ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06816056Updated Feb 10, 2025

Manual Therapy in Hemophilic Arthropathy of the Ankle

An interventional study of Manual Therapy and Placebo in Hemophilia A, sponsored by Investigación en Hemofilia y Fisioterapia. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-10.

Sponsored by Investigación en Hemofilia y Fisioterapia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Introduction: Haemophilic ankle arthropathy manifests as functional (deficit in muscle strength, mobility and proprioception), intra-articular degenerative alterations and chronic pain. Manual therapy techniques are characterised by treating the soft tissues with the aim of modifying their density, relieving pain, reducing tissue sensitivity and improving the ranges of mobility. The objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a manual therapy protocol in patients with haemophilic ankle arthropathy.

Methods: Randomised crossover clinical trial. 13 patients with haemophilic ankle arthropathy from different regions of Spain will be recruited and randomised into two study groups (experimental and control). Each session of the experimental group will last 50 minutes, with 1 physiotherapy session per week for a period of 3 weeks. Patients will be evaluated at the beginning of the study, after the intervention and after a follow-up period of 4 weeks. The treatment programme includes 10 techniques that must be administered bilaterally. The study variables are the frequency of ankle haemarthrosis, range of movement, pressure pain threshold, pain intensity, joint status, biomechanical analysis of gait and balance, functionality and kinesiophobia.

Expected results: To evaluate the safety of manual therapy in patients with haemophilia. To observe changes in pain, mobility, joint condition, stability and functionality of the ankle, and kinesiophobia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia A

Keywords

  • Hemophilic arthropathy
  • Ankle
  • Manual therapy
  • Joint pain
03

In context

Hemophilia A

885 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 139 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 13 is below the median of 27 across 523 interventional studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

Investigación en Hemofilia y Fisioterapia is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with haemophilia A and B
  • With severe haemophilia phenotype (\<1% FVIII/FIX)
  • Over 18 years of age
  • With a medical diagnosis of ankle arthropathy and with clinical assessment using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score
  • On prophylactic or on-demand treatment with coagulation factor VIII/FIX concentrates

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neurological or cognitive disorders that prevent them from understanding the questionnaires and physical tests
  • Failure to sign the informed consent document
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
13 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    The intervention will last 3 weeks, with a periodicity of 1 weekly sessions. In total there will be 3 sessions lasting 50 minutes. The techniques will be: global passive mobilisation, calcaneocuboid mobilisation, talus-navicular mobilisation, talar manipulation, tibial displacement manipulation, tibiotarsal decompression, plantar fascia induction, tibiotarsal unwinding traction technique and triceps surae induction technique

    Other: Manual Therapy

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group

    The patients included in the control group will receive the same physiotherapy intervention in the form of a placebo. The physiotherapist in charge of this intervention will perform the same number of techniques but without applying sliding stimuli, myofascial induction or manipulation. The hands will be positioned in the same way and the times per technique will be the same as in the techniques of the experimental group.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • OtherManual Therapy

    The patients included in the experimental group will receive a 50-minute physiotherapy intervention involving global passive mobilisation, calcaneocuboid mobilisation, talus-navicular mobilisation, talar manipulation, tibial displacement manipulation, tibiotarsal decompression, plantar fascia induction, tibiotarsal unwinding and triceps surae induction techniques

  • OtherPlacebo

    The patients included in the control group will receive a 50-minute physiotherapy intervention in which the physiotherapist's hands and the times per technique will be the same as in the experimental group, but without applying any sliding, mobilisation or manipulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline hemarthrosis after treatment and at four weeks

    A self-registration will be used to evaluate the frequency of bleeding, and thus the safety of the technique. This self-registration will be given to each patient at the beginning of the study and they must fill in the number of hemarthrosis and their main characteristics: date, origin (traumatic or spontaneous). The self-registration will be delivered to the evaluator in each of the study evaluations (post-treatment and follow-up).

    Time frame: Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after four weeks follow-up visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline pressure pain threshold after treatment and at four weeks

    Using a pressure algometer (model Wagner FPN100) we will measure the pain threshold to pressure, at the level of the joint and at a distance (in another part of the body). This device measures in Newton/cm2 the pressure at which the subject perceives pain under pressure. Pressure will be applied to the chosen point, which will be increased at a rate of approximately 50 kPa/s until the patient informs us that the sensation is starting to become painful. The lateral and medial malleoli of the ankle will be evaluated

    Time frame: Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after four weeks follow-up visit

  2. Change from baseline joint status after treatment and at four weeks

    Change from knee and ankle joint status during treatment and follow-up period at four weeks. Measurement instrument: Haemophilia Joint Health Score (scale 0-20).

    Time frame: Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after four weeks follow-up visit

  3. Change from baseline range of motion after treatment and at four weeks

    Change from range of movement of ankle during treatment and follow-up period at four weeks. The range of motion of the ankle joint will be measured using a universal goniometer, using the protocol for measuring joint motion described by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

    Time frame: Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after four weeks follow-up visit

  4. Change from baseline joint pain after treatment and at four weeks

    Change in ankle intensity during treatment and the four-week follow-up period. Ankle joint pain intensity will be measured using the visual analogue scale with a range of 0 to 10 points, where the higher the score, the greater the perception of joint pain

    Time frame: Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after four weeks follow-up visit

  5. Change from baseline functional capacity after treatment and at four weeks

    Change in functional capacity during treatment and the four-week follow-up period. Functional capacity will be measured using the 2-Minutes Walking Test. The maximum distance that patients can cover in a period of six minutes walking as fast as possible will be measured. The unit of measurement is the metre, where the greater the distance, the better the functional capacity.

    Time frame: Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after four weeks follow-up visit

  6. Change from baseline kinesiophobia after treatment and at four weeks

    Change in kinesiophobia during treatment and the four-week follow-up period. Fear of movement will be measured using the Tampa scale, which consists of 11 items on a 4-point Likert scale, with responses ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The lowest possible score, 11, denotes insignificant or non-existent kinesiophobia. The highest possible score, 44, denotes a severe fear of feeling pain when moving

    Time frame: Screening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after four weeks follow-up visit

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Universidad Católica San Antonio
    Murcia, Spain
    • Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso, PhD · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2025; primary completion for Jul 2025, 5 months later.

Of 60 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hemophilia A, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 63 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 3, 2025
First posted
Feb 10, 2025
StartEst.
Feb 5, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 21, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 25, 2025
Last update
Feb 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06816056
Lead sponsor
Investigación en Hemofilia y Fisioterapia
Responsible party
Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso (Principal Investigator, Investigación en Hemofilia y Fisioterapia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2025
Start date
Feb 5, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 21, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 25, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 10, 2025

Study contacts

Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso, PhD
Contact
cuestaruben@uniovi.es
607547274
Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad de Oviedo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion