ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06784518SPECTREUpdated Apr 2, 2026

Stroke Cerebral Reorganization Pathways (SPECTRE)

An interventional study of Clinical scores and functional MRI in Brain Diseases, Ischemic Stroke and Stroke, sponsored by Rennes University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-02.

Primary conditionStrokeRegistry: Brain DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Brain Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Stroke
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Stroke, a narrower term within Brain Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Rennes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

SPECTRE is a prospective longitudinal study in order to identify whether patients with different degrees of motor recovery are distinguished by distinct brain post-stroke plasticity patterns in the acute and sub-acute phases. This study allows close longitudinal follow-up of patients with severe clinical motor impairment using functional MRI to study cerebral neuroplasticity after ischemic stroke in the acute and sub-acute phase in patients with upper limb motor impairement, taking into account prognostic criteria used in current practice.

Read the detailed description

Patients are recruited as they are admitted to the neurovascular department. The SAFE score from the Stinear study is taken on Day 3 of the stroke, followed by motor evoked potentials between Day 3-Day 7 of the stroke, for a equal distribution of patients into three prognostic groups according to the PREP2 algorithm (good, limited and poor).

Longitudinal follow-up with clinical scores and functional MRI at Day 7-Day 10, Day 30, Month 3 and Month 6 of stroke.

Patients will ultimately be classified and analyzed according to their effective motor recovery at 6 months, using the Fugl-Meyer score.

The investigators will then conduct a comprehensive analysis of brain connectivity, examining both the anatomical structure of the brain, its functional activity and the dynamic interactions between certain regions of interest over time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Diseases
  • Ischemic Stroke
  • Stroke
  • Brain Infarction
  • Stroke Rehabilitation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke
  • Rehabilitation
  • Upper Limb
  • Neuroplasticity
  • Connectivity
03

In context

Stroke Reclassified

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Rennes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 451 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Compared within Stroke, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Brain Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (age greater than or equal to 18 years) less than 75 years of age, both sexes;
  • single supratentorial ischemic stroke confirmed by brain imaging
  • Upper limb deficit defined by a SAFE score \<5 (SAFE Stinear protocol, prognosis of post-stroke upper limb recovery) on D3 of stroke. This corresponds to the sum of shoulder abduction and finger extension according to the MRC (Medical Research Council) scale for each of these movements out of 5.
  • Absence of comprehension disorders limiting participation;
  • Patient covered by french social security;
  • Free, informed and written consent signed by the patient or a member of the patient's family (in the case of a patient who is able to understand the information and give consent but has motor difficulties resulting in an invalid signature).

Non-Inclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple ischemic strokes or history of stroke ;
  • Posterior fossa stroke ;
  • Hemorrhagic stroke;
  • Patient who have undergone thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy;
  • Extensive Fazekas grade 3 vascular leukopathy;
  • Pre-existing neurodegenerative pathology;
  • Patient with severe dyspnea or swallowing disorders who cannot undergo brain MRI;
  • Adults under legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship, family habilitation), persons deprived of liberty;
  • Women declaring that they are pregnant or breast-feeding;
  • Patient participating in another therapeutic or drug intervention study that may have an impact on the effect of cerebral neuroplasticity on the SPECTRE study;
  • Patients with to MRI pacemaker or implantable defibrillator, neurosurgical clips, cochlear implants, intra-orbital or encephalic metallic foreign bodies, stents placed less than 4 weeks ago and osteosynthesis devices placed less than 6 weeks ago, claustrophobia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If the prognostic group according to the PREP2 algorithm (good, limited and poor) has already been reached during motor evoked potential assessment the patient is excluded.
  • Recurrence of stroke (with worsening NIHSS score > 4) during study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients

    Three prognostic groups according to the PREP2 algorithm (good, limited and poor). 21 evaluable patients divided into 3 balanced prognostic groups.

    Other: Clinical scores and functional MRI

Interventions

  • OtherClinical scores and functional MRI

    Motor evoked potentials between Day 3-Day 7 of the stroke, for a equal distribution of patients into three prognostic groups according to the PREP2 algorithm (good, limited and poor). Longitudinal follow-up with clinical scores and functional MRI at Day 7-Day 10, Day 30, Month 3 and Month 6 of stroke.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in effective connectivity of Brain data (fMRI activity and CST tractography)

    Descriptive analysis of topological measures of effective connectivity graphs as a function of effective motor recovery (Fugl-Meyer score - Upper Extremity) at 6 months. The Fugl-Meyer upper limb motor subscale has a maximum score of 66. The effective Fugl Meyer score classifies motor recovery into 3 categories (mild, moderate and severe). A Fugl Meyer score of 0-28 is classified as severe, 29-42 as moderate and 42-66 as mild.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Effective connectivity of brain data

    Longitudinal analysis of topological measures of effective connectivity graphs (between Region of interest (ROIs)) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score.

    Time frame: From Day 7-Day 10 to 6 months

  2. Changes in Structural connectivity of brain data

    Analysis of topological measures of structural connectivity graphs according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score.

    Time frame: From Day7-Day 10 to 6 months

  3. Changes in Modification of brain activity of brain data

    Longitudinal analysis of brain activity (expressed as variation in BOLD hemodynamic response) at rest and during a motor task (between ROIs) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score.

    Time frame: From Day 7-Day 10 to 6 months

  4. Changes in Ipsilesional / contralesional laterality index of brain data

    Longitudinal analysis of the ipsilesional/counterlesional laterality index of activations in sensorimotor areas according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score.

    Time frame: From Day 7-Day 10 to 6 months

  5. Changes in perfusion of brain data

    Longitudinal analysis of perfusion (infratentorial, interhemispheric, intrahemispheric) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score.

    Time frame: From Day 7-Day 10 to 6 months

  6. Changes in Degree of corticospinal FA ratio of brain data

    Longitudinal analysis of the degree of FA ratio of the cortico-spinal tract (injured hemisphere / healthy hemisphere) according to the recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score.

    Time frame: From Day 7-Day 10 to 6 months

  7. Changes in patients' clinical profile in terms of motricity

    Changes in Motor scores Motor index for upper and lower limbs according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. The Motricity Index can be used to assess the motor impairment in a patient who has had a stroke. This test includes a motor test on the upper limb with a score from 0 to 100, combined with a motor test on the lower limb with a score from 0 to 100. The sum of these two scores is divided by 2 for a total out of 100. A high score indicates good recovery."

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. Changes in patients' clinical profile in terms of motricity

    Changes in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. The total score on the ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, with the lowest score indicating that no movements can be performed, and the upper score indicating normal performance. Thus, higher scores will indicate better performance. The ARAT scores is a continuous measure, with no categorical cutoff scores.

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Changes in patients' clinical profile in quality of life

    Progression in The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) score according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. The SIS contains 59 items measuring eight domains: strength (4 items), hand functionality (5 items), ADL / IADL (10 items), mobility (9 items), communication (7 items), emotions (9 items), memory / thinking (7 items), and social participation (8 items). A final item assessing overall stroke recovery is asked of the patient (score out of 100). The minimum score is 60, the maximum is 300. A high score indicates a good quality of life.

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Changes in patients' clinical profile in independence

    Progression in The Composite Functional Independence Scale (MIF) score according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. The MIF consists of 18 items measuring patients' performance in performance in activities of daily living, including cognitive and relational aspects. For each item (from 1 to 18), the therapist chooses the patient's level of incapacity from 1 (total assistance) to 7 (total independence). The total score is calculated by adding up the disability level figures for each item. The minimum score is 18, the maximum is 126. A high score indicates complete independence.

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Changes in patients' clinical profile in spasticity

    Progression in Changes in Tardieu Scale according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. The Tardieu Scale are clinical measures of muscle spasticity in patients with neurological conditions. The Tardieu Scale quantify spasticity by assessing the muscle's response to stretch applied at given velocities. The examiner evaluates the muscle group's reaction to stretch at a specified velocity with 2 parameters: X (quality of muscle reaction) and Y (angle of muscle reaction).

    Time frame: 6 months

  12. Changes in clinical profile in terms of motor skills

    Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assesment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. The FMA assesses motor impairment of the upper and lower limb, balance, sensitivity, passive joint mobility and pain on mobilization following stroke. The Fugl-Meyer upper limb motor subscale has a maximum score of 66. The effective Fugl Meyer score classifies motor recovery into 3 categories (mild, moderate and severe). A Fugl Meyer score of 0-28 is classified as severe, 29-42 as moderate and 42-66 as mild.

    Time frame: Day 7-Day 10

  13. Changes in clinical profile in terms of motor skills

    Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assesment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. The FMA assesses motor impairment of the upper and lower limb, balance, sensitivity, passive joint mobility and pain on mobilization following stroke. The Fugl-Meyer upper limb motor subscale has a maximum score of 66. The effective Fugl Meyer score classifies motor recovery into 3 categories (mild, moderate and severe). A Fugl Meyer score of 0-28 is classified as severe, 29-42 as moderate and 42-66 as mild.

    Time frame: Day 30

  14. Changes in clinical profile in terms of motor skills

    Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assesment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. The FMA assesses motor impairment of the upper and lower limb, balance, sensitivity, passive joint mobility and pain on mobilization following stroke. The Fugl-Meyer upper limb motor subscale has a maximum score of 66. The effective Fugl Meyer score classifies motor recovery into 3 categories (mild, moderate and severe). A Fugl Meyer score of 0-28 is classified as severe, 29-42 as moderate and 42-66 as mild.

    Time frame: 3 months

  15. Changes in clinical profile in terms of motor skills

    Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assesment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. The FMA assesses motor impairment of the upper and lower limb, balance, sensitivity, passive joint mobility and pain on mobilization following stroke. The Fugl-Meyer upper limb motor subscale has a maximum score of 66. The effective Fugl Meyer score classifies motor recovery into 3 categories (mild, moderate and severe). A Fugl Meyer score of 0-28 is classified as severe, 29-42 as moderate and 42-66 as mild.

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Changes in clinical profile in terms of of global impairment

    Changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. This scale assesses level of consciousness, extraocular movements, field of vision, facial muscle function, extremity strength, sensory function, coordination (ataxia), language (aphasia), speech (dysarthria) and hemineglect (neglect). Total NIHSS scores range from 0 to 42, with higher values reflecting more severe brain damage. Stroke severity is defined according to threshold scores as follows: \> 25 - severe neurological deficits, 5-14 - moderate neurological deficits, \< 5 - mild deficits.

    Time frame: Day 7-Day 10

  17. Changes in clinical profile in terms of of global impairment

    Changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. This scale assesses level of consciousness, extraocular movements, field of vision, facial muscle function, extremity strength, sensory function, coordination (ataxia), language (aphasia), speech (dysarthria) and hemineglect (neglect). Total NIHSS scores range from 0 to 42, with higher values reflecting more severe brain damage. Stroke severity is defined according to threshold scores as follows: \> 25 - severe neurological deficits, 5-14 - moderate neurological deficits, \< 5 - mild deficits.

    Time frame: Day 30

  18. Changes in clinical profile in terms of of global impairment

    Changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. This scale assesses level of consciousness, extraocular movements, field of vision, facial muscle function, extremity strength, sensory function, coordination (ataxia), language (aphasia), speech (dysarthria) and hemineglect (neglect). Total NIHSS scores range from 0 to 42, with higher values reflecting more severe brain damage. Stroke severity is defined according to threshold scores as follows: \> 25 - severe neurological deficits, 5-14 - moderate neurological deficits, \< 5 - mild deficits.

    Time frame: 3 months

  19. Changes in clinical profile in terms of of global impairment

    Changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) according to recovery categories defined by the Fugl-Meyer score. This scale assesses level of consciousness, extraocular movements, field of vision, facial muscle function, extremity strength, sensory function, coordination (ataxia), language (aphasia), speech (dysarthria) and hemineglect (neglect). Total NIHSS scores range from 0 to 42, with higher values reflecting more severe brain damage. Stroke severity is defined according to threshold scores as follows: \> 25 - severe neurological deficits, 5-14 - moderate neurological deficits, \< 5 - mild deficits.

    Time frame: 6 months

  20. Changes in neurological events

    Changes in significant clinical worsening defined by a worsening of the NIHSS score by 4 points, epileptic seizure. This scale assesses level of consciousness, extraocular movements, field of vision, facial muscle function, extremity strength, sensory function, coordination (ataxia), language (aphasia), speech (dysarthria) and hemineglect (neglect). Total NIHSS scores range from 0 to 42, with higher values reflecting more severe brain damage. Stroke severity is defined according to threshold scores as follows: \> 25 - severe neurological deficits, 5-14 - moderate neurological deficits, \< 5 - mild deficits.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of evaluation at 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rennes Chu
    Rennes, France 35033, France
    • Maud GUILLEN, Md · Contactmaud.guillen@chu-rennes.fr · 299284122
    • Maud GUILLEN, Md · Principal investigator
    • Clément TRACOL, Md · Sub investigator
    • Simon BUTET, Md · Sub investigator
    • Stéphanie LEPLAIDEUR, Md · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06784518
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 20, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 2, 2026

Study contacts

Maud GUILLEN, Md
Contact
maud.guillen@chu-rennes.fr
299284122 ext. +33
Isabelle LEROYER
Contact
isabelle.leroyer@chu-rennes.fr
299284321 ext. +33
Maud GUILLEN, Md
principal investigator · RENNES CHU

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion