A Phase 3 interventional study of Conventional and simplfied in MBL and Bone Loss, sponsored by Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-17.
Sponsored by Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Despite the growing interest in these alternative drilling protocols, there is a lack of robust clinical evidence evaluating their long-term effects on MBL. The aim of the present study was therefore, to evaluate the effect of implant site preparation technique (conventional drilling versus simplfied) on change in the marginal bone level and insertion torque.
Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia is the lead sponsor of 132 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Conventional Drilling Protocol
Other: Conventional
simplfied drilling protocol
Other: simplfied
conventional drilling protocol using full sequence
3 burrs for implant placment
Marginal bone loss (MBL)
Is a non-infective remodeling process of variable entity occurring after implant placement.
Time frame: 24 month
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia