ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06802783Updated Jan 31, 2025

Impact of Procedure Materials on Patient Anxiety, Depression, and Pain in Prostate Biopsy Consent

An interventional study of Photo consent in Prostate Biopsy, sponsored by Marmara University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to male participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-31.

Sponsored by Marmara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Dec 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The gold standard for diagnosing prostate cancer is an ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Despite its low complication rates, the procedure can cause significant stress, discomfort and anxiety in patients. This study aimed to determine whether visually introducing the materials (ultrasound, probe, biopsy needle) used during the biopsy could reduce patient anxiety and increase comfort.

Read the detailed description

Forty patients suspected of having prostate cancer were included in this prospective study. All patients received detailed information about the procedure, but they were divided into two groups. The first group was shown photographs of the devices alongside the written consent form, while the second group received only the written consent. The study compared the pain, depression and anxiety scores between the two groups

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Biopsy

Keywords

  • prostate biopsy
  • anxiety
  • pain
  • depression
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

5,063 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,408 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 80 across 4,339 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University is the lead sponsor of 589 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- patient's clinical data indicated the need for a prostate biopsy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • included having a diagnosis of psychiatric illness
  • having previously undergone a prostate biopsy under local anesthesia
  • being a patient under active surveillance for prostate cancer
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    written consent group

    Only traditional written consent will be provided to this group.

  • Active comparator
    photo-consent group

    Photo consent which show materials use in procedure will be provided to this group before the biopsy

    Other: Photo consent

Interventions

  • OtherPhoto consent

    The first group was shown photographs of the devices alongside the written consent form, while the second group received only the written consent. The study compared the pain, depression and anxiety scores between the two groups.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anxiety Level

    For Anxiety, Hospital Anxiety Scale used. In the Hospital Anxiety Score, the minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 21. As the score increases, it indicates higher levels of anxiety.

    Time frame: Pre-procedure

  2. Depression Level

    For Depression, Hospital Depression Scale used . In the Hospital Depression Score, the minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 21. As the score increases, it indicates higher levels of depression.

    Time frame: Pre-procedure

  3. Pain Level

    For Pain, Visual Analog Scale used. In the Visual Analog Pain Scale, the minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 10. As the score increases, it indicates higher levels of pain.

    Time frame: Pre procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anxiety Level

    For Anxiety, Hospital Anxiety Scale used. In the Hospital Anxiety Score, the minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 21. As the score increases, it indicates higher levels of anxiety.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

  2. Depression Level

    For Depression, Hospital Depression Scale used . In the Hospital Depression Score, the minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 21. As the score increases, it indicates higher levels of depression

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

  3. Pain Level

    For Pain, Visual Analog Scale used. In the Visual Analog Pain Scale, the minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 10. As the score increases, it indicates higher levels of pain.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Marmara University School of Medicine Urology Department
    Istanbul, Istanbul 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 10 months.

Of 2,720 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anxiety Disorders, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31. This study's 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,789 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 23, 2024
First posted
Jan 31, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Nov 12, 2024
CompletionEst.
Jan 30, 2025
Last update
Jan 31, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06802783
Lead sponsor
Marmara University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 12, 2024
Completion
Jan 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 31, 2025

Study contacts

BAHADIR SAHIN
study director · MARMARA UNİVERSİTY SCHOOL OF MEDİCİNE DEPARTMENT OF UROLOGY

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion