ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06787027wisdom toothUpdated Jan 22, 2025

Effect of Manual Massage Technique on Swelling, Pain and Mouth Opening After Bilateral Lower Third Molar Surgery

An interventional study of Manual Lymphatic Drainage technique and Conventional Treatment group in Impacted Third Molar Tooth, Swelling/ Edema and Pain, sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-22.

Sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2018, registered Jan 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of manual lymphatic drainage on pain, edema and trismus after impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled split-mouth trial. A total of 46 healthy patients who presented to our department for the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars were included in this study.The inclusion criteria were as follows: presence of pericoronal infection, no recent use of anti-inflammatory medications, symmetrical impactions on both sides, asymptomatic cases, and class 2, position B or C, vertical and mesioangular impactions. Impactions were classified using the Pell and Gregory classification system.

Exclusion criteria included patients who declined participation, pregnant or lactating individuals, patients with penicillin allergies, those with chronic diseases that could affect healing, uncooperative patients. Following the surgery, manual lymphatic drainage therapy was administered in the afternoon of the same day by a professional physiotherapist using the "Vodder" technique. In this study, measurements were conducted by two researchers. Swelling and trismus values were recorded preoperatively (T0), on the 3rd postoperative day (T1), and on the 7th postoperative day (T2). To assess pain, the VAS was used and values were recorded 1, 2, 3 and 7 days postoperatively. In this study, edema was evaluated using the 3dMD FACE SYSTEM (3dMD, Atlanta, GA), which virtually transfers the patient's face into 3D, allowing for the calculation of volume changes.To assess pain, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used.To determine the effect of MLD therapy on postoperative trismus, the distance between the upper and lower incisors was measured using a digital caliper immediately before the operation, as well as on the 3rd and 7th postoperative days

02

Conditions studied

  • Impacted Third Molar Tooth
  • Swelling/ Edema
  • Pain
  • Trismus

Keywords

  • impacted lower third molar
  • 3dMD
  • Manual Lymphatic Drainage
  • edema
03

In context

Edema

566 studies on the registry are indexed under Edema; 95 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 52 across 401 interventional studies indexed under Edema.

Browse Edema studies →

Lead sponsor

Izmir Katip Celebi University is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • good general health conditions;
  • presence of bilateral and symmetrical impacted third molars (according to the classifications of Winter and Pell and Gregory);

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no clinical evidence of major facial asymmetry;
  • use of medication that would influence or alter wound healing;
  • temporomandibular joint disorder history;
  • smoking
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Manual Lymphatic Drainage technique

    Following the morning surgery, MLD therapy was administered in the afternoon of the same day by a professional physiotherapist

    Procedure: Manual Lymphatic Drainage technique · Procedure: Conventional Treatment group

  • Experimental
    Conventional treatment

    Postoperatively, patients were prescribed antibiotics (amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, 1 g, twice daily), analgesics (paracetamol, 500 mg, twice daily), and mouthwash (chlorhexidine gluconate, three times daily) for five days.

    Procedure: Manual Lymphatic Drainage technique · Procedure: Conventional Treatment group

Interventions

  • ProcedureManual Lymphatic Drainage technique

    Following the morning surgery, manual lymphatic drainage therapy was administered in the afternoon of the same day by a professional physiotherapist.

  • ProcedureConventional Treatment group

    patients were prescribed antibiotics (amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, 1 g, twice daily), analgesics (paracetamol, 500 mg, twice daily), and mouthwash (chlorhexidine gluconate, three times daily) for five days. Cold application was recommended to all patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative facial swelling

    Facial swelling T0-T1 and T0-T2 scans are opened and superimposed through three reference points: endocanthion left (inner most point on commissure of left eye fissure), endocanthion right (inner most point on commissure of right eye fissure) and subnasale (mid point of columella). After matching, the swelling was calculated by selecting the area of the swelling and subtracting the two images.

    Time frame: one week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain

    VAS measure

    Time frame: one week

  2. Mouth opening

    measurement of the maximal distance between the cutting edge of the right maxillary and right mandibular central incisors with a caliper.

    Time frame: one week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Izmir Katip Çelebi University
    İzmir, Çiğli 35575, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06787027
Responsible party
Onur ŞAHİN (Associate Professor, Izmir Katip Celebi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 22, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2018
Completion
Sep 1, 2018
Last update
Jan 22, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion