental group received computer-assisted cognitive training.

Read the detailed description

Computer-assisted cognitive training is a rehabilitation method that uses computer technology and psychological principles to promote the recovery of cognitive function.This is a multicenter randomized controlled study. The study recruited stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment and dysphagia who were undergoing inpatient rehabilitation treatment in three hospitals in mainland China as the participants (study subjects). The study duration for each participant was 15 days. The subjects were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. During the treatment, all patients received routine rehabilitation treatment. In addition, patients in the control group received conventional cognitive training, while patients in the experimental group received computer-assisted cognitive training.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dysphagia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Deglutition Disorders

871 studies on the registry are indexed under Deglutition Disorders; 237 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 60 across 578 interventional studies indexed under Deglutition Disorders.

Browse Deglutition Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Muhammad is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Meeting the diagnostic criteria for traumatic brain injury, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging.
  • score \< 26 and > 18 (adjusted by 1 point if the educational level is high school graduation or above).
  • Confirmed swallowing disorder through Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing.
  • Duration of illness greater than three months.
  • Patients or their family members are aware of and consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of other intracranial lesions, such as stroke.
  • Cognitive impairment caused by other diseases.
  • Mental abnormalities.
  • Inability to complete treatment and assessments due to other impairments.
  • Concurrent severe injuries.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Computer-assisted Cognitive Function Training+routine rehabilitation treatment

    In this study, each patient received a continuous 15-day treatment. During the treatment, both groups of patients received routine rehabilitation treatment. The experimental group additionally underwent computer-assisted cognitive training, which generated training content of corresponding difficulty based on the patient's cognitive impairment assessment results. The training was conducted seven days a week, once a day, for a duration of 30-45 minutes per session.

    Behavioral: routine rehabilitation treatment · Behavioral: Computer-assisted Cognitive Function Training

  • Active comparator
    routine rehabilitation treatment+conventional cognitive training

    In this study, each patient received a continuous 15-day treatment. During the treatment, both groups of patients received routine rehabilitation treatment.The control group was given conventional cognitive training.

    Behavioral: routine rehabilitation treatment · Behavioral: conventional cognitive training

Interventions

  • Behavioralroutine rehabilitation treatment

    The routine rehabilitation treatment included intervention for risk factors (such as blood pressure, blood lipids, and blood glucose control, restriction of smoking and alcohol, exercise, etc.) Besides, the patients with stable vital signs were scheduled for specialized rehabilitation training upon enrollment, and targeted rehabilitation programs were selected, conducted by experienced rehabilitation therapists.

  • BehavioralComputer-assisted Cognitive Function Training

    Based on the patient's cognitive impairment assessment results, the training content includes Attention game training, Executive function program training, Logical reasoning training, Agility training, Memory training. The training is conducted seven days a week, once a day, for a duration of 30-45 minutes per session

  • Behavioralconventional cognitive training

    including Memory training, attention training, and executive function training were conducted 2-5 times per week, lasting for 30-60 minutes each session, based on the patient's condition.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is used for assessing cognitive function.The total score on the test is 30, the higher scores indicating the higher cognitive function The total score ranged from 0 to 30.

    Time frame: day 1 and day 15

Secondary outcomes

  1. The coordination of swallowing

    Observation of the coordination of laryngeal and vocal fold movements. Results are categorized as normal/abnormal.

    Time frame: day 1 and day 15

  2. Penetration-Aspiration Scale

    Penetration-Aspiration Scale was used to assess dysphagia under Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study, primarily evaluating the extent to which fluid food entered the airway and caused penetration or aspiration during the swallowing process. As the level increased, the severity of dysphagia also increased. The higher scores indicating worse swallowing function The total score ranged from 0 to 8.

    Time frame: day 1 and day 15

  3. Swallowing duration

    The time duration that the patient swallowed the contrast agent under Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study the was recorded.Unit: seconds.

    Time frame: day 1 and day 15

  4. Swallowing reflex

    Observation of the ability to initiate swallowing movements during eating, manifested by the white-out phenomenon seen under flexible laryngoscopy. Results are categorized as normal or abnormal.

    Time frame: day 1 and day 15

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2024; primary completion for Jun 2024, 3 months later.

Of 288 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Deglutition Disorders, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 297 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 5, 2024
First posted
Mar 12, 2024
StartEst.
Mar 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2024
CompletionEst.
Jun 2024
Last update
Mar 15, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06303882
Lead sponsor
Muhammad
Responsible party
Muhammad (Research Director, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2024
Start date
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 15, 2024

Study contacts

Lavie Ce, Master
Contact
zenghongjixx@qq.com
15333828388
Nieto Luis, Master
study chair · Site Coordinator of United Medical Group located in Miami

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion