ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07924709Updated Nov 9, 2026

Functional Recovery After PENG Block Plus Periarticular Injection Versus Periarticular Injection Alone in Total Hip Arthroplasty

An interventional study of Posterior Capsular Local Infiltration Analgesia and Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block in Hip Ostearthritis, sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in Poland. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Poznan University of Medical Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
260
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pain after hip replacement can make it difficult for older adults to get out of bed, stand up, and walk. This study will investigate whether adding a nerve block to pain-relieving injections given during surgery helps patients regain independence sooner.

The study will include adults aged 65 years or older undergoing planned first-time hip replacement for osteoarthritis. Participants will be assigned by chance to one of two groups. Both groups will receive an injection of a local anaesthetic, ropivacaine, into tissues around the back of the hip joint during surgery. One group will also receive an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, which involves injecting ropivacaine near nerves that carry pain signals from the hip. Both groups will receive the same usual pain treatment and rehabilitation programme.

The main assessment will take place 24 hours after surgery. A physiotherapist who does not know the participant's treatment group will assess how much help they need to get into and out of bed, stand up, walk, and use stairs.

The study will also assess pain, use of opioid pain medicines, muscle strength, quality of recovery, and side effects. The findings will help determine whether adding a PENG block provides a meaningful benefit for recovery after hip replacement.

Read the detailed description

This study addresses whether the analgesic effects of adding a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block to posterior capsular local infiltration translate into better early functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty. Reduced pain or opioid consumption alone may not reflect a patient's ability to move independently, particularly when muscle weakness, dizziness, or sedation may also limit rehabilitation.

The primary assessment will therefore focus on the assistance required to perform everyday mobility tasks at a fixed postoperative time. This approach is intended to reduce the influence of staffing schedules and differences in the timing of the first mobilization attempt. Physiotherapists will receive standardized training in administering and scoring the functional assessment. Equivalent rehabilitation opportunities will be provided to both groups, including at weekends.

For each incomplete assessment, the reason will be documented to distinguish clinical inability to perform a task from an assessment missed for organizational reasons. Walking aids, assistance provided, and factors limiting performance will also be recorded.

The trial evaluates the additional value of a standard PENG block within an otherwise standardized care pathway. As the combined strategy includes a higher total dose of ropivacaine, any observed benefit will be interpreted as an effect of the overall strategy rather than proof of an effect attributable solely to the injection location.

Functional outcomes will be interpreted alongside analgesic requirements, muscle strength, patient-reported recovery, and adverse events to assess whether the additional procedure provides a meaningful overall benefit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Ostearthritis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Poznan University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 151 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 65 years or older.
  • Scheduled for elective primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis through a posterior surgical approach.
  • Planned spinal anaesthesia and eligibility to receive either study analgesic strategy.
  • Ability to perform basic transfers and walk independently before surgery, with a walking aid permitted.
  • Ability to understand study instructions, report pain using the Numerical Rating Scale, and complete the study questionnaires.
  • Written provided before enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hip arthroplasty for an acute fracture, revision arthroplasty, or planned bilateral hip arthroplasty.
  • Pre-existing requirement for physical assistance from another person during basic transfers or walking.
  • Planned postoperative restrictions that prevent weight-bearing or participation in the study's functional assessments.
  • Neurological, neuromuscular, or other musculoskeletal disease that substantially limits mobility independently of the hip condition being treated.
  • Cognitive impairment or a communication disorder that prevents or reliable completion of study assessments.
  • Known to ropivacaine or another medication required for the study interventions.
  • to spinal anaesthesia, PENG block, or posterior capsular infiltration, including local infection or a bleeding risk that cannot be managed in accordance with applicable regional anaesthesia guidelines.
  • A medical condition that makes the planned study interventions or early mobilization unsafe.
  • Planned use of an additional regional analgesic technique outside the study protocol.
  • Participation in another interventional study that could interfere with the assessment of pain or functional recovery.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
260 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Posterior Capsular Local Infiltration Analgesia Alone

    Participants will receive intraoperative local infiltration of the posterior hip capsule with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine (40 mg), administered by the surgeon. Participants will also receive standardized spinal anaesthesia, postoperative multimodal analgesia, rescue analgesia, and rehabilitation according to the study protocol.

    Drug: Posterior Capsular Local Infiltration Analgesia

  • Experimental
    PENG Block Plus Posterior Capsular Local Infiltration Analgesia

    Participants will receive an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine (40 mg), together with intraoperative local infiltration of the posterior hip capsule with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine (40 mg), administered by the surgeon. The total ropivacaine dose will be 80 mg. Participants will receive the same standardized spinal anaesthesia, postoperative multimodal analgesia, rescue analgesia, and rehabilitation as the comparator group.

    Drug: Posterior Capsular Local Infiltration Analgesia · Drug: Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block

Interventions

  • DrugPosterior Capsular Local Infiltration Analgesia

    Intraoperative infiltration of the posterior hip capsule with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine (40 mg), administered by the surgeon during primary total hip arthroplasty. The infiltration technique and timing will be standardized according to the study protocol.

  • DrugUltrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block

    Ultrasound-guided single-injection pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block using 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine (40 mg). The block will be performed by an anaesthesiologist using a standardized technique according to the study protocol, in addition to posterior capsular local infiltration analgesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale Score at 24 Hours

    Functional recovery will be assessed using the five-item modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (mILAS). The scale evaluates the assistance required for supine-to-sitting transfer, sitting-to-supine transfer, sit-to-stand transfer, walking, and stair climbing. Each item is scored from 0 to 6, yielding a total score from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate less assistance required and greater functional independence. A trained physiotherapist blinded to treatment allocation will administer the assessment according to a standardized scoring manual. The primary outcome is the total mILAS score at 24 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale Score at 48 Hours

    Functional recovery will be assessed using the five-item modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (mILAS). The scale evaluates the assistance required for supine-to-sitting transfer, sitting-to-supine transfer, sit-to-stand transfer, walking, and stair climbing. Each item is scored from 0 to 6, yielding a total score from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate less assistance required and greater functional independence. A trained physiotherapist blinded to treatment allocation will administer the assessment according to a standardized scoring manual. The primary outcome is the total mILAS score at 48 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: 48 hours after the end of surgery

  2. Quality of Recovery at 24 Hours

    Patient-reported recovery assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery

  3. Quality of Recovery at 48 Hours

    Patient-reported recovery assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery.

    Time frame: 48 hours after the end of surgery

  4. Pain Intensity at Rest

    Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 6 hours after the end of surgery

  5. Pain Intensity at Rest

    Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 12 hours after the end of surgery

  6. Pain Intensity at Rest

    Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery

  7. Pain Intensity at Rest

    Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 48 hours after the end of surgery

  8. Pain Intensity During Movement

    Pain intensity during a standardized sit-to-stand task will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Participants will be asked to rate the highest pain experienced while rising from a chair. Chair height, permitted use of armrests or walking aids, and assistance provided will be standardized according to the study protocol. Inability to attempt the task and the reason will be documented rather than assigned a pain score. Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 6 hours after the end of surgery

  9. Pain Intensity During Movement

    Pain intensity during a standardized sit-to-stand task will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Participants will be asked to rate the highest pain experienced while rising from a chair. Chair height, permitted use of armrests or walking aids, and assistance provided will be standardized according to the study protocol. Inability to attempt the task and the reason will be documented rather than assigned a pain score. Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 12 hours after the end of surgery

  10. Pain Intensity During Movement

    Pain intensity during a standardized sit-to-stand task will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Participants will be asked to rate the highest pain experienced while rising from a chair. Chair height, permitted use of armrests or walking aids, and assistance provided will be standardized according to the study protocol. Inability to attempt the task and the reason will be documented rather than assigned a pain score. Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery

  11. Pain Intensity During Movement

    Pain intensity during a standardized sit-to-stand task will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Participants will be asked to rate the highest pain experienced while rising from a chair. Chair height, permitted use of armrests or walking aids, and assistance provided will be standardized according to the study protocol. Inability to attempt the task and the reason will be documented rather than assigned a pain score. Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 48 hours after the end of surgery

  12. Cumulative Opioid Consumption During the First 24 Hours

    Cumulative dose of all opioid analgesics administered during the first 24 postoperative hours, converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents using conversion factors prespecified in the study protocol. Participants receiving no opioids will be assigned a value of zero.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery through 24 hours after surgery

  13. Cumulative Opioid Consumption During the First 48 Hours

    Cumulative dose of all opioid analgesics administered during the first 48 postoperative hours, converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents using conversion factors prespecified in the study protocol. Participants receiving no opioids will be assigned a value of zero.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery through 48 hours after surgery.

  14. Quadriceps Muscle Strength

    Quadriceps muscle strength of the operated limb will be assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, ranging from 0 (no visible or palpable muscle contraction) to 5 (normal muscle strength). A trained physiotherapist blinded to treatment allocation will assess knee extension using standardized patient positioning and testing procedures. Higher scores indicate greater muscle strength. Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery

  15. Quadriceps Muscle Strength

    Quadriceps muscle strength of the operated limb will be assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, ranging from 0 (no visible or palpable muscle contraction) to 5 (normal muscle strength). A trained physiotherapist blinded to treatment allocation will assess knee extension using standardized patient positioning and testing procedures. Higher scores indicate greater muscle strength. Scores at each assessment time will be analyzed separately.

    Time frame: 48 hours after the end of surgery

  16. Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

    Proportion of participants experiencing at least one episode of nausea or vomiting during the first 48 postoperative hours, regardless of whether antiemetic treatment is administered.

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

  17. Symptomatic Orthostatic Intolerance During Mobilization

    Proportion of participants experiencing dizziness, lightheadedness, blurred vision, presyncope, or syncope during postoperative sitting, standing, or walking that requires the mobilization attempt to be interrupted or terminated.

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery.

  18. Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay

    Elapsed time in hours from the end of surgery to actual hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery to hospital discharge.

  19. Incidence of Procedure-Related Adverse Events

    Proportion of participants experiencing at least one adverse event considered potentially related to the PENG block or posterior capsular infiltration, including local anaesthetic systemic toxicity, injection-site infection or hematoma, or new motor or sensory neurological deficit. Event type, onset, severity, duration, and assessed relationship to the intervention will be recorded.

    Time frame: From administration of the study intervention through postoperative day 30.

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the published study results will be available upon reasonable request. Shared data will include participant characteristics, allocated interventions, primary and secondary outcome data, and adverse events necessary to reproduce the reported analyses, together with a data dictionary. Direct identifiers will be removed, and potentially identifying variables will be modified or withheld to reduce the risk of re-identification. Data sharing will comply with participant consent, institutional requirements, and applicable data protection requirements.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Data and supporting documents will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for 5 years.

Access criteria: Researchers submitting a methodologically sound proposal may request access from the principal investigator using the contact details listed in this record. Requests must describe the research question, requested data, and planned analyses. Access will require approval by the responsible institution and, where applicable, the ethics committee, and a signed data use agreement prohibiting re-identification and unauthorized onward sharing. Approved researchers will receive the minimum dataset necessary for the agreed analyses through a secure transfer method.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 11 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 3, 2026
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07924709
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion