ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06789367Updated Mar 16, 2026

The Effect of Dexamethasone Administration Route in PENG Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of perineural Dexamethasone 4mg and intravenous Dexamethsone 4mg in Hip Dysplasia and Hip Disease, sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 3 Months to 6 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-16.

Sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Months to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to assess the impact of the administration route of dexamethasone (intravenous vs. perineural) on postoperative pain, inflammatory response, and neuromonitoring parameters in pediatric patients undergoing hip surgery. The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity measured using an age-appropriate pain scale at multiple time intervals. Secondary outcomes include inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, and overall patient recovery. This randomized, double-blinded study seeks to improve pain management strategies and optimize anesthesia protocols in pediatric hip surgery.

Read the detailed description

Pediatric hip surgery is a complex procedure that can result in significant postoperative pain and an inflammatory response. Effective pain management is critical in this population to promote early mobilization, reduce opioid consumption, and minimize adverse outcomes. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a regional anesthesia technique that offers targeted analgesia for hip procedures while preserving motor function, making it particularly suitable for pediatric patients.

Dexamethasone is commonly used as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia to prolong analgesia and mitigate inflammation. However, the optimal administration route of dexamethasone in the context of PENG block for pediatric hip surgery remains unclear. This study is designed to compare the efficacy of intravenous versus perineural dexamethasone in prolonging postoperative analgesia and reducing inflammatory responses.

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial will enroll pediatric patients undergoing elective hip surgery. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one group will receive intravenous dexamethasone, while the other will receive perineural dexamethasone administered as part of the PENG block. All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia and PENG block using a local anesthetic at a fixed concentration.

The primary outcome will be time to first request rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes include the inflammatory response measured by NLR and PLR, postoperative pain intensity, assessed using an age-appropriate pain scale at predefined time intervals, total opioid consumption, and blood glucose levels. The study will also monitor neuromonitoring parameters during surgery to ensure patient safety and evaluate the influence of dexamethasone on neurological outcomes.

Safety will be closely monitored throughout the study, with particular attention to potential complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) or dexamethasone-related adverse events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Dysplasia
  • Hip Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pericapsular nerve group block
  • PENG block
  • dexamethasone
  • adjuvant
03

In context

Hip Dislocation

107 studies on the registry are indexed under Hip Dislocation; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 86 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Hip Dislocation.

Browse Hip Dislocation studies →

Lead sponsor

Poznan University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 151 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Months to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • children scheduled for hip surgery
  • body weight > 5kg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • infection at the site of the regional block,
  • coagulation disorders,
  • immunodeficiency,
  • (ASA) physical status of IV or higher,
  • history of regular medication.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    perinerual dexamethasone

    PENG block + perineural dexamethasone

    Drug: perineural Dexamethasone 4mg

  • Active comparator
    intravenous dexamethasone

    PENG block + intravenous dexamethasone

    Drug: intravenous Dexamethsone 4mg

Interventions

  • Drugperineural Dexamethasone 4mg

    PENG block with 0.5ml/kg 0.2% ropivacaine + 0,1mgkg perineural Dexamethasone

  • Drugintravenous Dexamethsone 4mg

    PENG block with 0,5ml/kg 0.2% ropivacaine + 0,1mg/kg intravenous Dexamethasone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to first rescue opioid analgesia

    Time to first rescue opioid analgesia

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total opioid consumption

    Total opioid consumption in milliequivalents of morphine

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  2. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."

    Time frame: 4 hours after surgery

  3. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."

    Time frame: 8 hours after surgery

  4. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  5. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  6. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  7. Nerve damage

    Nerve damage assesent will be performed using scale: N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- majorcomplete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  8. Nerve damage

    Nerve damage assesent will be performed using scale: N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- majorcomplete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  9. Nerve damage

    Nerve damage assesent will be performed using scale: N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- majorcomplete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  10. NLR

    Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  11. NLR

    Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  12. NLR

    Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  13. PLR

    Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  14. PLR

    Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  15. PLR

    Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  16. glucose

    blood glucose levels

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  17. glucose

    blood glucose levels

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  18. glucose

    blood glucose levels

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Poznan University of Medical Sciences
    Poznan, 60-701, Poland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2025 to primary completion in Feb 2026, 12 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2025
First posted
Jan 23, 2025
StartActual
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completionActual
Feb 14, 2026
CompletionActual
Mar 3, 2026
Last update
Mar 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06789367
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2025
Start date
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 14, 2026
Completion
Mar 3, 2026
Last update
Mar 16, 2026

Study contacts

Malgorzata Reysner, M.D. Ph.D.
study chair · Poznań University of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion