ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07892885MeltzUpdated Oct 23, 2026

A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Meltz, a Digital Therapeutic Device, for Improving Panic Symptoms in Patients With Panic Disorder

An interventional study of Meltz and Sham Application in Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia, sponsored by AIMNEXT. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by AIMNEXT · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

i. This randomized clinical trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Meltz, a digital therapeutic device that provides cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for adults with panic disorder.

ii. Participants will be randomly assigned to use either Meltz or a sham application. Meltz provides personalized CBT for panic disorder through a smartphone application, while the sham application is similar in appearance and manner of use but does not provide the core therapeutic functions of Meltz. The treatment program is completed within 8 to 10 weeks depending on each participant's treatment progress.

iii. This study will evaluate whether Meltz is more effective than the sham application in improving panic symptoms. The primary outcome is the change from baseline to Week 10 in the total score of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self Report (PDSS-SR), a questionnaire used to assess the severity of panic disorder symptoms. The safety of Meltz will also be evaluated based on adverse events reported during the clinical trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Panic Disorder
  • Agoraphobia

Keywords

  • Digital Therapeutics
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
  • Digital Phenotyping
  • Personalized Intervention
  • Panic Symptoms
  • Agoraphobic Symptoms
  • Anxiety Symptoms
03

In context

Panic Disorder

256 studies on the registry are indexed under Panic Disorder; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 78 across 201 interventional studies indexed under Panic Disorder.

Browse Panic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with AIMNEXT as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female participants aged 19 years or older and under 65 years at the time of providing written informed consent.
  2. Participants who meet the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for panic disorder or have a diagnosis corresponding to one or more of the following ICD-10 codes:

F41.0: Panic disorder / panic attack / panic state F40.0: Agoraphobia / agoraphobia without a history of panic disorder / panic disorder with agoraphobia 3. Participants with a score on the Korean version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self Report (PDSS-SR) meeting the following criteria according to the presence or absence of agoraphobia: Without agoraphobia: ≥6 points With agoraphobia: ≥8 points 4. Participants who have no difficulty reading and writing Korean. 5. Participants who have no difficulty using a smartphone application. 6. Participants who, after receiving sufficient information about the clinical trial and fully understanding the information provided, voluntarily decide to participate, provide written informed consent, and agree to comply with the study requirements and instructions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

  1. Participants who have any of the following psychiatric conditions at the time of providing written informed consent

    : Schizophrenia spectrum disorders, a manic episode, a major depressive episode, or substance use disorders*

  2. Participants who have a lifetime history of any of the following psychiatric diagnoses as of the date of written informed consent

    : Schizophrenia spectrum disorders or substance use disorders*

    *However, participants with alcohol use disorder (AUD) may be included if the disorder is classified as mild according to the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, they have no history of hospitalization or emergency department visits due to alcohol-related problems within the 3 months prior to providing written informed consent, and the investigator determines, based on medical judgment, that the condition would not interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the requirements of the clinical trial.

  3. Participants who, at the time of providing written informed consent, have a medical condition that is uncontrolled or severe enough to require hospitalization.
  4. Participants who have attempted suicide within the 3 months prior to providing written informed consent and are assessed by a psychiatrist as being at high risk of suicide.
  5. Participants who have newly initiated another cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) within the 3 months prior to providing written informed consent or who are currently receiving another CBT intervention, including CBT for panic disorder or any other condition.
  6. Participants with visual or hearing impairment, or cognitive impairment (e.g., intellectual disability or dementia).
  7. Participants who, within the 4 weeks prior to screening, have had a change in the type, dosage, or dosing regimen of any medication they are taking.

However, participants meeting any of the following conditions may participate in the clinical trial:

4) Background therapy: Participants taking psychiatric medication for the management of panic symptoms may participate if the type, dosage, and dosing regimen of the medication have remained unchanged for at least 4 weeks prior to screening.

5) Pro re nata (PRN) medication: Participants using PRN medication for the relief of acute panic symptoms may participate even if there has been a change in the type, dosage, or dosing regimen of such PRN medication within the 4 weeks prior to screening.

6) Non-psychiatric medications:

  1. Medications for chronic medical conditions: Participants taking non-psychiatric medications for the treatment of underlying chronic medical conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidemia, that are not expected to directly affect the assessment of panic symptoms may participate if the dosage and dosing regimen have remained unchanged for at least 4 weeks.
  2. Medications for transient symptoms: Participants who have taken short-term medications within the 4 weeks prior to screening for the relief of transient symptoms, such as a common cold, mild pain, or indigestion, that are not expected to directly affect the assessment of panic symptoms may participate.

8. Participants who, in the investigator's judgment, are considered unsuitable for participation in this clinical trial.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Meltz

    Participants assigned to the Meltz group use the Meltz digital therapeutic device. The program provides personalized cognitive behavioral therapy for panic disorder (CBT-P) through a smartphone application and is completed within 8 to 10 weeks depending on each participant's treatment progress.

    Device: Meltz

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Control

    An interventional study must have at least one arm with Arm Type other than Placebo Comparator or Sham Comparator.

    Device: Sham Application

Interventions

  • DeviceMeltz

    Meltz is a software-based digital therapeutic device that provides personalized cognitive behavioral therapy for panic disorder (CBT-P). The program includes psychoeducation, self-monitoring, cognitive restructuring, exposure to fear cues, modification of anxiety-maintaining behaviors, relaxation training, and relapse prevention. Meltz also provides educational content, real-time feedback, behavioral interventions, and push notifications to support treatment adherence.

  • DeviceSham Application

    The sham application is similar to Meltz in appearance and manner of use but does not provide the core therapeutic functions of Meltz. It does not provide CBT-P treatment content, personalized treatment recommendations based on treatment progress, real-life exposure training, or prediction checklist completion. It provides only management functions, including psychological questionnaires and mood and panic records.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self Report (PDSS-SR) Total Score at End of Treatment

    The Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self Report (PDSS-SR) is a 7-item self-report measure used by participants to assess the severity of panic disorder. Each item is rated from 0 to 4 based on experiences during the previous week, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28. Lower total scores indicate greater improvement or alleviation of panic symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants with a ≥40% Reduction in PDSS-SR Total Score

    The proportion of participants with a ≥40% reduction in the PDSS-SR total score from baseline at 10 weeks after application of the investigational or comparator device.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  2. Proportion of Participants with a PDSS-SR Total Score ≤5

    Proportion of Participants with a PDSS-SR Total Score ≤5 The proportion of participants with a PDSS-SR total score ≤5 at 10 weeks after application of the investigational or comparator device.

    Time frame: Week 10

  3. Change in Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) Total Score

    The PDSS consists of the same 7 items as the PDSS-SR but is administered by a clinician through a structured interview. Each item is rated from 0 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28. Lower total scores indicate improvement or alleviation of panic symptoms. The criteria for interpreting the total score are the same as those for the PDSS-SR.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  4. Change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State Anxiety Score

    The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) assesses anxiety in two dimensions: anxiety as a temporary emotional state (state anxiety, STAI-1) and anxiety as a persistent personality trait (trait anxiety, STAI-2). STAI-1 consists of 20 items, with a total score ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores indicate improvement or alleviation of anxiety. Positively worded items (e.g., "I feel calm") are reverse-scored.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  5. Change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Trait Anxiety Score

    The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) assesses anxiety in two dimensions: anxiety as a temporary emotional state (state anxiety, STAI-1) and anxiety as a persistent personality trait (trait anxiety, STAI-2). STAI-2 consists of 20 items, with a total score ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores indicate improvement or alleviation of anxiety. Positively worded items are reverse-scored.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  6. Change in Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ) Score

    The Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ) is a 14-item measure that assesses the frequency of catastrophic thoughts that spontaneously occur when a person feels anxious or tense. Each item is rated from 1 to 5 according to how often the thought occurs during an anxious state. Lower scores indicate a reduction in the frequency of catastrophic cognitions and improvement in cognitive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  7. Change in Albany Panic and Phobia Questionnaire (APPQ) Score

    The Albany Panic and Phobia Questionnaire (APPQ) is a 27-item measure that assesses fear and avoidance related to panic- and phobia-related situations. Each item is rated from 0 to 8 according to the current level of fear and avoidance associated with the situation. The APPQ consists of three subscales: agoraphobia (14 items), social phobia (8 items), and interoceptive fear (5 items). Each subscale score is calculated by summing the corresponding item scores. Lower total and subscale scores indicate reduced fear and avoidance behavior and clinically meaningful improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  8. Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Total Score

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a 7-item self-report measure that assesses the severity of generalized anxiety disorder and general anxiety symptoms. Each item is rated from 0 to 3 based on experiences during the previous 2 weeks, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 21.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  9. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Total Score

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-report measure of the severity of depressive symptoms and assesses the nine symptoms of a depressive episode based on DSM diagnostic criteria. Each item is rated from 0 to 3 based on experiences during the previous 2 weeks, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 27.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  10. Change in EuroQol 5-Dimension Score

    The EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) is a self-report measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) consisting of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is assessed on five levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems (levels 1-5).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  11. Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score

    The Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the severity of illness. Scores are rated as follows: 0 = Not assessed; 1 = Normal, not at all ill; 2 = Borderline mentally ill; 3 = Mildly ill; 4 = Moderately ill; 5 = Markedly ill; 6 = Severely ill; and 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

  12. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score

    The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) is a clinician-rated scale that assesses overall change relative to baseline. No separate baseline CGI-I assessment is performed, and the CGI-I score is assessed at Week 10. Scores are rated as follows: 0 = Not assessed; 1 = Very much improved; 2 = Much improved; 3 = Minimally improved; 4 = No change; 5 = Minimally worse; 6 = Much worse; and 7 = Very much worse.

    Time frame: Week 10

  13. Change in Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self Report (PDSS-SR) Total Score at End of Study

    The Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self Report (PDSS-SR) is a 7-item self-report measure used by participants to assess the severity of panic disorder. Each item is rated from 0 to 4 based on experiences during the previous week, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28. Lower total scores indicate greater improvement or alleviation of panic symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 18

  14. Overall Cumulative Treatment Adherence

    Adherence data are continuously collected and reviewed throughout the treatment period, and overall cumulative treatment adherence is calculated at Visit 6 using data accumulated from Visit 2 through Visit 6. For participants in the Meltz group, adherence is based on the number of completed treatment stages out of 77 total assigned stages. For participants in the sham control group, adherence is based on the number of days on which at least one mood or panic diary entry is completed during the period from Visit 2 through Visit 6

    Time frame: From treatment initiation (Visit 2) through Week 10 (Visit 6)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Oromendia P, Orrego J, Bonillo A, Molinuevo B. Internet-based self-help treatment for panic disorder: a randomized controlled trial comparing mandatory versus optional complementary psychological support. Cogn Behav Ther. 2016 Jun;45(4):270-86. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1163615. Epub 2016 Mar 23. PubMed 27007256 ↗
  • Allen AR, Newby JM, Mackenzie A, Smith J, Boulton M, Loughnan SA, Andrews G. Internet cognitive-behavioural treatment for panic disorder: randomised controlled trial and evidence of effectiveness in primary care. BJPsych Open. 2016 Mar 24;2(2):154-162. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.001826. eCollection 2016 Mar. PubMed 27703768 ↗
  • Barlow DH, Gorman JM, Shear MK, Woods SW. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, imipramine, or their combination for panic disorder: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000 May 17;283(19):2529-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.19.2529. PubMed 10815116 ↗
  • Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6. PubMed 2691207 ↗
  • Kim SH, Ahn J, Ock M, Shin S, Park J, Luo N, Jo MW. The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea. Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1845-52. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1205-2. Epub 2016 Mar 10. PubMed 26961008 ↗
  • 39. Kazantzis N, Whittington C, Dattilio F. Meta-Analysis of Homework Effects in Cognitive and Behavioral Therapy: A Replication and Extension. Clin Psychol Sci Prac. 2010;17(2):144-156.
  • Sandell R, Svensson M, Nilsson T, Johansson H, Viborg G, Perrin S. The POSE study - panic control treatment versus panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy under randomized and self-selection conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Mar 31;16:130. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0656-7. PubMed 25873067 ↗
  • 37. 서호석, 이재헌, 김민숙, 김민경. 공황장애의 한국형 최신 치료지침. J Korean Med Assoc. 2018;61(8):493-499.
  • Furukawa TA, Katherine Shear M, Barlow DH, Gorman JM, Woods SW, Money R, Etschel E, Engel RR, Leucht S. Evidence-based guidelines for interpretation of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(10):922-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20532. PubMed 19006198 ↗
  • 34. 대한민국정부. 디지털의료제품법 (법률 제20331호). 2025.
  • 33. Y Byeon, JY Lee. Current Status of Digital Therapeutic Devices in Cognitive Intervention in South Korea. J Cogn Interv Digital Health. 2025;4(1):11-19.
  • Carl JR, Miller CB, Henry AL, Davis ML, Stott R, Smits JAJ, Emsley R, Gu J, Shin O, Otto MW, Craske MG, Saunders KEA, Goodwin GM, Espie CA. Efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for moderate-to-severe symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Depress Anxiety. 2020 Dec;37(12):1168-1178. doi: 10.1002/da.23079. Epub 2020 Jul 29. PubMed 32725848 ↗
  • Sheikh JI, Leskin GA, Klein DF. Gender differences in panic disorder: findings from the National Comorbidity Survey. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;159(1):55-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.1.55. PubMed 11772690 ↗
  • Kim JE, Song IH, Lee SH. Gender Differences of Stressful Life Events, Coping Style, Symptom Severity, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Panic Disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Sep;205(9):714-719. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000696. PubMed 28609311 ↗
  • 29. Doug-Woong Hahn, Chang Ho Lee, & Kyum Koo Chon. (1996). Korean Adaptation of Spielberger's STAI (K-STAI). The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 1(1), 1-14.
  • 28. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene. R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • 27. KIM, JI HAE; Jong-Chul Yang; Kim, Jung Bum; Ki-Young Lim; 이소영; 유범희. A Validation Study of Korean Albany Panic and Phobia Questionnaire (APPQ). JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. 2004; 43(3) 329-336.
  • 26. Ho Taek Won, Hyun Soon Park, & Seok Man Kwon. (1995). A Study on the development of the Korean versions of Panic Scales. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 14(1), 95-110.
  • Chambless DL, Caputo GC, Bright P, Gallagher R. Assessment of fear of fear in agoraphobics: the body sensations questionnaire and the agoraphobic cognitions questionnaire. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Dec;52(6):1090-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.52.6.1090. No abstract available. PubMed 6520279 ↗
  • 24. Guy, W. (1976). ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. PubMed 11556941 ↗
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. PubMed 16717171 ↗
  • 21. Roy-Byrne, P. P., et al. (2005). Comorbidity of panic disorder with psychiatric and physical illnesses. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66(Suppl 4), 14-19.
  • Houck PR, Spiegel DA, Shear MK, Rucci P. Reliability of the self-report version of the panic disorder severity scale. Depress Anxiety. 2002;15(4):183-5. doi: 10.1002/da.10049. PubMed 12112724 ↗
  • Shear MK, Brown TA, Barlow DH, Money R, Sholomskas DE, Woods SW, Gorman JM, Papp LA. Multicenter collaborative panic disorder severity scale. Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;154(11):1571-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.11.1571. PubMed 9356566 ↗
  • Olthuis JV, Watt MC, Bailey K, Hayden JA, Stewart SH. Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5;(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565. PubMed 25742186 ↗
  • Katzman MA, Bleau P, Blier P, Chokka P, Kjernisted K, Van Ameringen M; Canadian Anxiety Guidelines Initiative Group on behalf of the Anxiety Disorders Association of Canada/Association Canadienne des troubles anxieux and McGill University; Antony MM, Bouchard S, Brunet A, Flament M, Grigoriadis S, Mendlowitz S, O'Connor K, Rabheru K, Richter PM, Robichaud M, Walker JR. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-S1-S1. Epub 2014 Jul 2. PubMed 25081580 ↗
  • Baldwin DS, Anderson IM, Nutt DJ, Allgulander C, Bandelow B, den Boer JA, Christmas DM, Davies S, Fineberg N, Lidbetter N, Malizia A, McCrone P, Nabarro D, O'Neill C, Scott J, van der Wee N, Wittchen HU. Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a revision of the 2005 guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol. 2014 May;28(5):403-39. doi: 10.1177/0269881114525674. Epub 2014 Apr 8. PubMed 24713617 ↗
  • Bos E, Preller KH, Kaur G, Malhotra P, Kharawala S, Motti D. Challenges With the Use of Digital Sham: Systematic Review and Recommendations. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 24;25:e44764. doi: 10.2196/44764. PubMed 37874638 ↗
  • Carlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Hedman-Lagerlof E. Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115. Epub 2017 Dec 7. PubMed 29215315 ↗
  • Rozental A, Boettcher J, Andersson G, Schmidt B, Carlbring P. Negative effects of internet interventions: a qualitative content analysis of patients' experiences with treatments delivered online. Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(3):223-36. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1008033. Epub 2015 Feb 23. PubMed 25705924 ↗
  • 11. AIMneXt Co., Ltd. Clinical Study Report. A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Exploratory Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of 'Meltz', a Digital Therapeutic, on Panic Symptoms in Patients with Panic Disorder. Protocol No. AM-IS-05. Seoul, Korea: AIMneXt Co., Ltd; 2026. Unpublished internal document.
  • 10. 식품의약품안전처. (2022). 공황장애 개선 디지털치료기기 안전성·성능 평가 및 임상시험계획서 작성 가이드라인(민원인 안내서).
  • Berger T, Urech A, Krieger T, Stolz T, Schulz A, Vincent A, Moser CT, Moritz S, Meyer B. Effects of a transdiagnostic unguided Internet intervention ('velibra') for anxiety disorders in primary care: results of a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2017 Jan;47(1):67-80. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002270. Epub 2016 Sep 22. PubMed 27655039 ↗
  • 8. Spies J, et al. (2024). A Smart Solution? Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App for Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1-14.
  • Tolin DF, McGrath PB, Hale LR, Weiner DN, Gueorguieva R. A Multisite Benchmarking Trial of Capnometry Guided Respiratory Intervention for Panic Disorder in Naturalistic Treatment Settings. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2017 Mar;42(1):51-58. doi: 10.1007/s10484-017-9354-4. PubMed 28194546 ↗
  • Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 13;5(10):e13196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013196. PubMed 20967242 ↗
  • 5. HJ Seo, KS Lee, SH Lee, et al. Recent Advances in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Panic Disorder. Anxiety and Mood. 2016;12(1):47-57
  • Kazdin AE. Addressing the treatment gap: A key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jan;88:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004. PubMed 28110678 ↗
  • Mitte K. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of psycho- and pharmacotherapy in panic disorder with and without agoraphobia. J Affect Disord. 2005 Sep;88(1):27-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.05.003. PubMed 16005982 ↗
  • 2. DW Black, JE Grant. DSM-5® Guidebook: The Essential Companion to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Pub. 2014
  • 1. MK Kim, JH Lee, M Gim, et al. Korean Guidelines for the Treatment of Panic Disorder 2018: Initial and Maintenance Treatment Strategies for the Phrmacological Treatment of Panic Disorder. Anxiety and Mood. 2018;14(2):53-62

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — all IPD that underlie results in a publication

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07892885
Lead sponsor
AIMNEXT
Collaborators
Korea University Anam Hospital, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, National Traffic Injury Rehabilitation Hospital, CHA University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Cheolhyeon Coordinating Investigator
Contact
david0203@gmail.com
82+02-920-5505
Seulgi Clinical Research Coordinator
Contact
leeseulki625@gmail.com
82+010-5190-5467
Cheolhyeon Cho
principal investigator · Korea University Anam Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion